Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms

References

• Adler, D.A. 1995. “Don't Be an Uncle Max.” In Birthday Surprises: Ten Great Stories to Unwrap, edited by J. Hurwitz, 35–43. New York: Morrow Junior Books.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, M., E. Rougle, E. Kaiser, and S. Caughlan. 2004. “Closing the Gap Between Concept and Practice: Toward More Dialogic Discussion in the Language Arts Classroom.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 47 (4): 312–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 2005. “Culture, Dialogue and Learning: Notes on an Emerging Pedagogy.” Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, July.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 2006. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk (3rd ed.). York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 2008. Essays on Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D.E., and D.A. Hayes. 1989. “Classroom Discussion of Content Area Reading Assignments: An Intervention Study.” Reading Research Quarterly 24: 305–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applebee, A.N., J.A. Langer, M. Nystrand, and A. Gamoran. 2003. “Discussion-Based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (Vol. 8). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I.L., M.G. McKeown, C. Sandora, L. Kucan, and J. Worthy. 1996. “Questioning the Author: A Year-Long Classroom Implementation to Engage Students with Text.” The Elementary School Journal 96 (4): 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, J., and D. Berthelsen. 2006. “Personal Epistemology and Relational Pedagogy in Early Childhood Teacher Education Programs.” Early Years 26 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1080/09575140500507785
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, M.M., P.A. Alexander, and P.K. Murphy. 2002. “Beliefs About Schooled Knowledge: Domain Specific or Domain General?” Contemporary Educational Psychology 27 (3): 415–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. 1993. Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K.-W., and R.G. Elliott. 2004. “Relational Analysis of Personal Epistemology and Conceptions about Teaching and Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (8): 817–831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C.A., L.A. Buckland, and A.L.A. Samarapungavan. 2011. “Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments from Philosophy and Psychology.” Educational Psychologist 46 (3): 141–167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. 2002. “Epistemological World Views, Subject Matter Contexts, and the Institutional Setting of Teaching.” Issues in Education 8 (2): 149. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=9750377&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., D. Joseph, and K. Bielaczyc. 2004. “Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 13: 15–42.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L., A. Porter, M. Garet, K. Yoon, and B.F. Birman. 2002. “Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-Year Longitudinal Study.” Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (2): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M.S., A.C. Porter, L. Desimone, B.F. Birman, and K.S. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–945. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3202507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C., and R. Gallimore. 1991. “Changing Teaching Takes More than a One-Shot Workshop.” Educational Leadership 49 (3): 69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, G. 2003. Clueless in Academe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. 2007. “A Framework for Facilitating Classroom Dialogue.” Teaching Philosophy 30 (1): 59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W.D., and L.E. Valli. 1999. “The Essentials of Effective Professional Development: A New Consensus.” In Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook for Policy and Practice, edited by L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes, 127–150. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heintz, A., C. Borsheim, S. Caughlan, M.M. Juzwik, and M.B. Sherry. 2010. “Video-Based Response & Revision: Dialogic Instruction Using Video and Web 2.0 Technologies.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 10 (2): 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., N. Mercer, and P. Warwick. 2011. “A Dialogic Inquiry Approach to Working with Teachers in Developing Classroom Dialogue.” Teachers College Record 113 (9): 1906–1959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B.K. 2001. “Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching.” Educational Psychology Review 13 (4): 353–383. doi:10.1023/A:1011965830686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. 1996. “Thank You, M'am.” In Short Stories by Langston Hughes, edited by A. S. Harper, 223–226. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L., M. Meiers, and A. Beavis. 2005. “Factors Affecting the Impact of Professional Development Programs on Teachers’ Knowledge, Practice, Student Outcomes & Efficacy.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 13 (10).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P., H. Woodside-Jiron, and J. Day. 2001. “Teaching and Learning Literate Epistemologies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (1): 223–233. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juzwik, M.M., M.B. Sherry, S. Caughlan, A. Heintz, and C. Borsheim-Black. 2012. “Supporting Dialogically Organized Instruction in an English Teacher Preparation Program: Video-based, Web 2.0-Mediated Response and Revision Pedagogy.” Teachers College Record 114 (3): 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, N.-H., and C.S. Wallace. 2005. “Secondary Science Teachers' use of Laboratory Activities: Linking Epistemological Beliefs, Goals, and Practices.” Science education 89 (1): 140–165. doi:10.1002/sce.20013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. 2013. “Developing Philosophical Facilitation: A Toolbox of Philosophical Moves.” In Philosophy in Schools: An Introduction for Philosophers and Teachers, edited by S. Goering, N. Shudak, and T. Wartenberg. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, P.M., and K.S. Kitchener. 1994. Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kucan, L. 2007. “Insights from Teachers Who Analyzed Transcripts of Their Own Classroom Discussions.” The Reading Teacher 61 (3): 228–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucan, L. 2009. “Engaging Teachers in Investigating Their Teaching as a Linguistic Enterprise: The Case of Comprehension Instruction in the Context of Discussion.” Reading Psychology 39: 51–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., and A. Crowell. 2011. “Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking.” Psychological Science 22: 545–552. doi:10.1177/0956797611402512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., and W. Udell. 2003. “The Development of Argument Skills.” Child Development 74 (5): 1245–1260. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., and J. Snell. 2014. Better than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, M., A.M. Sharp, and F.S. Oscanyon. 1980. Philosophy in the Classroom. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M.G., and I.L. Beck. 2004. “Transforming Knowledge into Professional Development Resources.” Elementary School Journal 104 (5): 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and L. Dawes. 2008. The Value of Exploratory Talk.” In Exploring Talk in School, edited by N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson, 55–71. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, and J.K. Staarman. 2009. “Dialogic Teaching in the Primary Science Classroom.” Language and Education 23 (4): 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Socio-Cultural Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., and C. O'Connor. 2015. “Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: Professional Development Approaches for Academically Productive Discussion.” In Socializing Intelligence through Talk and Dialogue, edited by L.B. Resnick, C.A. Asterhan, and S.N. Clarke, 347–362. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Modigliani, L. 2011. “Too Risky for Kids.” Scholastic News Edition 5 (6): 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Modigliani, L. 2013. “The Right to Fight.” Scholastic News Edition 5 (6): 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P.K., A. Soter, I.A.G. Wilkinson, M.N. Hennessey, and J.F. Alexander. 2009. “Examining the Effects of Classroom Discussion on Students’ Comprehension of Text: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (3): 740–764. doi:10.1037/a0015576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & The Council of Chief State School Officers. 2010. Common Core State Standards: Appendix A. Research Supporting Key Elements of the Standards. Washington D.C.: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, K., R.C. Anderson, M. Waggoner, and B. Rowel. 2007. “Using Literature Discussions to Reason through Real Life Dilemmas: A Journey Taken by One Teacher and Her Fourth-Grade Students.” In Talking Texts: Knowing the World through the Evolution of Instructional Discourse, edited by R. Horowitz, 187–206. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E.M., G.M. Sinatra, and A. Poliquin. 2008. “Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (15): 1977–1999. doi:10.1080/09500690701545919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., L. Wu, A. Gamoran, S. Zeiser, and D.A. Long. 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes 35 (2): 135–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, D.R., K.E. Diamond, M.R. Burchinal, and M.J. Koehler. 2010. “Effects of an Early Literacy Professional Development Intervention on Head Start Teachers and Children.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102: 299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., L. Kuo, A. Clark, B. Miller, M. Jadallah, R.C. Anderson, and K. Nguyen-Jahiel. 2009. “Collaborative Reasoning: A Dialogic Approach to Group Discussions.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1080/03057640802701952
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., and I.A.G. Wilkinson. 2015. “Professional Development in Dialogic Teaching: Helping Teachers Promote Argument Literacy in their Classrooms.” In Sage Handbook of Learning, edited by D. Scott and E. Hargreaves, 219–232. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitiskaya, A., I.A.G. Wilkinson, J. Oyler, K. Bourdage, and A. Sykes. 2016. “Using the Argumentation Rating Tool to Support Teacher Facilitation of Inquiry Dialogue in Elementary Language Arts Classrooms.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V., and P. Placier. 2001. “Teacher Change.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by V. Richardson , 4th ed., 905–947. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, W., and C. Goldenberg. 1996. “Four Primary Teachers Work to Define Constructivism and Teacher-Directed Learning: Implications for Teacher Assessment.” The Elementary School Journal 97 (2): 139–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, W., C. Goldenberg, and J. Hamann. 1992. “Instructional Conversations Beget Instructional Conversations.” Teaching and Teacher Education 8 (2): 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. 2001. “Current Themes and Future Directions in Epistemological Research: A Commentary.” Educational Psychology Review, 13: 451–464. doi:10.1023/A:1011922015665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F., F. Hardman, K. Wall, and M. Mroz. 2004. “Interactive Whole Class Teaching in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 395–411. doi:10.1080/01411920410001689706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splitter, L.J., and A.M. Sharp. 1996. “The Practice of Philosophy in the Classroom.” In Studies in Philosophy for Children: Pixie, edited by R.F. Reed and A.M. Sharp, 285–314. Madrid: Ediciones De La Torre.
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D.J., K.B. Givvin, J.M. Salmon, and V.L. MacGyvers. 2001. “Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Related to Mathematics Instruction.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (2): 213–226. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S.E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1968. Thought and Language (Newly Revised, Translated, and Edited by Alex Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2002. “Construction or Obstruction: Teacher Talk and Learner Involvement in the EFL Classroom.” Language Teaching Research 6 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1191/1362168802lr095oa
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. 1996. Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. 1998. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2008. “Reason and Dialogue in Education.” In The Transformation of Learning: Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, edited by B. van Oers, E. Elbers, R. van der Veer, and W. Wardekker, 273–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., N. Mercer, and L. Dawes. 1999. “From Social Interaction to Individual Reasoning: An Empirical Investigation of a Possible Sociocultural Model of Cognitive Development.” Learning and Instruction 9 (6): 493–516. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R.C., L. Darling-Hammond, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. “Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock, M.P. 2005. “Cognitive Bases for Effective Participation in Democratic Institutions: Argument Skill and Juror Reasoning.” Theory & Research in Social Education 33 (1): 73–102. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=16610770&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock, M.P. 2006. “Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation.” Informal Logic 26 (1): 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock, M.P., Y. Neuman, and A. Glassner. 2006. “Identification of Informal Reasoning Fallacies as a Function of Epistemological Level, Grade Level, and Cognitive Ability.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (2): 327–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. 2002. “Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers.” Review of Educational Research 72 (2): 131–175. doi:10.3102/00346543072002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P.K. 1997. “A Secondary Analysis of Claims Regarding the Reflective Judgment Interview: Internal Consistency, Sequentiality and Intra-individual Differences in Ill-Structured Problem Solving.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by J.C. Smart, 245–314. Edison, NJ: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K.S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement ( Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
   Google Scholar