“Truth or consequences”: a feminist critical policy analysis of the STEM crisis

References

• Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards for states, by states: Development overview. Retrieved January 8, 2014, from http://www.nextgenscience.org/development-overview
   Google Scholar
• Achieve. (2014). About us. Retrieved January 8, 2014, from http://www.achieve.org/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N. (1997). Toward a curriculum of resiliency: Gender, race, adolescence and schooling. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 1–42). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• America COMPETES Act. (2007). United States Senate. Retrieved December 15, 2012, from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr2272eas/pdf/BILLS-110hr2272eas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI). (2006). Leading the world in innovation. Domestic Policy Council, Office of Science and Technology Policy. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/stateoftheunion/2006/aci/aci06-booklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anft, M. (2013, November 11). The STEM crisis: Reality or myth? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://chronicle.com/article/The-STEM-Crisis-Reality-or/142879/
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (2007). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new Mestiza (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
   Google Scholar
• Barias, S. (2006, April 1). Crazy about competitiveness: US Congress and White House look to boost science and technology education. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/innovation/crazy-about-competitiveness
   Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E. M. (1997). Lesbian existence and the challenge to normative constructions of the academy. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from post-secondary education (pp. 141–155). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (2005). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (1995). Policy as dialogue: Feminist administrators working for educational change. Gender & Education, 7, 293–313.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (1997). Level playing field? Feminist observations on global/local articulations of the re-gendering and restructuring of educational work. International Review of Education, 43, 439–461.10.1023/A:1003038021606
   Google Scholar
• California STEM Learning Network. (2012). STEM at a glance. Retrieved April 21, 2013, from http://cslnet.org/what-is-stem/
   Google Scholar
• Cammarota, J. (2008). Sueños Americanos: Barrio youth negotiate social and cultural identities. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins Act). (2006). US Department of Education. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/sectech/leg/perkins/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Strohl, J. (2010). Help wanted: Projections of jobs and education. Requirements through 2018. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved April 21, 2013, from www9.georgetown.edu/grad/.../HelpWanted.ExecutiveSummary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Charette, R. N. (2013, August 30). The STEM crisis is a myth: Forget the dire predictions of a looming shortfall of scientists, technologists, engineers, and mathematicians. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-is-a-myth
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R. (2000). Rodrigo’s sixth chronicle: Intersections, essences, and the dilemma of social reform. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 250–260). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). (1965). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/legislation.html
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, L. (2000). The discursive framing of sexual harassment in a university community. Gender and Education, 12, 293–307.10.1080/713668301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. E. (1993). The man question: Visions of subjectivity in feminist theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feuer, M. G. (2011, August 9). The real ‘S and T’ crisis. The Huffington Post. Retrieved December 15, 2013, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-michael-j-feuer/the-real-s-and-t-crisis_b_922606.html
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019924264X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982/1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. P. (2000). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 261–274). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Board of Higher Education (IBHE). (2009). Illinois public agenda for college and career success. Retrieved April 21, 2013, from http://www.ibhe.state.il.us/masterPlanning/materials/070109_PublicAgenda.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (IL DOCEO). (2012). Illinois pathways, science, technology, engineering, and math. Retrieved April 21, 2013, from http://www.illinoisworknet.com/NR/rdonlyres/FE128B2C-6F2F-4ED7-B3BC-790C551F0412/0/ILPathwaysLaunchEventFINALV2_Feb_9_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Irizarry, J. G. (2011). The Latinization of U.S. schools: Successful teaching and learning in shifting cultural contexts. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Marie, G., & Mansfield, K. C. (2013). Race and racial discrimination in schools: School leaders’ courageous conversations. In J. S. Brooks & N. W. Arnold (Eds.), Anti-racist school leadership: Toward equity in education for America’s students (pp. 19–36). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., Farkas, T., & Brown, C. S. (2012). Adolescent girls' experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 41, 268–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, K. C. (2008). Examining the politics of education: A critical analysis of the French ban on the hijab in public schools. Intersections: Women’s and Gender Studies in Review across Disciplines, 6, 76–88. The University of Texas Press. Retrieved from http://www.intersectionsjournal.com/issues/Intersections_issue_6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, K. C., & Newcomb, W. S. (2014). Student identities matter: A review of the research with implications for ethical leadership. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 8(2).
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, K. C., Welton, A., & Lee, P. L. (2011). Women Leading Education Network: An opportunity for dialogic border crossings and mentoring. In H. Macha, C. Fahrenwald, & Q. J. Bauer (Eds.), Gender and education – Towards new strategies of leadership and power (pp. 23–29). Berlin, Stuttgart: epubli, Holtzbrinck Verlagsgruppe.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, K. C., Welton, A., Lee, P., & Young, M. D. (2010). The lived experiences of female educational leadership doctoral students. Journal of Educational Administration, 48, 727–740.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. (1997). Dismantling and reconstructing policy analysis. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 1–42). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. (1999). Researching the margins: Feminist critical policy analysis. Educational Policy, 13, 59–76.10.1177/0895904899131006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. (2000). Policy discourse analysis: Negotiating gender equity. Journal of Education Policy, 15, 125–156.10.1080/026809300285863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Young, M. D. (2006). Gender and methodology. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and education (pp. 63–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mawhinney, H. B. (1997). Institutionalizing women’s voices, not their echoes, through feminist policy analysis of difference. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 216–238). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2010). Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Retrieved December 15, 2012, from http://datacenter.spps.org/uploads/sotw_a_nation_at_risk_1983.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board Report. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012, from www.nsf.gov/statistics/seindl2
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, V. (2005). Early millennial feminist qualitative research: Challenges and contours. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 235–278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. H. (1997). A model for gender-inclusive school science: Lessons from feminist scholarship. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 185–200). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M., & Ward, E. R. (2001). The roaring silence: Feminist revisions in the educational policy literature. Review of Policy Research, 18, 46–64.10.1111/ropr.2001.18.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). ‘Bodies are dangerous’: Using feminist genealogy as policy studies methodology. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 145–159.10.1080/0268093022000043083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F. O. (2007, April 1). Who cares whether Johnny knows science?: Economic growth depends on having top-flight researchers, not on meeting the general technical standard of the school population. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/who-cares-whether-johnny-knows-science
   Google Scholar
• Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddick, S. (1989). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schalin, J. (2012a). A failure of vision: The United States has been making education policies based on false assumptions. The John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://www.popecenter.org/commentaries/article.html?id=2702
   Google Scholar
• Schalin, J. (2012b). The myth of STEM labor shortages: Despite what the conventional wisdom says, U.S. colleges are producing too many graduates in many scientific and technical fields. The John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://www.popecenter.org/commentaries/article.html?id=2701
   Google Scholar
• Stage, F. K. (1997). Reframing research, informing policy: Another view of women in the mathematics/science pipeline. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from post-secondary education (pp. 99–121). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012a). Most new jobs: 20 occupations with the highest projected numeric change in employment. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/print/most-new-jobs.htm
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012b). Fastest growing occupations: 20 occupations with the highest percent change of employment between 2010–20. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/print/fastest-growing.htm
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Commerce. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. US Department of Commerce, Economics, and Statistics Administration. Retrieved April 21, 2013, from http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/stemfinalyjuly14_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Commerce. (2012). The competitiveness and innovative capacity of the United States. Retrieved November 24, 2013, from http://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2012/january/competes_010511_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (2009). Achievement gaps: How Black and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009455
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (2013a). ESEA flexibility. Retrieved January 7, 2014, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-flexibility/index.html
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (2013b). California office to reform education: Local agencies’ request for waivers under section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/eseaflex/approved-requests/corerequestfullredacted.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, R. R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Department of Education (VADOE). (2010, September). Virginia’s college and career readiness initiative. VADOE electronic archives retrieved from http://www.doe.virginia.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Department of Education (VADOE). (2012). Virginia STEM-H TRACT: Training readiness and academics for careers and transfer. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from http://www.education.virginia.gov/Docs/VirginiaSTEMProposal9-6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (2006). Towards a capability-based theory of social justice for education policy-making. Journal of Education Policy, 21, 163–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, L. (1997). Gender and the reports: The case of the missing piece. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 73–90). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• White House Brief. (2009). President Obama launches “Educate to Innovate” campaign for excellence in science, technology, engineering & math (Stem) education. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. Retrieved August 7, 2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-launches-educate-innovate-campaign-excellence-science-technology-en
   Google Scholar
• White House Council on Women and Girls. (2011). Women in STEM: An opportunity to improve U.S. competitiveness. Retrieved August 7, 2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/08/04/women-stem-opportunity-improve-us-competitiveness
   Google Scholar
• White House Office of Science and Technology. (n.d). Women and Stem. Retrieved August 7, 2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/women
   Google Scholar
• Win, J., & Wilson, B. (1997). Improving girls’ educational outcomes. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 239–249). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Qualitative Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412983747
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (1997). Gender, ethnicity and the inclusive curriculum: An episode in the policy framing of Australian education. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 43–53). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. D., Diem, S., Lee, P. L., Mansfield, K. C., & Welton, A. (2010, April 30–May 4). Exploring the nature and contributions of critical policy analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar