Re-turning feminist methodologies: from a social to an ecological epistemology

References

• Araujo, A. 2007. “Introduction: A Pattern Constellation.” Haecceity 3 (1): 9–22. Accessed February 2, 2013. http://sydney.edu.au/sup/journals/haecceity/pdfs/3/intro_3_1/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (30): 801–829. doi: 10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Half-Way: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, V. 2012. “Declining Performativity: Butler, Whitehead and Ecologies of Concern.” Theory, Culture and Society 29 (2): 107–123. doi: 10.1177/0263276412438413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. 2004. “The Promise of Feminist Reflexivities: Developing Donna Haraway's Project for Feminist Science Studies.” Hypatia 19 (1): 162–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01273.x
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P., and J. Halley, eds. 2007. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Code, L. 2006. Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. 2011. The Becoming of Bodies: Girls, Images, Experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139. Accessed November 10, 2012. http://faculty.law.miami.edu/zfenton/documents/Crenshaw–DemarginalizingIntersection.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299. doi: 10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. 1982. The Civilizing Process: State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M. 2010. “Facts, Ethics and Event.” In Deleuzian Intersections: Science, Technology and Anthropology, edited by C. B. Jensen and K. Roedie, 52–82. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M., S. Kember, and C. Lury, eds. 2006. Inventive Life: Approaches to the New Vitalism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 2008. Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of Earth. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 2011. Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics and Art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1990. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler, 295–337. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan© _Meets_OncoMouset: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2000. Birth of the Kennel. A Lecture by Donna Haraway. August. Accessed February 1, 2013. http://www.egs.edu/faculty/donna-haraway/articles/birth-of-the-kennel/
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: ‘What is Strong Objectivity?’” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, 49–82. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harstock, N. 1983. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In Feminism and Methodology, edited by S. Harding, 157–180. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hekman, S. 1997. “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 22 (2): 341–365. doi: 10.1086/495159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, Patricia. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” Social Problems 33 (6): S14–S32. doi: 10.2307/800672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., ed. 2013. Researching Gender. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, J. 2012. “Pattern, Patterning.” In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by C. Lury and N. Wakeford, 125–135. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, K. 2012. Networked Reenactments: Stories Transdisciplinary Stories Tell. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., and N. Wakeford, eds. 2012. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. 2013. Always More than One: Individuation's Dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. 2010. “Post-Millennial Feminist Theory: Encounters with Humanism, Materialism, Critique, Nature, Biology and Darwin.” Journal for Cultural Research 14 (4): 427–437. doi: 10.1080/14797581003765382
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A.-M. 2003. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. 2008. “Re-Thinking Intersectionality.” Feminist Review 89: 1–15. doi: 10.1057/fr.2008.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbert, A. 2011. “Nature, Media and Knowledge: A Transdiciplinary Study of the Nature and Impact of Ecological Research in Science, Culture and Philosophy.” Unpublished MA, San Francisco: California Institute of Integral Studies. Accessed January 7, 2013. file:///Users/warwick/Desktop/Robbert,%20Adam%202011%20Nature,%20media,%20and%20knowledge:%20A%20transdisciplinary%20study%20of%20the%20nature%20and%20impact%20of%20ecological%20resea.webarchive
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1997. “Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics.” Human Geography 21 (3): 305–320. doi: 10.1191/030913297673302122
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, M. 2012. “Capturing the Social Sciences: An Experiment in Political Epistemology.” Paper presented at the London conference in critical thought. Accessed January 13, 2013. http://criticallegalthinking.com/2012/08/01/capturing-the-social-sciences-an-experiment-in-political-epistemology/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 1997. “From the Margins: Women's Standpoint as a Method of Inquiry in the Social Sciences.” Gender, Technology and Development 1 (1): 113–134. doi: 10.1177/097185249700100106
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., and S. Wise. 1993. Breaking Out Again, Feminst Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S., and J. Grieseman. 1987. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2000. “God's Heart and the Stuff of Life.” Pli 9: 86–118. Accessed January 17, 2013. http://web.warwick.ac.uk/philosophy/pli_journal/pdfs/stengers_pli_9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2010. Cosmopolitics 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, P. 2012. “Pattern.” In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by C. Lury and N. Wakeford, 136–146. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 1991. Partial Connections. London: Rowan and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1987/2007. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2012. “Configuration.” In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by C. Lury and N. Wakeford, 48–60. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Timeto, F. 2011. “Diffracting the Rays of Technoscience: A Situated Critique of Representation.” Poiesis Prax 8 (2–3): 151–167. doi: 10.1007/s10202-011-0099-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehead, A. 1978. Process and Reality. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. 2006. “Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography in and for a More-Than-Human World.” Cultural Geography 13 (4): 600–609. doi: 10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar