References
- Agersnap, S., Larsen, W. B., Knudsen, S. W., Strand, D., Thomsen, P. F., Hesselsøe, M., Mortensen, P. B., Vrålstad, T., Møller, P. R., & Doi, H. (2017). Monitoring of noble, signal and narrow-clawed crayfish using environmental DNA from freshwater samples. PLoS One, 12(6), e0179261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179261
- Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077
- Aivelo, T., & Huovelin, S. (2020). Combining formal education and citizen science: A case study on students’ perceptions of learning and interest in an urban rat project. Environmental Education Research, 26(3), 324–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1727860
- Andridge, R. R., & Little, R. J. A. (2010). A review of Hot deck imputation for survey non-response. International Statistical Review = Revue internationale de statistique, 78(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
- Biggs, J., Ewald, N., Valentini, A., Gaboriaud, C., Dejean, T., Griffiths, R. A., Foster, J., Wilkinson, J. W., Arnell, A., Brotherton, P., Williams, P., & Dunn, F. (2015). Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biological Conservation, 183(3), 19–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.029
- Blankenburg, J. S., Höffler, T. N., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigating students’ interest in science. Science Education, 100(2), 364–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21204
- Bøe, M. V. (2012). Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: What matters? Science Education, 96(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20461
- Borrell, Y. J., Muñoz-Colmenero, A. M., Dopico, E., Miralles, L., & Garcia-Vazquez, E. (2016). Food control and a citizen science approach for improving teaching of genetics in universities. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(5), 450–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20971
- Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099–1121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069483
- Brown, E. R., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., Allen, J. M., & Muragishi, G. (2015). From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ biomedical science motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1116–1135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000033
- Council, N. R. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
- Courville, T., & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: β is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401612006
- Deci, E. E. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin and Company.
- Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597
- Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368
- Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). Freeman.
- Elster, D. (2009). Biology in context: Teachers’ professional development in learning communities. Journal of Biological Education, 43(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656152
- Fryer, L. K., & Ainley, M. (2019). Supporting interest in a study domain: A longitudinal test of the interplay between interest, utility-value, and competence beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 60(4), 252–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.002
- Fulmer, S. M., & Frijters, J. C. (2011). Motivation during an excessively challenging reading task: The buffering role of relative topic interest. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.481503
- Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Häfner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028
- Habig, S., Blankenburg, J., van Vorst, H., Fechner, S., Parchmann, I., & Sumfleth, E. (2018). Context characteristics and their effects on students’ situational interest in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1154–1175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470349
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562–575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562
- Harackiewicz, J. M., & Knogler, M. (2017). Interest: Theory and application. In A. J. Elliot, D. Yeager, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed., pp. 334–352). Guilford.
- Hartwell, M., & Kaplan, A. (2018). Students’ personal connection with science: Investigating the multidimensional phenomenological structure of self-relevance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1381581
- Hiller, S. E., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). The effect of a horseshoe crab citizen science program on middle school student science performance and STEM career motivation. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 302–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12081
- Holstermann, N., Ainley, M., Grube, D., Roick, T., & Bögeholz, S. (2012). The specific relationship between disgust and interest: Relevance during biology class dissections and gender differences. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.005
- Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
- Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
- Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000146
- Jansen, M., Lüdtke, O., & Schroeders, U. (2016). Evidence for a positive relation between interest and achievement: Examining between-person and within-person variation in five domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46(7), 116–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.004
- Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., Lüdtke, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2019). The dimensional structure of students’ self-concept and interest in science depends on course composition. Learning and Instruction, 60, 1–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.001.
- Jones, M. G., Childers, G., Andre, T., Corin, E. N., & Hite, R. (2018). Citizen scientists and non-citizen scientist hobbyists: Motivation, benefits, and influences. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(4), 287–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1475780
- Keith, T. Z. (2014). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling (2nd ed). Taylor & Francis.
- Kelemen-Finan, J., Scheuch, M., & Winter, S. (2018). Contributions from citizen science to science education: An examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in central Europe. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2078–2098. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1520405
- Kelly, R. P., Port, J. A., Yamahara, K. M., Martone, R. G., Lowell, N., Thomsen, P. F., Mach, M. E., Bennett, M., Prahler, E., Caldwell, M. R., & Crowder, L. B. (2014). Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management. Science, 344(6191), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251156
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. Guilford Press.
- Knogler, M. (2017). Situational interest: A proposal to enhance conceptual clarity. In P. A. O’Keefe & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), The science of interest (pp. 109–124). Springer International Publishing.
- Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43(10), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.004
- Knudsen, S. W., Ebert, R. B., Hesselsøe, M., Kuntke, F., Hassingboe, J., Mortensen, P. B., Thomsen, P. F., Sigsgaard, E. E., Hansen, B, K., Nielsen, E. E., & Møller, P. R. (2019). Species-specific detection and quantification of environmental DNA from marine fishes in the Baltic Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 510, 31–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2018.09.004
- Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647–671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355699
- Lykkegaard, E., & Ulriksen, L. (2016). Choices and changes: Eccles’ expectancy-value model and upper-secondary school students’ longitudinal reflections about their choice of a STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 701–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1156782
- Mitchell, N., Triska, M., Liberatore, A., Ashcroft, L., Weatherill, R., & Longnecker, N. (2017). Benefits and challenges of incorporating citizen science into university education. PLoS One, 12(11), e0186285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186285
- Nieswandt, M., & Horowitz, G. (2015). Undergraduate students’ interest in chemistry: The roles of task and choice. In A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 225–242). American Educational Research Association.
- Nov, O., Arazy, O., Anderson, D., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2014). Scientists@Home: What drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? PLoS One, 9(4), e90375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090375
- Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
- Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21501
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
- Price, C. A., & Lee, H.-S. (2013). Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 773–801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21090
- Pugh, K. J. (2004). Newton's laws beyond the classroom walls. Science Education, 88(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10109
- Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
- Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
- Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., & Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects [Paper presentation]. At the Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington, USA.
- Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep26034_5
- Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4
- Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 211–236). Routledge.
- Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., Wild, K.-P., & Winteler, A. (1993). Der “Fragebogen zum Studieninteresse” (FSI). The study interest questionnaire (SIQ). Diagnostica, 39(4), 335–351.
- Schneiderhan-Opel, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). How fascination for biology is associated with students’ learning in a biodiversity citizen science project. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(9), 100892. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100892
- Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. The University Of Oslo.
- Schutz, A., & Zaner, R. M. (1970). Reflections on the problem of relevance. Yale University Press.
- Silva, C., Monteiro, A. J., Manahl, C., Lostal, E., Schäfer, T., Andrade, N., Brasileiro, F., Mota, P., Serrano Sanz, F., Carrodeguas, J., & Brito, R. (2016). Cell spotting: Educational and motivational outcomes of cell biology citizen science project in the classroom. Journal of Science Communication, 15(1), A02. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15010202
- Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
- Tapola, A., Veermans, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictors and outcomes of situational interest during a science learning task. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1047–1064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9273-6
- Thomsen, P. F., Kielgast, J. O. S., Iversen, L. L., Wiuf, C., Rasmussen, M., Gilbert, M. T. P., Orlando, L., & Willerslev, E. (2012). Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology, 21(11), 2565–2573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x
- Thomsen, P. F., Møller, P. R., Sigsgaard, E. E., Knudsen, S. W., Jørgensen, O. A., Willerslev, E., & Mahon, A. R. (2016). Environmental DNA from seawater samples correlate with trawl catches of subarctic, deepwater fishes. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165252–e0165252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165252
- Thomsen, P. F., & Willerslev, E. (2015). Environmental DNA – an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 183(3), 4–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019
- Tsai, Y.-M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 460–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460
- Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec Christopher, P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In C. U. Timothy & A. K. Stuart (Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Vol. 16 Part A) (pp. 105–165). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2014). Motivating students by “Personalizing” learning around individual interests: A consideration of theory, design, and implementation issues. In S. Karabenick & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Motivational interventions (pp. 139–176). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Wals, A. E. J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583–584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515