Exploring the effects of physics explainer videos and written explanations on declarative knowledge and the illusion of understanding

References

• Acuna, S. R., Rodicio, H. G., & Sanchez, E. (2011). Fostering active processing of instructional explanations of learners with high and Low prior knowledge. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0049-y
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., & Elby, A. (2019). Beyond empirical adequacy: Learning progressions as models and their value for teachers. Cognition and Instruction, 37(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1539735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, A., & Nückles, M. (2017). Empirische Studie zu Qualitätsindikatoren für den diagnostischen Prozess [empirical studies on quality criteria for a diagnostic process]. In A. Südkamp, & A.-K. Praetorius (Eds.), Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrkräften: Theoretische und methodische Weiterentwicklungen (pp. 134–141). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, T., Waldeyer, J., & Schmiemann, P. (2021). Studienerfolg von Fachstudierenden im Anfangsstudium der Biologie. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 27(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-021-00123-4
   Google Scholar
• Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6–es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., McCrudden, M. T., Stang Lund, E., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018). Task-Oriented learning With multiple documents: Effects of topic familiarity, Author expertise, and content relevance on document selection, processing, and Use. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Leeuw, N. D., Chiu, M.-H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dahan Golan, D., Barzillai, M., & Katzir, T. (2018). The effect of presentation mode on children’s reading preferences, performance, and self-evaluations. Computers & Education, 126, 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2010). They hear, but Do Not listen: Retention for podcasted material in a classroom context. Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.488542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFleur, M. L., Davenport, L., Cronin, M., & DeFleur, M. (1992). Audience recall of news stories presented by newspaper, computer, television, and radio. Journalism Quarterly, 70(3), 585e601. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900419
   Google Scholar
• Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber, T. (2019). Auswirkungen des Vorhandenseins von Schülervorstellungen in Lernvideos auf die Verstehensillusion von Schülern [Effects oft he presence of misconceptions on students‘ illusion of understanding]. Masters‘ thesis, University of Bremen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). Gpower: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
   Google Scholar
• Findeisen, S., Horn, S., & Seifried, J. (2019). Lernen durch Videos – empirische Befunde zur Gestaltung von Erklärvideos. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/00/2019.10.01.X
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Benson, I., & Gunter, B. (1987). Memory for television commercials as a function of the channel of communication. Social Behaviour, 2(2), 105e112.
   Google Scholar
• Geelan, D. (2012). Teacher explanations. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International handbook of science education (pp. 987–999). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, M., Eid, M., & Schmitt, M. (2017). Statistik und forschungsmethoden [Statistics and research methods]. Beltz Verlagsgruppe.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, B., Furnham, A., & Leese, J. (1986). Memory for information from a party political broadcast as a function of the channel of communication. Social Behaviour, 1(2), 135e142.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsell, T., & Yuen, S. C.-Y. (2006). Video streaming in online learning. AACE Review (Formerly AACE Journal), 14(1), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
   Google Scholar
• Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2016). Learning from video modeling examples: Content kept equal, adults are more effective models than peers. Learning and Instruction, 44, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C. (2018a). A framework of effective science explanation videos informed by criteria for instructional explanations. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2441–2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9787-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C. (2018b). Towards a framework for effective instructional explanations in science teaching. Studies in Science Education, 54(54), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1598054
   Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C. (2018c). Wie gut erklären Erklärvideos? Ein Bewertungs-Leitfaden [How to rate the explaining quality of explainer videos]. Computer + Unterricht, 109, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C., & Peters, C. (2016). Exploring the explaining quality of physics online explanatory videos. European Journal of Physics, 37(6), 065705–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/6/065705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. (2009). Kommunikationskompetenz in der physik: Zur Entwicklung eines domänenspezifischen Kompetenzbegriffs [communication competence in physics: Developing a domain-specific concept]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 15, 131–153.
   Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. (2013). Students explaining science—assessment of science communication competence. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2235–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9354-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C., & Wittwer, J. (2022). Misconceptions in physics explainer videos and the illusion of understanding: An experimental study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10265-7
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Y., & List, A. (2019). Processing of texts and videos: A strategy-focused analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2014). Berechnung des Lesbarkeitsindex LIX nach Björnson [calculating the readability score LIX following Björnson]. Psychometrica. http://www.psychometrica.de/lix.html
   Google Scholar
• List, A., & Ballenger, E. E. (2019). Comprehension across mediums: The case of text and video. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 514–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-09204-9
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, S. A., & Robertson, C. L. (2012). Screencast tutorials enhance student learning of statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-Based principles for How to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. Learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21(6)), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Paik, E. S., & Schraw, G. (2013). Learning with animation and illusions of understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekdag, B., & Le Marechal, J. F. (2010). Movies in chemistry education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Sampietro, A., & Delgado, P. (2020). Using internet videos to learn about controversies: Evaluation and integration of multiple and multimodal documents by primary school students. Computers & Education, 148, 103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., & Traxler, A. L. (2017). Humanizing instructional videos in physics: When less Is more. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9677-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer Trakhman, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Berkowitz, L. E. (2019). Effects of processing time on comprehension and calibration in print and digital mediums. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1411877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., & Urhahne, D. (2021). Disentangling the effects of flipped classroom instruction in EFL secondary education: When is it effective and for whom? Learning and Instruction, 75, 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101490
   Google Scholar
• Walma van der Molen, J., & van der Voort, T. (2000). Children’s and adults’ recall of television and print news in children’s and adult news formats. Communication Research, 27(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Kersting, N., & Nemer, K. M. (2006). Help seeking in cooperative learning groups. In S. A. Karabenick, & R. S. Newman (Eds.), Help seeking in academic settings: Goals, groups, and contexts (pp. 45–88). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J. (2019). Picture this! effects of photographs, diagrams, animations, and sketching on learning and beliefs about learning from a geoscience text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Why instructional explanations often Do Not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, K., & Kratzer, V. (2015). Erklärstrukturen in selbsterstellten Erklärvideos von Kindern [explaining structures in pupils’ self-made explanation videos.]. In K. Hugger, A. Tillmann, S. Iske, J. Fromme, P. Grell, & T. Hug (Eds.), Jahrbuch medienpädagogik 12 [yearbook media pedagogy 12] (pp. 29–44). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, K., & Kulgemeyer, C. (2016). Lernen mit Videos? Erklärvideos im Physikunterricht [explainer videos in physics teaching]. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht Physik, 27(152), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, B., Tenberg, R., & Pittich, D. (2021). Erklärvideos – im naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Unterricht eine Alternative zu Texten? [explanatory videos as an alternative to text-based learning using the problem-solving methodology SPALTEN as an example?] Journal of Technical Education, 9(2), 168-187. https://doi.org/10.48513/joted.v9i2.217
   Google Scholar