The productive interplay between student-student and teacher-student dialogic interactions and the affordances of student generated explanatory drawings to understand plate tectonics

References

• ACARA. (2015). Australian Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. (2016). Science. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/science/
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J., Chin, T. Y., & Tan, P. H. (2020). Talking to learn science: Examining the role of teacher talk moves around visual representations to learn science. Learning, Research and Practice, 6(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750671
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, G. (2018). Teacher discursive moves: Conceptualising a schema of dialogic discourse in science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1891–1912. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1514543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-Y., Lin, T.-J., Lee, M.-H., Lee, S. W.-Y., Lin, T.-C., Tan, A.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020). A meta-analysis on the relationship between school characteristics and student outcomes in science and maths – evidence from large-scale studies. Studies in Science Education, 56(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1735758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., O'Donnell, A., & Jinks, T. (2000). The structure of discouse in collaborative learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, D., & Libarkin, J. C. (2022). Using conceptual metaphor within the model of educational reconstruction to identify students'alternative conceptions and improve instruction: A plate tectonics example. Journal of Geoscience Education, 70(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2021.1983941
   Google Scholar
• Department_for_Education. (2013). Science programmes of study: Key stage 3 national curriculum in England. GOV.UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335174/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_Science_220714.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J. E. (2015). Drawing to learn: How producing graphical representations enhances scientific thinking. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000037
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., Hargraves, L., Comber, C., Wall, D., & Pell, T. (1999). Changes in patterns of teacher interaction in primary classrooms: 1976-1996. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250103
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. (2016). Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D. (2005). The effects of different learning tasks on model-building in plate tectonics: Diagramming versus explaining. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.444
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J. C., & Kurdziel, J. P. (2006). Ontology and the teaching of earth system science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3), 408–413. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-54.3.408
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Bateman, K., Gall, H., Tanis-Ozcelik, A., Webb, A., & Furman, T. (2019). Mapping the increasing sophistication of students’ understandings of plate tectonics: A learning progressions approach. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1550972
   Google Scholar
• McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). A sustained multidimensional conceptual change intervention in grade 9 and 10 science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1725174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2021). What students’ diagrams reveal about their sense-making of plate tectonics in lower secondary science. International Journal of Science Education, 43(16), 2684–2705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1983922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2022). Analysis of students’ diagrams explaining scientific phenomena. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1225–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10004-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in science classrooms. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newberry, M., Gilbert, J. K., & Consortium, C. H. S. (2011). The thinking frames approach. Primary Science Teaching Trust. Retrieved June 7, 2013, from https://pstt.org.uk/resources/cpd-units/the-thinking-frames-approach
   Google Scholar
• NGSS. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• Orion, N., & Libarkin, J. C. (2014). Earth system science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 481–496). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raia, F. (2008). Causality in complex dynamic systems: A challenge in earth systems science education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-56.1.81
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S. (2021). Discourse strategies for science teaching and learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Aranda, G. (2015). Expert teachers’ discursive moves in science classroom interactive talk. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9617-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., Aranda, G., Ferguson, J., & Gorur, R. (2020). Drawing to reason and learn in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hubber, P. (2018). Representation construction as a core science disciplinary literacy. In K. S. Tang, & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 301–317). Routledge.
   Google Scholar