2,125
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The irony of rigor: ‘no-excuses’ charter schools at the intersections of race and disability

, &
Pages 282-298 | Received 24 Mar 2018, Accepted 11 Nov 2018, Published online: 01 Mar 2019

References

  • Angrist, J. D., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2013). Explaining charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5, 1–27. doi:10.1257/app.5.4.1
  • Ben-Moshe, L., Chapman, C., & Carey, A. (2014). Disability incarcerated: Imprisonment and disability in the United States and Canada. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34, 349–379. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00246
  • Broderick, A. A., & Leonardo, Z. (2016). What a good boy: The deployment and distribution of "goodness" as ideological property of school. In D. J. Connor, B. A. Ferri & S. Annamma (Eds.), DisCrit: Disability studies and critical race theory in education (pp. 55–67). New York Teachers College Record.
  • Buras, K. L. (2015). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. New York: Routledge.
  • Carr, S. (2014, November 17). The painful backlash against “no-excuses” school discipline. The Hecinger Report. New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from http://hechingerreport.org/painful-backlash-excuses-school-discipline/
  • Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cheng, A., Hitt, C., Kisida, B., & Mills, J. N. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 11, 209–238. doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1286210
  • Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness and the body. London: Verso.
  • Davis, L. J. (2013). The end of identity politics: On disability as an unstable category. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 263–277). New York: Routledge.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology. London: Butterworth.
  • Dickar, M. (2008). Corridor cultures: Mapping student resistance at an urban high school. New York: New York University Press.
  • Dudley-Marling, C., & Baker, D. (2012). The effects of market-based school reforms on students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32. doi:10.18061/dsq.v32i2.3187
  • Estes, M. B. (2004). Choice for all? Charter schools and students with special needs. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 257–267. doi:10.1177/00224669040370040501
  • Fabricant, M., & Fine, M. (2012). Charter schools and the corporate makeover of public education: What's at stake? New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ferguson, A. (2001). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Gillborn, D. (2015). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and the primacy of racism: Race, class, gender, and disability in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 277–287. doi:10.1177/1077800414557827
  • Goodley, D. (2014). Disability studies: Theorizing disableism and ableism. London: Routledge.
  • Goyette, K. A., Farrie, D., & Freely, J. (2012). This school's gone downhill: Racial change and perceived school quality among whites. Social Problems, 59, 155–176. doi:10.1525/sp.2012.59.2.155
  • Gulson, K. N. (2011). Education policy, space, and the city: Markets and the (in)visibility of race. New York: Routledge.
  • Hankins, K. B., & Martin, D. G. (2006). Charter schools and urban regimes in neoliberal context: Making workers and new spaces in metropolitan Atlanta. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 528–547. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00678.x
  • Hatt, B. (2012). Smartness as a cultural practice in schools. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 438–460. doi:10.3102/0002831211415661
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huff, A. (2013). Reforming the city: Neoliberal school reform and democratic contestation in New Orleans. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 57, 311–317. doi:10.1111/cag.12018
  • Lack, B. (2009). No excuses: A critique of the knowledge is power program (KIPP) within charter schools in the USA. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7, 126–153.
  • Larner, W. (2000). Theorising neoliberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5–25. doi:10.1080/19187033.2000.11675231
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Leonardo, Z., & Broderick, A. (2011). Smartness as property: A critical exploration of intersections between Whiteness and Disability Studies. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2206–2232.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.
  • Lipsitz, G. (2007). The racialization of space and the spatialization of race. Landscape Journal, 26, 10–23. doi:10.3368/lj.26.1.10
  • Losen, D. J., Keith, M. A., Hodson, C. L., & Martinez, T. E. (2016). Charter schools, civil rights and school discipline: A comprehensive review. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project-Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
  • Lubienski, C. A., & Weitzel, P. C. (2010). The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence, and implications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Marsh, L. T. S., & Noguera, P. A. (2018). Beyond stigma and stereotypes: An ethnographic study on the effects of school-imposed labeling on Black males in an urban charter school. The Urban Review, 50, 447–477. doi:10.1007/s11256-017-0441-x
  • Massaro, V. A., & Mullaney, E. G. (2011). The war on teenage terrorists: Philly's “Flash Mob Riots” and the banality of post-9/11 securitization. City, 15, 37–41. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.630856
  • Means, A. J. (2013). Schooling in the age of austerity: Urban education and the struggle for democratic life. New York: Palgrave.
  • Mitchell, D. (2015). The biopolitics of disability: Neoliberalism ablenationalism, and peripheral embodiment. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  • National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2016). Overview of public charter schools. Retrieved from http://www.publiccharters.org/dashboard/schools/year/2013
  • Olszewski, L., & Sadovi, C. (2003, December 19). Rebirth of schools set for South Side. Chicago Tribune. Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2003-12-19/news/0312190300_1_chicago-public-schools-chicago-housing-authority-new-housing-units
  • Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2012). Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the great recession. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111, 265–288. doi:10.1215/00382876-1548212
  • Pedroni, T. C. (2011). Urban shrinkage as a performance of whiteness: neoliberal urban restructuring, education, and racial containment in the post-industrial, global niche city. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 203–215. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.562666
  • Preston, C., Goldring, E., Berends, M., & Cannata, M. (2012). School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31, 318–330. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.016
  • Rauscher, L., & McClintock, J. (1996). Ableism curriculum design. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffen (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 198–231). New York: Routledge.
  • Rhim, L. M., Gumz, J., & Henderson, K. (2015). Key trends in special education in charter schools: A secondary analysis of the civil rights data collection 2011–2012. Houston, TX: National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools. Retrieved from http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52feb326e4b069fc72abb0c8/t/564109d3e4b02 7fb791d1964/1447102931798/crdc_full.pdf
  • Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Saltman, K. J. (2000). Collateral damage: Corporatizing public schools - a threat to democracy. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  • Schweik, S. M. (2009). The ugly laws: Disability in public. New York: NYU Press.
  • Shildrick, M. (2012). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Stern, M., Clonan, S., Jaffee, L., & Lee, A. (2015). The normative limits of choice: Charter schools, disability studies, and questions of inclusion. Educational Policy, 29, 448–477. doi:10.1177/0895904813510779
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012). Charter schools: Additional federal attention needed to help protect access for students with disabilities (GAO-12-543). Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office (GAO). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-543
  • Varenne, H., & McDermott, R. (1999). Successful failure: The school America builds. Boulder, CO: West- view Press.
  • Waitoller, F. R., & Super, G. (2017). School choice or the politics of desperation? Black and Latinx parents of students with dis/abilities selecting a charter school in Chicago. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(55), 1-46. doi:10.14507/epaa.25.2636
  • Walkerdine, V., & Bansel, P. (2010). Neoliberalism, work, and subjectivity: Towards a more complex account. In M. Wetherell & C. T. Mohanty (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of identities (pp. 492–507). London: Sage.
  • Waitoller, F. R., & Thorius, K. K. (2016). Cross-Pollinating Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy with Universal Design for Learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for student dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366
  • Welner, K., & Howe, K. (2005). Steering toward separation: The policy and legal implications of “counseling” special education students away from choice schools. In J. Scott (Ed.), School choice and student diversity: What the evidence says (pp. 93–111). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Winfield, A. G. (2012). Resuscitating bad science: Eugenics past and present. In W. H. Watkins (Ed.), The assault on public education: Confronting the politics of corporate school reform (pp. 143–159). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Zollers, N. J., & Ramanathan, A. K. (1998). For-profit charter schools and students with disabilities: The sordid side of the business of schooling. The Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 297–304.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.