Trans/languaging and the triadic dialogue in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms

References

• Bailey, B. 2007 “Heteroglossia and Boundaries.” In Bilingualism: A Social Approach, edited by M. Heller, 257–276. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1981. Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.M.W., and J.K. Gilbert. 2015. “Students’ Visualization of Diagrams Representing the Human Circulatory System: The Use of Spatial Isomorphism and Representational Conventions.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (1): 136–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2016. “Teaching for Transfer in Multilingual School Contexts.” In Bilingual and Multilingual Education (Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 5), edited by O. García, and A.M.Y. Lin. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., and Li Wei. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., and A.M.Y. Lin, 2016. “Translanguaging in Bilingual Education.” In Bilingual and Multilingual Education (Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 5), edited by O. García, and A.M.Y. Lin. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1993. “Towards a Language-Based Theory of Learning.” Linguistics and Education 5 (2): 93–116.
   Google Scholar
• Haneda, M. 2005. “Some Functions of Triadic Dialogue in the Classroom: Examples from L2 Research.” Canadian Modern Language Review 62 (2): 313–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneda, M., and W. Gordon. 2008. “Learning an Additional Language through Dialogic Enquiry.” Language and Education 22 (2): 114–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneda, M., and G. Wells. 2010. “Learning Science through Dialogic Enquiry: Is It Beneficial for English-As-Additional-Language Students?” International Journal of Educational Research 49 (1): 10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J.L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. Westport, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J.L. 2002. “Multimedia Genres for Science Education and Scientific Literacy.” In Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages, edited by M. Schleppegrell and M.C. Colombi, 21–44. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A.M.Y. 2007. “What's the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’? Activity Theory, Conversation Analysis and Analysis of Pedagogical Practices.” Pedagogies 2 (2): 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A.M.Y. 2012. “Multilingual and Multimodal Resources in L2 English Content Classrooms.” In English – A Changing Medium for Education, edited by C. Leung and B. Street, 79–103. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, AM.Y. 2015. “Conceptualizing the Potential Role of L1 in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” Language, Culture and Curriculum 28 (1): 74–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, AM.Y., and Y. Wu. 2015. “‘May I Speak Cantonese?’ – Co-constructing a Scientific Proof in an EFL Junior Secondary Science Classroom.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18 (3): 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, YY., and E. Macaro. 2012. “The Medium of Instruction and Classroom Interaction: Evidence from Hong Kong Secondary Schools.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (1): 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.Y., and E. Macaro. 2015. “Getting Used to CLIL: What can Classroom Interaction Reveal?” Language Learning Journal 43 (3): 239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Merce, N., L. Dawes, and J.K. Staarman. 2009. “Dialogic Teaching in the Primary Science Classroom.” Language and Education 23 (4): 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E.F., and P.H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., and G. Wells. 2000. “What's the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’? An Investigation of Teacher-student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 376–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, D., A.B.M. Tsui, and F. Marton. 2001. “Two Faces of the Reed Relay.” In Teaching the Chinese Learner, edited by D. Watkins and J. Biggs, 135–160. Hong Kong: CERC, The University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., C. Dalton-Puffer, and A. Llinares. 2013. “European Research on CLIL Classroom Discourse.” International Journal of Immersion and Content Based Education 1 (1): 70–100.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, C., and S. Michaels. 2007. “When is Dialogue ‘Dialogic’?” Human Development 50 (5): 275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, C. 1999. Learning Through Language in Early Childhood. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and J. Martin. 2012. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., J. Ametller, L. Dawes, J.K. Staarman, and N. Mercer. 2007. “An Investigation of Dialogic Teaching in Science Classrooms.” Paper presented at National Association of Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, New Orleans, April 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., and S. Lapkin. 2013. “A Vygotskian Sociocultural Perspective on Immersion Education: The L1/L2 debate.” Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education 1 (1): 101–129.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 2007. “Semiotic Mediation, Dialogue and the Construction of Knowledge.” Human Development 50 (5): 244–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar