Flow and the pedagogical affordances of computer games: a case study

References

• Airasian, P. W., & Walsh, M. E. (1997). Constructivist cautions. Phi Delta Kappan, February, 8, 444–449.
   Google Scholar
• Anyaegbu, R. (2010). Teachers’ thoughts on the integration of computer games in the ESL classroom in Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 4th European conference on games based learning (pp. 421–428). Copenhagen: Academic Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-P., Lien, C.-J., Annetta, L., & Lu, Y.-L. (2010). The influence of an educational computer game on children’s cultural identities. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 94–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, T.-Y., & Chen, W.-F. (2009). Effect of computer-based video games on children: An experimental study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2006). Overview of research on the educational use of video games. Digital Kompetanse, 3, 184–213.
   Google Scholar
• Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2007). Third generation educational use of computer games. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 263–281.
   Google Scholar
• Florou, D., Mavroudi, H., Haidi, I., Gouscos, D., & Meimaris, M. (2009). Animating DGBL in pre-school, primary and special education: Three case studies. In Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on games based learning (pp. 124–134). Graz: Academic Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Gareau, S., & Guo, R. (2009). “All Work and No Play” reconsidered: The use of games to promote motivation and engagement in instruction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 23–38.10.1080/15391523.2007.10782494
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, D. M., & Tudge, J. R. H. (1999). Implications of Vygotsky’s theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 39–65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Inal, Y., & Cagiltay, K. (2007). Flow experiences of children in an interactive social game environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 455–464.10.1111/bjet.2007.38.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker, V., Wijers, Μ., & Van Galen, F. (2009). The motivational power of mini-games for the learning of mathematics. In Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on games based learning (pp. 202–210). Graz: Academic Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kadakia, M. (2005). Increasing student engagement by using morrowind to analyze choices and consequences. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 49, 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: Cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56, 539–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 256–270.10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, K. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 394–404.10.1111/bjet.2007.38.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutromanos, G., & Avraamidou, L. (2014). The use of mobile games in formal and informal learning environments: A review of the literature. Educational Media International, 51, 49–65.10.1080/09523987.2014.889409
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375.10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Reitano, P. (2006, December). The value of video stimulated recall in reflective teaching practices. Paper presented at the Australian Consortium for Social and Political Research Inc. (ACSPRI) Social Science Methodology Conference, New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (1993). Real-world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner – researchers. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz, C. (2006). Computerspiele als pädagogische herausforderung. In W. Kaminski & M. Lorber (Eds.), Computerspiele und soziale wirklichkeit (pp. 211–223). Bobingen: Kessler-Druck.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230601994
   Google Scholar
• Siang Ang, C., Avni, E., & Zaphiris, P. (2008). Linking pedagogical theory of computer games to their usability. International Journal on E-Learning, 7, 533–558.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2011). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: The. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, G. K., & Mallick, K. (1999). Researching education. Perspectives and techniques. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, G., & Mallick, K. (2004). Researching education: Perspectives and techniques. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., & Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games with education: Evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 8, 54–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C. (2001). Interpretivism and symbolic interactionism: “Making the Familiar Strange and Interesting Again” in educational technology research. In W. Heinecke & J. Willis (Eds.), Research methods in educational technology (pp. 81–99). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C. (2015). The rhetoric of reform and teachers’ use of ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 370–380.10.1111/bjet.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrasidas, C., & Solomou, M. (2013). Using educational design research methods to examine the affordances of online games for teacher learning. Educational Media International, 50(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar