Factors explaining students’ attitudes towards learning genetics and belief in genetic determinism

References

• Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2015). Genetic determinism in the Finnish upper secondary school biology textbooks. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2042
   Google Scholar
• Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2019). Teachers’ choice of content and consideration of controversial and sensitive issues in teaching of secondary school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1694195
   Google Scholar
• Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreychik, M. R., & Gill, M. J. (2015). Do natural kind beliefs about social groups contribute to prejudice? Distinguishing bio-somatic essentialism from bio-behavioral essentialism, and both of these from entitativity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214550341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banet, E., & Ayuso, E. (2000). Teaching genetics at secondary schoo : A strategy for teaching about the location of inheritance information. Science & Education, 84(3), 313–351. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<313::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerwinkel, D. J., Yarden, A., & Waarlo, A. J. (2017). Reaching a consensus on the definition of genetic literacy that is required from a twenty-first-century citizen. Science and Education, 26(10), 1087–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9934-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotti, S. L. V., Tezza, R., de Andrade, D. F., Bornia, A. C., & de Sousa Júnior, A. F. (2013). Relevance and advantages of using the item response theory. Quality and Quantity, 47(4), 2341–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9684-5
   Google Scholar
• Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010a). High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 75(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9136-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010b). Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confirmatory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(3), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609353115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calado, F., Scharfenberg, F.-J., & Bogner, F. (2015). To what extent do biology textbooks contribute to scientific literacy? Criteria for analysing science-technology-society-environment issues. Education Sciences, 5(4), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5040255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, G., Clément, P., Bogner, F. X., & Caravita, S. (2008). BIOHEAD-Citizen: Biology, Health and Environmental Education for better citizenship (FP6, Priority 7, Project N° CITC-CT-2004-506015). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho dos Santos, V., Joaquim, L. M., El-Hani, C. N. (2012). Hybrid deterministic views about genes in biology textbooks: A key problem in genetics teaching. Science & Education, 21(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, R. B., Castéra, J., Gericke, N., Evangelista, N. A. M., El-Hani, C. N., & Li, D. (2017). Young adults’ belief in genetic determinism, and knowledge and attitudes towards modern genetics and genomics: The PUGGS questionnaire. PLoS ONE, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanoves, M., González, Á, Salvadó, Z., Haro, J., & Novo, M. (2015). Knowledge and attitudes towards biotechnology of elementary education preservice teachers: The first Spanish experience. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2923–2941. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1116718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castéra, J., Bruguière, C., & Clément, P. (2008). Genetic diseases and genetic determinism models in French secondary school biology textbooks. Journal of Biology Education, 42(2), 53–59. doi:10.1080/00219266.2008.9656111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castéra, J., & Clément, P. (2014). Teachers’ conceptions about the genetic determinism of human behaviour: A survey in 23 countries. Science & Education, 23(2), 417–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9494-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P. (2015). Extended mixed-effects item response models with the MH-RM algorithm. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52(2), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R., Likhanov, M., Selita, F., Zakharov, I., Smith-Woolley, E., & Kovas, Y. (2019). New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: Genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated. Journal of Community Genetics, 10(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0363-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, Y.-C. (2008). Learning difficulties in genetics and the development of related attitudes in Taiwanese junior high schools. University of Glasgow. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/168/
   Google Scholar
• Clément, P., Laurent, C., & Carvalho, G. (2007). Methodology for constructing and validating a questionnaire for an international comparative analysis of teachers’ conceptions of biology, Health and environment: The European project of research BIOHEAD-citizen. In Proceedings Meeting ESERA (European Science Education Research Association), Malmö, Sweden, 21.-25.8.2007.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M., Gronnvoll, M., Landau, J., Shen, L., Wright, L., & Harris, T. M. (2009). Believing in both genetic determinism and behavioral action: A materialist framework and implications. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508094098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Črne-Hladnik, H., Peklaj, C., Košmelj, K., Hladnik, A., & Javornik, B. (2009). Assessment of Slovene secondary school students’ attitudes to biotechnology in terms of usefulness, moral acceptability and risk perception. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509336761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambrun, M., Kamiejski, R., Haddadi, N., & Duarte, S. (2009). Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of “geneticism.”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, V. (2007). An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ayala, R J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, B. M. (2014). Playing with fire? The impact of the hidden curriculum in school genetics on essentialist conceptions of race. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 462–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, Brace, & Janovich.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. (2019). Special Eurobarometer report: Food safety in the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/748467
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2003). National Core curriculum for general upper secondary school. Helsinki, Finland: Opetushallitus.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, M. J., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2012). Multidimensional analysis of highschool students’ perceptions about biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, G. E., & Troelstrup, A. (2015). Students’ attitudes toward gene technology: Deconstructing a construct. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9542-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N. (2008). Science versus school-science – multiple models in genetics: The depiction of gene function in upper secondary textbooks and its influence on students’ understanding. Karlstadt University.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Carver, R., Castéra, J., Evangelista, N. A. M., Marre, C. C., & El-Hani, C. N. (2017). Exploring relationships among belief in genetic determinism, genetics knowledge, and social factors. Science and Education, 26(10), 1223–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9950-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., & Hagberg, M. (2007). Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 849–881. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9064-4
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Hagberg, M., dos Santos, V. C., Joaquim, L. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2014). Conceptual variation or incoherence? Textbook discourse on genes in six countries. Science & Education, 23(2), 381–416. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9499-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., & Smith, M. U. (2014). Twenty-first-century genetics and genomics: Contributions of HPS-informed research and pedagogy. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 423–467). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_15
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 532–560. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneman, L., Timmermans, D. R. M., & Van Der Wal, G. (2006). Public attitudes toward genetic testing: Perceived benefits and objections. Genetic Testing, 10(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1089/gte.2006.10.139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henneman, L., Vermeulen, E., Van El, C. G., Claassen, L., Timmermans, D. R. M., & Cornel, M. C. (2013). Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: Comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(8), 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, A., & Radick, G. (2017). Genetic determinism in the genetics curriculum: An exploratory study of the effects of Mendelian and Weldonian emphases. Science and Education, 26(10), 1261–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9900-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M. (2006). Teaching mathematics with textbooks a classroom and curricular perspective. Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kidman, G. (2010). What is an “interesting curriculum” for biotechnology education? Students and teachers opposing views. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9125-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klop, T., & Severiens, S. (2007). An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: A study among Dutch secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600951556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloser, M. (2013). Exploring high school biology students’ engagement with more and less epistemologically considerate texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1232–1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Revisiting students’ understanding of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 195–206. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElhinny, T. L., Dougherty, M. J., Bowling, B. V., & Libarkin, J. C. (2014). The status of genetics curriculum in higher education in the United States: Goals and assessment. Science and Education, 23(2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9566-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsämuuronen, J. (2012). Challenges of the Fennema-Sherman test in the International comparisons. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v4n3p1
   Google Scholar
• Mielby, H., Sandøe, P., & Lassen, J. (2013). The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies. Public Understanding of Science, 22(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511430577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169201600206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., & Lindee, S. (1995). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A., Öhman, S., & Rashid, S. (2006). Attitudes to gene technology: The significance of trust in institutions. European Societies, 8(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690601002707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, R. J., & Kerfeld, C. A. (2012). “Why do we have to learn this stuff?” — A new genetics for 21st century students. PLoS Biology, 10(7). Article e1001356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001356
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. R. M., Van Horne, K., Zhang, H., & Boughman, J. (2008). Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content. Genetics, 178(3), 1157–1168. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.084194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shostak, S., Freese, J., Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2009). The politics of the gene: Social status and beliefs about genetics for individual outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Gericke, N. (2013). Mendel in the modern classroom. Science & Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9629-y
   Google Scholar
• Snell, K., & Tarkkala, H. (2019). Questioning the rhetoric of a “willing population” in Finnish biobanking. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 15(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-019-0094-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., & Fife-Schaw, C. (2010). Public attitudes to genomic science: An experiment in information provision. Public Understanding of Science, 19(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508093371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornabene, Robyn E, Sbeglia, Gena C., & Nehm, Ross H. (2020). Measuring Belief in Genetic Determinism: A Psychometric Evaluation of the PUGGS Instrument. Science & Education, 29(6), 1621–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00146-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper-secondary school students’ orientation towards biology-related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9516-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar