References
- Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672
- Archer, L., Dewitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old school children’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
- Ayene, M., Krick, J., Damitie, B., Ingerman, A., & Thacker, B. (2019). A holistic picture of physics student conceptions of energy quantization, the photon concept, and light quanta interference. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(6), 1049–1070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9906-y
- Ayene, M., Kriek, J., & Damtie, B. (2011). Wave-particle duality and uncertainty principle: Phenomenographic categories of description of tertiary physics students’ depictions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020113
- Baldy, E. (2007). A new educational perspective for teaching gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1767–1788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083367
- Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549621
- Choudhary, R., Foppoli, A., Kaur, T., Blair, D., Burman, R., & Zadnik, M. (2020). A comparison of short and long Einsteinian physics intervention programmes in middle school. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09944-8
- Choudhary, R., Kraus, U., Kersting, M., Blair, D., Zahn, C., Zadnik, M., & Meagher, R. (2019). Einsteinian physics in the classroom: Integrating physical and digital learning resources in the context of an International research collaboration. The Physics Educator, 01(04), article 1950016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661339519500161
- Dare, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2016). “If I had to do it, then I would”: understanding early middle school students’ perceptions of physics and physics-related careers by gender. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020117
- Dimitriadi, K., & Halkia, K. (2012). Secondary students’ understanding of basic ideas of special relativity. International Journal of Science Education, 34(16), 2565–2582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.705048
- Henriksen, E. K., & Angell, C. (2010). The role of ‘talking physics’ in an undergraduate physics class using an electronic audience response system. Physics Education, 45(3), 278–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/3/008
- Henriksen, E. K., Bungum, B., Angell, C., Tellefsen, C. W., Frågåt, T., & Vetleseter Bøe, M. (2014). Relativity, quantum physics and philosophy in the upper secondary curriculum: Challenges, opportunities and proposed approaches. Physics Education, 49(6), 678–684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/49/6/678
- Ireland, J. E., Watters, J. J., Brownlee, J., & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary teacher’s conceptions of inquiry teaching: Messages for teacher development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9251-2
- Jidesjö, A., Oscarsson, M., Karlsson, K.-G., & Strömdahl, H. (2012). Science for all or science for some: What Swedish students want to learn about in secondary science and technology and their opinions on science lessons. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 5(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.352
- Johansson, A. (2018). Undergraduate quantum mechanics: Lost opportunities for engaging motivated students? European Journal of Physics, 39(2), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa9b42
- Johansson, A., Andersson, S., Salminen-Karlsson, M., & Elmgren, M. (2018). “Shut up and calculate”: The available discursive positions in quantum physics courses. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9742-8
- Kamphorst, F., Vollebregt, M. J., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2019). Students’ preinstructional reasoning with the speed of light in relativistic situations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), article 020123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020123
- Kapon, S., Laherto, A., & Levrini, O. (2018). Disciplinary authenticity and personal relevance in school science. Science Education, 102(5), 1077–1106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21458
- Kaur, T., Blair, D., Choudhary, R. K., Dua, Y. S., Foppoli, A., Treagust, D., & Zadnik, M. (2020a). Gender response to Einsteinian physics interventions in school. Physics Education, 55(3), 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab764d
- Kaur, T., Blair, D., Stannard, W., Treagust, D., Venville, G., Zadnik, M., Mathews, W., & Perks, D. (2020b). Determining the intelligibility of Einsteinian concepts with middle school students. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2505–2532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9791-y
- Kersting, M., & Blair, D. (2021). Teaching Einsteinian Physics in Schools. Routledge.
- Kersting, M., Henriksen, E. K., Bøe, M. V., & Angell, C. (2018). General relativity in upper secondary school: Design and evaluation of an online learning environment using the model of educational reconstruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), article 010130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010130
- Koul, R., Lerdpornkulrat, T., & Poondej, C. (2016). Gender compatibility, math-gender stereotypes, and self-concepts in math and physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 15–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020115
- Kraus, U., Zahn, C., & Moustafa, M. (2018). General relativity in German secondary schools. Didaktik Der Physik Frühjahrstagung – Würzburg, 2018, 471–475. http://www.phydid.de/index.php/phydid-b/article/view/871
- Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education: A literature review. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010109–010121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010109
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
- Levrini, O., & Fantini, P. (2013). Encountering productive forms of complexity in learning modern physics. Science & Education, 22(8), 1895–1910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9587-4
- Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing Science: Understanding the declines in senior high school science enrolments (Issue January 2010).
- Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
- Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2013). What sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK survey. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2979–2998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.681076
- Park, W., Yang, S., & Song, J. (2019). When modern physics meets nature of science: The representation of nature of science in general relativity in new Korean physics textbooks. Science and Education, 28, 1055–1083. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00075-9
- Pitts, M., Venville, G., Blair, D., & Zadnik, M. (2014). An exploratory study to investigate the impact of an Enrichment Program on aspects of Einsteinian physics on year 6 students. Research in Science Education, 44(3), 363–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9386-6
- Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2003). Gender and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 509–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000017270
- Säljö, R. (1997). Talk as data and practice—A critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160205
- Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.590543
- Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–16. https://www.uv.uio.no/ils/english/research/projects/rose/publications/how-to-learn.pdf
- Stadermann, H. K. E., & Goedhart, M. J. (2020). Secondary school students’ views of nature of science in quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 442(6), 997–1016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1745926
- Taylor, P. C. (2014). Contemporary qualitative research. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 38–54). Routledge.
- Taylor, D. L., & Booth, S. (2015). Secondary Physical science teachers’ conceptions of science Teaching in a context of change. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1299–1320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1035356
- Treagust, D. F. (n.d.). Changing paradigms in science and in education. In M. Kersting, & D. Blair (Eds.), Teaching Einsteinian Physics in Schools (in press).
- Velentzas, A., & Halkia, K. (2013). The use of thought experiments in teaching physics to upper secondary-level students: Two examples from the theory of relativity. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3026–3049. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.682182
- Venville, G., Blair, D., Coward, D., Deshon, F., Gargano, M., Gondwe, M., Heary, A., Longnecker, N., Pitts, M., & Zadnik, M. (2012). Research-informed science enrichment programs at the Gravity Discovery Centre. Teaching Science, 58(1), 35–41. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Research+informed+science+enrichment+programs+at+the+Gravity+Discovery...-a0288876545
- Vetleseter Bøe, M., Henriksen, E. K., & Angell, C. (2018). Actual versus implied physics students: How students from traditional physics classrooms related to an innovative approach to quantum physics. Science Education, 102(4), 649–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21339
- Woithe, J., & Kersting, M. (2021). Bend it like dark matter!. Physics Education, 56(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abe09c
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications—design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.