When the map shakes up the territory. Researching teachers’ learning through a non-representational cartographic approach

References

• Akerman, J. R. (Ed.), (2009). The imperial map. Cartography and the mastery of empire. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akerman, J. R. (Ed.), (2017). Decolonizing the map. Cartography from colony to nation. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. doi:10.1177/0263276418771486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. E. (Ed.) (1999). Mappings. Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Darder, A. (2009). Decolonizing the flesh: The body, pedagogy, and inequality. Counterpoints, 369, 217–232.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2000). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2004). The logic of sense (C. Boundas, Ed.; M. Lester, Trans.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2007). Eight years later: 1980 interview. In Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975–1995 (pp. 175–180). Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J. D., Harrison, P., Rose, M., & Wylie, J. (2002). Enacting geographies. Geoforum, 33(4), 437–440. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(02)000295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doel, M. (2010). Representation and difference. In Paul Harrison & Ben Anderson (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 117–130). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. (2012). Schizoanalytic cartographies. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, L. (2016). Playgrounds as sites of radical encounters: Mapping material, affective, spatial, and pedagogical collision. Counterpoints, 501, 13–28. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/45157526
   Google Scholar
• Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity. An introduction to non-aristotelian systems and general semantics. The International Non-aristotelian Library Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2016). The refrain of the a-Grammatical child: Finding another language in/for qualitative research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 173–182. doi:10.1177/1532708616639333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. D., & Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: Qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668–679. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788756
   Google Scholar
• Masny, D. (2013). Cartographies of becoming in education. Theory and practice. In D. Masny (Ed.), Cartographies of becoming in education: A Deleuze-Guattari perspective (pp. 3–16).Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2005). For space. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, I. (2011). Expanding cartographic practices in the social sciences. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 452–473).Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P. (2008). Cartographic strategies of postmodernity: The figure of the map in contemporary theory and fiction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nail, T. (2017). What is an assemblage? SubStance, 46(1), 21–37. doi:10.3368/ss.46.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. J., & Larson, J. B. (2015). Don’t forget about the body: Exploring the curricular possibilities of embodied pedagogy. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 331–344. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9319-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J., & Brown, L. (2014). Mapping learner progression into digital creativity: Catalysts & disconnects. State of the Art Review. Retrieved January 1, 2021, from https://socialtechtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Mapping-learner-progression-into-digital-creativity-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (2017). Representing learning lives: What does it mean to map learning journeys? International Journal of Educational Research, 84, 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. B. (1999). Pedagogy and the politics of a body. A critical praxis. Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. B., & Shapiro, S. (2002). Body movements. Pedagogy, politics and social change. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. B., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Writing visually through (methodological) events and cartography. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(2), 138–152. doi:10.1177/1077800414542706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar