References
- Albanese, P. (2020). Children in Canada today (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
- Barnhart, B. (2021, March 9). Social media demographics to inform your brand’s strategy in 2021. Sprout Social. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/new-social-media-demographics/
- Biddle, S., Riberiro, P.V., & Dias, T. (2020, March 16). Invisible censorship: TikTok told moderators to suppress posts by ‘ugly’ people and the poor to attract new users. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2020/03/16/tiktok-app-moderators-users-discrimination/
- Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486
- Broderick, R. (2020, June 26). TikTok has a predator problem. A network of young women is fighting back. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/tiktok-has-a-predator-problem-young-women-are-fighting-back
- Brown, M. (2020, February 20). Is TikTok safe for kids? Parents. https://www.parents.com/kids/safety/internet/is-tiktok-safe-for-kids/
- Burman, E. (2017). Deconstructing developmental psychology. Taylor & Francis.
- Campbell, D. (2019, January 4). Depression in girls linked to higher use of social media. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jan/04/depression-in-girls-linked-to-higher-use-of-social-media
- Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction: Deleuze and research methodologies. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh University Press.
- Common Sense Media. (2021, March 5). Parents’ ultimate guide to TikTok. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/blog/parents-ultimate-guide-to-tiktok
- Davies, B. (2018). Ethics and the new materialism: A brief genealogy of the ‘post’ philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(1), 113–127.
- Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
- Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. City Lights Books.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? Columbia University Press.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (Brian Massumi, Trans.). Minnesota Press.
- Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. Columbia University Press.
- Descartes, R. (1993). Discourse on method and Meditations on first philosophy (4th ed., D. A. Cress, Trans.). Hackett Publishing. (Original work published 1641)
- Doyle, B. (2021, February 6). TikTok statistics – Updated February 2021. Wallaroo. https://wallaroomedia.com/blog/social-media/tiktok-statistics/
- Elassar, A. (2020, May 19). TikTokers stand in solidarity with black creators to protest censorship. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/19/us/tiktok-black-lives-matter-trnd/index.html
- Gerrard, J., Rudolph, S., & Sriprakash, A. (2017). The politics of post-qualitative inquiry: History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416672694
- Grosse, J. (2021, October 13). The messy truth about teen girls and Instagram: You can’t blame social media for everything. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/13/parenting/instagram-teen-girls-body-image.html
- Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
- Hern, K. (2 019, July 5). ‘Adults don’t get it’: Why TikTok is facing greater scrutiny. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/05/why-tiktok-is-facing-greater-scrutiny-video-sharing-app-child-safety
- Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
- Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
- Kelly, Y., Zilanawala, A., Booker, C., & Sacker, A. (2019, January 4). Social media use and adolescent mental health: Findings from the UK millennium cohort study. The Lancet. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(18)30060-9/fulltext#%20
- Kennedy, M. (2020). If the rise of the TikTok dance and e-girl aesthetic has taught us anything, it’s that teenage girls rule the internet right now: TikTok celebrity, girls and the Coronavirus crisis. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420945341
- Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
- Lenz Taguchi, H. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112456001
- Lorenz, T. (2020, May 21). Hype house and the Los Angeles Tik Tok mansion gold rush. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/03/style/hype-house-los-angeles-tik-tok.html
- MacLure, M. (2013a). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
- MacLure, M. (2013b). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487863
- Marinos, V., Tardif-Williams, C., Zinga, D., Raby, R., Pomerantz, S. (Eds.). (2022). Exploring agency in children and youth: Expressions and constraints. Athabasca University Press.
- May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
- Nxumalo, F., Cook, C., Rubin, J. C., Hendrix Soto, A., Cedillo, S., & Scott, M. (2020). Staying with the trouble: Grapplings with the more-than-human in a qualitative inquiry course. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419868505
- Pomerantz, S. (2020, May 8). TikTok mama: How I bonded with my tween in isolation. Globe and Mail, A13.
- Pomerantz, S. (2021). Immanent cinematic girlhoods: The ordinary affects in/of eighth grade. Feminist Media Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1922484
- Pomerantz, S., & Field, M. (2021). A TikTok assemblage: Girlhood, radical media engagement, and parent-child generativity. In F. Blaikie (Ed.), Visual and cultural identity constructs of global youth: situated, embodied and performed ways of being, engaging and belonging (pp. 139–157). Routledge.
- Pomerantz, S., & Field, M. (2022). Watching TikTok, feeling feminism: Intergenerational flows of feminist knowledge. In T. Boffone (Ed.), TikTok cultures in the United States (pp. 61–71). Routledge.
- Roberts, N. F. (2019, July 30). Neuroscience explains why Instagram is so bad for teen girls. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicolefisher/2019/06/30/neuroscience-explains-why-instagram-is-so-bad-for-teen-girls/?sh=5fc2a5ff6eba
- Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3–4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135
- Royal Society for Public Health. (2017, May). #StatusofMind: Social media and young people’s mental health and wellbeing. Royal Society for Public Health. https://www.rsph.org.uk/our-work/campaigns/status-of-mind.html
- Schaffer, J. (2010). Monism: The priority of the whole. The Philosophical Review, 119(1), 31–76. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2009-025
- Spinoza, B. (2000). Ethics (G.R. R. Parkinson, Trans. and Ed.). Oxford. (Original work published 1677)
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2021a). The lure of the new and the hold of the dogmatic. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 480–490.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2021b). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418772634
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2018). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417734567
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry”. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 1–18.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2013a). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487862
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2013b). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–626). SAGE Publications.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156422
- St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414532435
- St. Pierre, E., & Pillow, W. (Eds.). (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. Routledge.
- Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Duke University Press.
- Taylor, C. A., Gannon, S., Adams, G., Donaghue, H., Hannam-Swain, S., Harris-Evans, J., Healey, J., & Moore, P. (2020). Grim tales: Meetings, matterings and moments of silencing and frustration in everyday academic life. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101513–101519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101513
- Tuck, E. (2010). Breaking up with deleuze: Desire and valuing the irreconcilable. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500633
- Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530265
- Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books Ltd.