Adolescents’ critical, multimodal analysis of social media self-representation

References

• Albers P, Vasquez VM, Harste JC. 2018. Critically reading image in digital spaces and digital times. In: Mills K, Stornaiuolo A, Smith A, Pandya JZ, editors. Handbook of writing, literacies and education in digital cultures. New York: Routledge. p. 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes R. 1997. The eiffel tower. In: Barthes R, editor. The eiffel tower: and other mythologies. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF. 1982. A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychol Bull. 91(1):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell BT. 2019. “You take fifty photos, delete forty nine and use one”: A qualitative study of adolescent image-sharing practices on social media. Int J Child-Comput Interact. 20(2019):64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer J, Kress G. 2010. Changing text: A social semiotic analysis of textbooks. Design Learn. 3(1-2):10–29. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.26
   Google Scholar
• Brown CW. 2022. Taking action through redesign: Norwegian EFL learners engaging in critical visual literacy practices. J Visual Literacy. 41(2):91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1994732
   Google Scholar
• Cho H, Cannon J, Lopez R, Li W. 2022. Social media literacy: A conceptual framework. New Media Soc,. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope B, Kalantzis M. 2009. “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedag An Inter J. 4(3):164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
   Google Scholar
• Cummins J, Early M. 2011. Identity texts: The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools. London: Trentham Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Elf NF, Gilje Ø, Olin-Scheller C, Slotte A. 2018. Nordisk status og forskningsperspektiver i L1: Multimodalitet i styredokumenter og klasseromsprakss. In: Rogne M, Waage LR, editors. Multimodalitet i skole og fritidstekstar. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, LNU. p. 71–104.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore PG, Coleman JM. 2019. Middle School Students’ Analysis of Political Memes to Support Critical Media Literacy. J Adolescent & Adult Lit. 63(1):29–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48555651. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley Y. 2017. Critical literacy. In: Street BV, May S, editors. Literacies and language education. 3rd ed. Cham: Springer. p. 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad O, Silseth K. 2022. Transformation and unresolved tension. Children, school and technology. In: Kumpulainen K, Kajamaa A, Erstad O, Mäkitalo Å, Drotner K, Jakobsdóttir S, editors. Nordic childhoods in the digital age. The Netherlands: Routledge. p. 30–40. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003145257.
   Google Scholar
• Freebody P, Luke A. 2003. Literacy as engaging with new forms of life: The ‘four roles’ model. In Bull G, Anstey M, editors. The literacy lexicon. Sydney: Prentice Hall. p. 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia A, Seglem R, Share J. 2013. Transforming teaching and learning through critical media literacy pedagogy. LL. 6(2):109–124. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v6i2.608
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E. 2012. Applied thematic analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harste JC, Albers P. 2012. “I’m Riskin’ It” Teachers take on consumerism. J Adolescent Adult Lit. 56(5):381–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janks H. 2010. Literacy and power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janks H, Dixon K, Ferreira A, Granville S, Newfield D. 2013. Doing critical literacy: texts and activities for students and teachers. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118627.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly DM, Currie DH. 2021. Beyond stereotype analysis in critical media literacy: case study of reading and writing gender in pop music videos. Gender and Education. 33(6):676–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1831443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress G, van Leeuwen T. 2021. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim FV, Nguyen TTH. 2022. ‘If you have the freedom, you don’t need to even think hard’ – ­considerations in designing for student agency through digital multimodal composing in the language classroom. Lang Educ. 37(4):409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2107875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maagerø E, Tønnessen ES. 2014. Multimodal tekstkompetanse [Multimodal textual competence]. Kristiansand: Portal forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Machin D, Mayr A. 2012. How to do critical discourse analysis: a multimodal introduction. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mantei J, Kervin L. 2016. Re-examining “Redesign” in critical literacy lessons with grade 6 students. ELR. 5(3):83–97. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v5n3p83
   Google Scholar
• Mills KA. 2015. Doing digital composition on the social web. In: Cope B, Kalantzis M, editors. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: learning by design. London: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 172–185.
   Google Scholar
• Mills KA. 2016. Literacy theories for the digital age. Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mills KA, Unsworth L. 2018. iPad animations: powerful multimodal practices for adolescent literacy and emotional language. J Adolescent & Adult Lit. 61(6):609–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagle J. 2018. Twitter, cyber-violence, and the need for a critical social media literacy in teacher education: A review of the literature. Teach Teacher Educ. 76:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The New London Group. 2000. A pedagogy of multiliteracies designing social futures. In: Cope B, Kalantzis M, editors. Multiliteracies. literacy learning and the design of social futures. Cambridge: Routledge. p. 9–37.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2020a. Curriculum in the subject Norwegian [Læreplan i norsk].https://www.udir.no/lk20/nor01-06.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2020b. Core curriculum – values and principles for primary and secondary education. https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/om-overordnet-del/?lang=eng.
   Google Scholar
• Pandya JZ, Ávila, J, editors. 2014. Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plomp T. 2006. Educational design research: An introduction. In: Plomp T, Nieveen N, editors. Educational design research. Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). p. 11–50.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, J., McLean, S.A., Rodgers, R.F. 2022. “My critical filter buffers your app filter”: social media literacy as a protective factor for body image. Body Image, 40:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettberg JW. 2014. Seeing ourselves through technology: How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see and shape ourselves. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes L, Mills KA, Wallace E. 2022. Boys’ gaming identities and opportunities for learning. Learn Media Technol. 47(2):163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1936017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share J, Mamikonyan T. 2020. Preparing English teachers with critical media literacy for the digital age. Contemp Issues Technol Teacher Educ. 20(1):37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Snow C, Moje E. 2010. Why is everyone talking about adolescent literacy? Phi Delta Kappan. 91(6):66–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009100616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart OG, Scharber C, Share J, Crampton A. 2021. Critical media production. In: Pandya JZ, Mora RA, Alford J, Golden NA, de Roock RS, editors. The handbook of critical literacies. New York: Routledge. p. 105–115. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023425.
   Google Scholar
• Stornaiuolo A, Hull G, Hall M. 2018. Cosmopolitan practices, networks, and flows of literacies. In: Mills KA, Stornaiuolo A, Smith A, Pandya JZ, editors. Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures. New York: Routledge. p. 13–25. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315465258.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth L. 2013. Point of view in picture books and animated movie adaptations. Scan. 32(1):28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen T, Jewitt C. 2001. Handbook of visual analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen T. 2021. Multimodality and identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen T. 2017. Multimodal literacy. Viden Om Literacy. 21:4–10. https://www.videnomlaesning.dk/tidsskrift/tidsskrift-nr-21-multimodale-tekster/
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen T. 2005. Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez VM, Janks H, Comber B. 2019. Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Lang Arts. 96(5):300–311. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201930093
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez VM, Tate SL, Harste JC. 2013. Negotiating critical literacies with teachers. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veum A, Undrum LVM. 2018. The selfie as a global discourse. Discourse Soc. 29(1):86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517725979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veum A, Siljan HH, Maagerø E. 2020. Who am I? How newly arrived immigrant students construct themselves through multimodal texts. Scand J Educ Res. 65(6):1004–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar