References
- 12). Discipline-Based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and Engineering. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362
- Airey, J. (2006). Physics students’ experiences of the disciplinary discourse encountered in lectures in English and Swedish. Department of Physics, Uppsala University.
- Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20265
- Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2017). Social semiotics in university physics education. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. E. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 95–122). Springer.
- Barba, R. H., & Rubba, P. A. (1993). Expert and novice, earth and space science: Teachers’ declarative, procedural and structural knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150305
- Bowen, C. W., & Bodner, G. M. (1991). Problem-solving processes used by students in organic synthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130202
- Bretz, S. L. (2019). Evidence for the importance of laboratory courses. ACS Publications.
- Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Parchmann, I. (2018). Using model-based scaffolds to support students solving context-based chemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1176–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470350
- Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
- Chowrira, S. G., Smith, K. M., Dubois, P. J., & Roll, I. (2019). DIY productive failure: Boosting performance in a large undergraduate biology course. Science of Learning, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0040-6
- Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2011). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. John Wiley & Sons.
- Corbin, J., Strauss, A., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Crozier, S. E., & Cassell, C. M. (2016). Methodological considerations in the use of audio diaries in work psychology: Adding to the qualitative toolkit. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 396–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12132
- Eriksson, U., Linder, C., Airey, J., & Redfors, A. (2014). Introducing the anatomy of disciplinary discernment: An example from astronomy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3). arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00269.
- Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
- Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures (Vol. 5019). Basic books.
- Gouvea, J. S., Sawtelle, V., Geller, B. D., & Turpen, C. (2013). A framework for analyzing interdisciplinary tasks: Implications for student learning and curricular design. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-08-0135
- Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer.
- Heep, B. K., Weldert, K. S., Krysiak, Y., Day, T. W., Zeier, W. G., Kolb, U., Snyder, G. J., & Tremel, W. (2017). High electron mobility and disorder induced by silver ion migration lead to good thermoelectric performance in the argyrodite Ag8SiSe6. Chemistry of Materials, 29(11), 4833–4839. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00767
- Herrington, T., & Herrington, J. (2005). Authentic learning environments in higher education. IGI Global.
- Heyworth, R. M. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290787
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052002201
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
- Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2016). A solid future for battery development. Energy, 500(400), 300.
- Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40(4), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9209-6
- Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12107
- Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195
- Kirschner, P., & Meester, M. (1988). The laboratory in higher science education: Problems, premises and objectives. Higher Education, 17(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130901
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
- Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
- Koumoto, K., Funahashi, R., Guilmeau, E., Miyazaki, Y., Weidenkaff, A., Wang, Y., & Wan, C. (2013). Thermoelectric ceramics for energy harvesting. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 96(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12076
- Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199711)34:9<949::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-U
- Krauskopf, T., Muy, S., Culver, S. P., Ohno, S., Delaire, O., Shao-Horn, Y., & Zeier, W. G. (2018). Comparing the descriptors for investigating the influence of lattice dynamics on ionic transport using the superionic conductor Na3PS4-xSex. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 140(43), 14464-14473. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b09340
- Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Kuo, E., Hallinen, N. R., & Conlin, L. D. (2017). When procedures discourage insight: Epistemological consequences of prompting novice physics students to construct force diagrams. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 814–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1308037
- Lamnina, M., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity, affect, learning, and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101785
- Larkin, J. H., & Reif, F. (1979). Understanding and teaching problem-solving in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528790010208
- Lemke, J. L. (1998). Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. (Ed.),^(Eds.). Conference on science education in Barcelona.
- Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). Knowing what you don't know makes failure productive. Learning and Instruction, 34, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.004
- Manz, E. (2018). Designing for and Analyzing Productive Uncertainty in Science Investigations (International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
- Momma, K., & Izumi, F. (2008). VESTA: A three-dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analysis. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 41(3), 653-658. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889808012016
- Nguyen, D.-H., & Rebello, N. S. (2011). Students’ difficulties with multiple representations in introductory Mechanics. Online Submission, 8(5), 559–569.
- Nyachwaya, J. M., Warfa, A.-R. M., Roehrig, G. H., & Schneider, J. L. (2014). College chemistry students’ use of memorized algorithms in chemical reactions. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 15(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00114H
- Overton, T. L. (2019). Foreword from Prof Tina Overton. In M. K. Seery, & C. Mc Donnell (Eds.), Teaching chemistry in higher education: A Festschrift in Honour of Professor Tina Overton (pp. 1–4). Creathach Press.
- Overton, T., & Potter, N. (2008). Solving open-ended problems, and the influence of cognitive factors on student success. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1039/B801307C
- Overton, T., Potter, N., & Leng, C. (2013). A study of approaches to solving open-ended problems in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00028A
- Overton, T. L., & Randles, C. A. (2015). Beyond problem-based learning: Using dynamic PBL in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00248B
- Pollock, E. B., Thompson, J. R., & Mountcastle, D. B. (2007). Student Understanding Of The Physics And Mathematics Of Process Variables In P-V Diagrams. (Ed.),^(Eds.). AIP Conference Proceedings.
- Ponterotto, J. G. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 538–549. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol11/iss3/6
- Randles, C. A., & Overton, T. L. (2015). Expert vs. Novice: Approaches used by chemists when solving open-ended problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00114E
- Randles, C., Overton, T., Galloway, R., & Wallace, M. (2018). How do approaches to solving open-ended problems vary within the science disciplines? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1367–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1503432
- Redshaw, C. H., & Frampton, I. (2014). Optimising Inter-disciplinary problem-based learning in Postgraduate environmental and science education: Recommendations from a case study. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.205a
- Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90026C
- Roesch, F., Nerb, J., & Riess, W. (2015). Promoting experimental problem-solving ability in sixth-grade students through problem-oriented teaching of ecology: Findings of an intervention study in a complex domain. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1000427
- Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications Inc.
- Salinas-Hernández, U., Sacristán, A. I., & Trouche, L. (2018). Technology integration into mathematics classrooms: case study of a highschool teacher’s use of GeoGebra. (Ed.),^(Eds.). Proceedings of the Re (s) sources International Conference.
- Sarkar, M., Overton, T., Thompson, C., & Rayner, G. (2016). Graduate employability: Views of recent science graduates and employers. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (Formerly CAL-Laborate International, 24(3).
- Seery, M. K., Agustian, H. Y., Doidge, E. D., Kucharski, M. M., O’Connor, H. M., & Price, A. (2017). Developing laboratory skills by incorporating peer-review and digital badges. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00003K
- Selvaratnam, M. (2011). Chemistry students’ competence throughout their BSc course in some problem-solving strategies. South African Journal of Chemistry, 64(1), 44–48.
- Selvaratnam, M., & Canagaratna, S. G. (2008). Using problem-solution maps to improve students’ problem-solving skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(3), 381. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p381
- Sternberg, R. J. (2003). What is an “expert student?”. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008005
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
- Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
- Yu, K.-C., Fan, S.-C., & Lin, K.-Y. (2015). Enhancing students’ problem-solving Sikills through context-based learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1377–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4
- Yuriev, E., Basal, S., & Vo, K. (2019). Developing problem-solving skills in physical chemistry. In M. K. M. D. C. Seery (Ed.), Teaching chemistry in higher education: A Festschrift in Honour of Professor Tina Overton (pp. 55–76). Creathach Press.
- Yuriev, E., Naidu, S., Schembri, L. S., & Short, J. L. (2017). Scaffolding the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry: Guiding novice students out of dead ends and false starts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00009J
- Zeier, W. G., Zevalkink, A., Gibbs, Z. M., Hautier, G., Kanatzidis, M. G., & Snyder, G. J. (2016). Thinking like a chemist: Intuition in thermoelectric materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 55(24), 6826–6841. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201508381
- Zhang, D., & Shen, J. (2015). Disciplinary foundations for solving interdisciplinary scientific problems. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2555–2576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1085658