Nature of science in students’ discussions on disagreement between scientists following a narrative about health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi accident

References

• Allchin, D. (2003). Scientific myth-conceptions. Science Education, 87(3), 329–351. doi:10.1002/sce.10055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. doi:10.1002/sce.20432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aune, J. E., Evans, L. L., & Boury, N. (2018). Using nonfiction narratives in an English course to teach the nature of science and its importance to communicating about science. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 1–8. Doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, A. (2006). Sharing lived experience: how upper secondary school chemistry teachers and students use narratives to make chemistry more meaningful. Stockholm Institute of Education Press (HLS förlag).
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. (2009). Risk and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 205–223. doi:10.1080/03057260903142293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, P., Williams, C. T., Witucki, A. M., & Rudge, D. W. (2021). Rosalind Franklin and the discovery of the structure of DNA using historical narratives to help students understand Nature of Science. Science & Education, 30(3), 659–692. doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00188-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Dagher, Z. R., & McDonald, C. V. (2019). Contributions of the family resemblance approach to nature of science in science education: A review of emergent research and development. Science & Education, 28(3-5), 311–328. Doi: 10.1007/s11191-019-00052-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2012). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 1451–1469). Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_93
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. (1993). Promoting equitable collaboration between university researchers and school teachers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 6(4), 341–357. doi:10.1080/0951839930060406
   Google Scholar
• Forato, T. C. D., Martins, R. D., & Pietrocola, M. (2012). History and nature of science in high school: Building up parameters to guide educational materials and strategies. Science & Education, 21(5), 657–682. Doi: 10.1007/s11191-011-9419-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese Klassen, C. (2014). A methodology for analyzing science stories. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 45(3-4), 153–165. doi:10.1007/s10780-015-9232-z
   Google Scholar
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Klassen, S., & Froese Klassen, C. (2012). Encouraging a ‘romantic understanding’ of science: The effect of the Nikola Tesla story. Science & Education, 21(8), 1111–1138. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9417-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamza, K., Palm, O., Palmqvist, J., Piqueras, J., & Wickman, P.-O. (2018). Hybridization of practices in teacher-researcher collaboration. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 170–186. Doi: 10.1177/1474904117693850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerman, A., & Wickman, P.-O. (2015). Towards a teachers’ professional discipline: Shared responsibility for didactic models in research and practice. In P. Burnard, B.-M. Apelgren, & N. Cabaroglu (Eds.), Transformative teacher research (pp. 167–179). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Joffredo-Le Brun, S., Morellato, M., Sensevy, G., & Quilio, S. (2018). Cooperative engineering as a joint action. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 187–208. Doi: 10.1177/1474904117690006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P.-O. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 281–291). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, S. (2009). The construction and analysis of a science story: A proposed methodology. Science & Education, 18(3-4), 401–423. Doi: 10.1007/s11191-008-9141-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of Nature of Science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science (pp. 301–317). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol (pp. 2). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., Clough, M., & Olson, J. (2007). Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives. Science & Education, 16(3-5), 313–334. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9024-z
   Google Scholar
• Ohba, T., Ishikawa, T., Nagai, H., Tokonami, S., Hasegawa, A., & Suzuki, G. (2020). Reconstruction of residents’ thyroid equivalent doses from internal radionuclides after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 3639. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60453-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? – A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. Doi:10.1002/tea.10105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, S. (2013). Critical science literacy: What citizens and journalists need to know to make sense of science. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(5-6), 138–145. doi: 10.1177/0270467614529707
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. (2005). Improving the development and warranting of good practice in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 407–426.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1–44. doi:10.1080/03057260108560166
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000119456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, L., Hamza, K., Arvanitis, L., Lundegard, I., Wojcik, A., & Haglund, K. (2021). Socioscientific issues in science education: An opportunity to incorporate education about risk and risk analysis? Risk Analysis, 41(12), 2209–2219. doi: 10.1111/risa.13737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, L., Hamza, K. M., Enghag, M., Lundegård, I., Arvanitis, L., Haglund, K., & Wojcik, A. (2019). Teaching and discussing about risk: seven elements of potential significance for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1271–1286. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1606961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer, H., & Guerra, A. (2015). Electricity and vital force: Discussing the nature of science through a historical narrative. Science & Education, 24(4), 409–434. doi: 10.1007/s11191-014-9718-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S. (2016). Childhood and adolescent thyroid cancer in Fukushima after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: 5 years on. Clinical Oncology, 28(4), 263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. Swedish Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-Based Research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001005
   Google Scholar
• Tokonami, S., Hosoda, M., Akiba, S., Sorimachi, A., Kashiwakura, I., & Balonov, M. (2012). Thyroid doses for evacuees from the Fukushima nuclear accident. Scientific Reports, 2(1), 507. doi: 10.1038/srep00507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsuda, T., Tokinobu, A., Yamamoto, E., & Suzuki, E. (2016). Thyroid cancer detection by ultrasound among residents ages 18 years and younger in Fukushima, Japan: 2011 to 2014. Epidemiology, 27(3), 316–322. doi: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815–832. doi:10.1080/09500690010016058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeford, R., Auvinen, A., Gent, R. N., Jacob, P., Kesminiene, A., Laurier, D., … Zhang, W. (2016). Re: Thyroid cancer among young people in Fukushima. Epidemiology, 27(3), e20–e21. doi: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601–623. doi:10.1002/sce.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik, A., Hamza, K., Lundegård, I., Enghag, M., Haglund, K., Arvanitis, L., & Schenk, L. (2019). Educating about radiation risks in high schools: towards improved public understanding of the complexity of low-dose radiation health effects. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 58(1), 13–20. doi: 10.1007/s00411-018-0763-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasumura, S., Hosoya, M., Yamashita, S., Kamiya, K., Abe, M., Akashi, M., … Ozasa, K. (2012). Study protocol for the Fukushima Health Management Survey. Journal of Epidemiology, 22(5), 375–383. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20120105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. doi: 10.1002/sce.10025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar