The (lack of) relationship between secondary science teachers’ self-efficacy for culturally responsive instruction and their observed practices

References

• Achieve Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. www.nextgenscience.org
   Google Scholar
• Acquah, E. O., & Commins, N. L. (2016). Methods that matter in addressing cultural diversity with teacher candidates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1273217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arseven, A. (2016). Self-efficacy: A concept analysis. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 11(19), 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.10001
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. Academic Press, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. C., & Crippen, K. J. (2016). Designing for culturally responsive science education through professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 470–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. C., & Crippen, K. J. (2017). The knowledge and practices of high school science teachers in pursuit of cultural responsiveness. Science Education, 101(1), 99–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Ring-Whalen, E., Roehrig, G., & Ellis, J. (2018). Advancing culturally responsive science education in secondary classrooms through an induction course. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 9(1), 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, K. J. (1995). Understanding cognition, choice, and behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(95)00020-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Deehan, J., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the science teaching efficacy beliefs and science experiences of a cohort of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2548–2573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1393706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Preparing teachers for diversity: The role of initial teacher education. Final report to Directorate General for Education, Youth, Sport, and Culture of the European Commission. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/s/orks
   Google Scholar
• Fakoyede, S. J., & Otulaja, F. S. (2019). Beads and beadwork as cultural artifacts used in mediating learners’ agentic constructs in science classrooms: A case for place-based learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09911-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, B., Button, L., Kelly, C., & Button, G. (2010). Preservice teachers’ self-perceptions and attitudes toward culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 5(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.9741/2161-2978.1029
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In 7th European conference on research methodology for business and management studies (pp. 195–200). Academic Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T., & Terry Sr, C. L. (2011). Culturally responsive pedagogy for African American students: Promising programs and practices for enhanced academic performance. Teaching Education, 22(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.608424
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2013). Articulating a validity argument. In G. Fulcher & F. Davidson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 48–61). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khourey-Bowers, C., & Fenk, C. (2009). Influence of constructivist professional development on chemistry content knowledge and scientific model development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9140-0
   Google Scholar
• Khourey-Bowers, C., & Simonis, D. (2004). Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development: Enhancement of personal science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 175–195.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kotluk, N., & Kocakaya, S. (2020). Examining teachers’ culturally relevant education self-efficacy perceptions in Turkey. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2020-0023
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
   Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Smiley, W., Thompson, S., & Dickenson, T. (2016). The impact of a professional development model on middle school science teachers’ efficacy and implementation of inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2712–2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1259535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux, J. E. (2002). Self-efficacy. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 277–287). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallory, K., & Saccysyn, T. (2012). Culturally responsive instruction observation self-assessment (Unpublished instrument). University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Malo-Juvera, V., Powell, R., & Cantrell, S. (2013). Development, validation, and factor analysis of the Culturally Responsive Instruction Observation Protocol. In Paper presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. AERA Online Paper Repository.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, M., Moussa-Inaty, J., & Barza, L. (2014). Science teaching self-efficacy of culturally foreign teachers – a baseline study in Abu Dhabi. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensah, F. M. (2013). Theoretically and practically speaking, what is needed in diversity and equity in science teaching and learning? Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.743781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., Bilica, K., Wandless, A., & Gdovin, R. (2014). Exploring the relationship between teaching efficacy and cultural efficacy of novice science teachers in high-needs schools. School Science and Mathematics, 114(7), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12087
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neri, R. C., Lozano, M., & Gomez, L. M. (2019). (Re) framing resistance to culturally relevant education as a multilevel learning problem. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 197–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821120
   Google Scholar
• Norris, C. M., Morris, J. E., & Lummis, G. W. (2018). Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy to teach primary science based on ‘science learner’ typology. International Journal of Science Education, 40(18), 2292–2308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1528645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2011). Sources of efficacy information in an inservice program for elementary teachers. Science Education, 95, 577–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2018). What unites and divides urban, suburban and rural communities.
   Google Scholar
• Posnanski, T. (2002). Professional development programs for elementary science teachers: An analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional development model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R., Cantrell, S. C., Malo-Juvera, V., & Correll, P. (2016). Operationalizing culturally responsive instruction: Preliminary findings of CRIOP research. Teachers College Record, 118, 1–46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, E. H. (2014). A study of novice science teachers’ conceptualizations of culturally relevant pedagogy [Doctoral dissertation]. UCLA. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sz9c5jm
   Google Scholar
• Ritosa, A. (2017). Interventions supporting mathematics and science in-service and pre-service teachers’ cultural responsiveness: A systematic literature review from 1995–2017. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1104961/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A. J. (2015). What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sigman, M., Dublin, R., Anderson, A., Deans, N., Warburton, J., Matsumoto, G. I., Dugan, D., & Harcharek, J. (2014). Using large marine ecosystems and cultural responsiveness as the context for professional development of teachers and scientists in ocean sciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.5408/12-403.1
   Google Scholar
• Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1086–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siwatu, K. O. (2011). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy-forming experiences: A mixed methods study. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.487081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, S. (2015). ‘Because they want to teach you about their culture’: Analyzing effective mentoring conversations between culturally responsible mentors and secondary science teachers of indigenous students in mainstream schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1325–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD). (2019). State nonfiscal survey of public elementary and secondary education. 2000–01 and 2017–18; and National elementary and secondary enrollment by race/ethnicity projection model, 1972 through 2029. Digest of Education Statistics 2019, table 203.50.
   Google Scholar
• Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/9171/
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J., Thomson, C., & Williams, A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968
   Google Scholar
• Zozakiewicz, C., & Rodriguez, A. J. (2007). Using sociotransformative constructivism to create multicultural and gender-inclusive classrooms: An intervention project for teacher professional development. Educational Policy, 21(2), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904806290126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar