What if reflexivity and diffraction intra-act?

References

• Adale, S. (2012). Methodology of the privileged: White anti-racist feminism, systematic ignorance, and epistemic uncertainty. Hypatia, 27(4), 701–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arac, J. (Ed.) (1986). Postmodernism and politics. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. (1970). Attention and interpretation a scientific approach to insight in psycho-analysis and groups. Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. Free Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, L. (2009). Teaching reflexivity: Undoing or reinscribing habits of gender? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(3), 327–337. doi:10.1080/03098260902742417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017). Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(2), 111–127. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2006). Reflexivity in the research process: Psychoanalytic observations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(3), 181–197. doi:10.1080/13645570600652776
   Google Scholar
• Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Nahum, J. P., Sander, L. W., Stern, D. N., & Tronick, E. Z. (2002). Explicating the implicit: The local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 83(Pt 5), 1051–1062. doi:10.1516/B105-35WV-MM0Y-NTAD
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. (2004). The promise of feminist reflexivities: Developing Donna Haraway's project for feminist science studies. Hypatia, 19(1), 162–182. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01273.x
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734–741. doi:10.1177/1077800414530256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2012). Collective biography and the entangled enlivening of being. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(4), 357–376. doi:10.1525/irqr.2012.5.4.357
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Honan, E., Laws, C., Mueller-Rockstroh, B., & Petersen, E. B. (2004). The ambivalent practices of reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(3), 360–389. doi:10.1177/1077800403257638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2005). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73–90. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2006). Foucault. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography ethnographic practices for the 21st century. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and DIfference. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using our selves in research. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, K. (2017). Personal experience and critical reflexivity in counselling and psychotherapy research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(2), 85–94. doi:10.1002/capr.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. doi:10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2003). The reflexive journey: Mapping multiple routes. Blackwell Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2017). Championing “reflexivities. Qualitative Psychology, 4(2), 120–125. doi:10.1037/qup0000075
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The use of pleasure (Vol. 2 of the The History of Sexuality). Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, K., & Wyatt, J. (2017). Working at the wonder: Collaborative writing as method of inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 355–364. doi:10.1177/1077800416659086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemignani, M. (2017). Toward a critical reflexivity in qualitative inquiry: Relational and posthumanist reflections on realism, researcher’s centrality, and representationalism in reflexivity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(2), 185–198. doi:10.1037/qup0000070
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. T. (1968). The experiential response. In E. Hammer (Ed.), Use of interpretation in treatment: Technique and Art (pp. 208–227). Jason Aronson Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–336). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest-Witness@Second-Millennium. FemaleMan-Meets-OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehner, A., Ploder, A., & Langer, P. C. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: European contributions to strong reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 699–704. doi:10.1177/1077800416658069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, S. (2017). Re-turning feelings that matter using reflexivity and diffraction to think with and through a moment of rupture in activist work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(6), 534–545. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1263885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281. doi:10.1177/1464700112456001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2013). Images of thinking in feminist materialisms: Ontological divergences and the production of researcher subjectivities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 706–716. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788759
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., & Aron, L. (2013). Relational psychoanalysis, volume 14: The emergence of a tradition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murris, K., & Bozalek, V. (2019). Diffraction and response-able reading of texts: The relational ontologies of Barad and Deleuze. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 872–886. doi:10.1080/09518398.2019.1609122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1986). The matrix of the mind: Object relations and the psychoanalytic dialogue. Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1988). On the dialectical structure of experience: Some clinical and theoretical implications. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 24(1), 17–45. doi:10.1080/00107530.1988.10746217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1997). Reverie and interpretation: Sensing something human. Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2015). Reflexivity as interpretation and genealogy in research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 15(6), 419–434. doi:10.1177/1532708615615605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. doi:10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Paranoid reading and reparative reading, or, you’re so paranoid, you probably think this essay is about you. In A. Frank (Ed.), Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serra Undurraga, J. K. A. (2020). Reflexivities as affective ways of relating that produce. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 920–930. doi:10.1177/1077800419885408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. A. (2016). Reflexivity and the “Acting Subject”: Conceptualizing the unit of analysis in qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1735–1744. doi:10.1177/1049732316657813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (2000). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women's Studies International Forum, 11(5), 493–502. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, J. (2019). Therapy, stand-up, and the gesture of writing: Towards creative-relational inquiry. Routledge.
   Google Scholar