Teacher gender, and expectation of reading achievement in New Zealand elementary school students: essentially a barrier?

References

• Aguinis, H., R. K. Gottfredson, and S. A. Culpepper. 2013. “Best-practice Recommendations for Estimating Cross-level Interaction Effects using Multilevel Modeling.” Journal of Management 39: 1490–1528. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ailwood, J. 2003. “A National Approach to Gender Equity Policy in Australia: Another Ending, Another Opening?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 7: 19–32. doi:10.1080/13603110210143635.
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, N., and P. Gilbert. 1997. “Boys and Literacy: Lessons from Australia.” Gender and Education 9: 49–60. doi:10.1080/09540259721448.
   Google Scholar
• Ammermüller, A., and P. Dolton. 2006. “Pupil-teacher Gender Interaction Effects on Scholastic Outcomes in England and the USA.” ZEW Discussion Paper No. 06–060, Centre for European Economic Research. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/24515.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, M., and J. Lee. 2003. Women Teaching Boys: Caring and Working in the Primary School. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Auwarter, A. E., and M. S. Arguete. 2008. “Effects of Student Gender and Socioeconomic Status on Teacher Perceptions.” The Journal of Educational Research 101: 242–246. doi:10.3200/JOER.101.4.243-246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., D. Y. H. Tom, and H. M. Cooper. 1985. “Social Class, Race and Teacher Expectations.” In Teacher Expectancies, edited by J. B. Dusek, 251–269. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bosson, J. K., J. N. Taylor, and J. L. Prewitt-Freilino. 2006. “Gender Role Violations and Identity Misclassification: The Roles of Audience and Actor Variables.” Sex Roles 55: 13–24. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9056-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradstreet, A. 2000. “Gender Equity in The New Zealand Curriculum: A Change in Focus.” ACE Papers 7: 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E. 1985. “Teacher-student Interaction.” In Teacher Expectancies, edited by J. B. Dusek, 303–328. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burusic, J., T. Babarovic, and M. Seric. 2012. “Differences in Elementary School Achievement between Girls and Boys: Does the Teacher Gender Play a Role?” European Journal of Psychology of Education 27: 523–538. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0093-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, B., and A. McPhee. 2008. “Boys’ Underachievement and the Feminization of Teaching.” Journal of Education for Teaching 34: 109–120. doi:10.1080/02607470801979558.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, B., P. Tymms, and C. Merrell. 2008. “Role Models, School Improvement, and the ‘Gender Gap’: Do Men Bring out the Best in Boys and Women the Best in Girls?” British Educational Research Journal 34: 315–327. doi:18.1080/01411920701532202 doi: 10.1080/01411920701532202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheryan, C., and V. C. Plaut. 2010. “Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest.” Sex Roles 63: 475–488. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, I. 2012. “The Effect of Teacher-student Gender Matching: Evidence from OECD Countries.” Economics of Education Review 31: 54–67. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudgar, A. R., and V. Sankar. 2008. “The Relationship between Teacher Gender and Student Achievement: Evidence from Five Indian States.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 38: 627–642. doi:10.1080/03057920802351465.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, P. 2008. “So What Exactly Do You Want? What Principals Mean When They Say ‘Male Role Model’.” Gender and Education 20: 123–136. doi:10.1080/09540250701805847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, P. 2010. “Male Primary School Teachers: Helping or Hindering a Move to Gender Equity?” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 1211–1218. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. 2007. “Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Human Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 42: 525–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, G. 2007. “The Feminization of Primary Education: Effects of Teachers’ Sex on Pupil Achievement, Attitudes and Behaviour.” International Review of Education 53: 183–203. doi:10.1007/s11159-007-9039-y.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., K. Warren, and M. Walsh. 2001. “Classroom Interactions: Gender of Teacher, Gender of Student, and Classroom Subject.” Sex Roles 45: 579–593. doi:10.1023/A:1014892408105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusek, J. B., and B. Joseph. 1985. “The Basis of Teacher Expectancies.” In Teacher Expectancies, edited by J. B. Dusek, 229–250. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• e-asTTle Project Team. 2009. e-asTTle Generation 2: e-asTTle Educator Manual. . Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G., D. D. Goldhaber, and D. J. Brewer. 1995. “Do Teachers’ Race, Gender, and Ethnicity Matter? Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48: 547–561. doi:10.3386/w4669 doi: 10.1177/001979399504800312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., and S. Reise. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D. R., K. L. Alexander, and L. S. Olsen. 2007. “Early Schooling: The Handicap of Being Poor and Male.” Sociology of Education 80: 114–138. doi:10.1177/003804070708000202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, G. 2004. You’ll be a Man If You Play Rugby: Sport and the Construction of Gender. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press in association with the Christchurch College of Education and Whitireia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, R. 1985. It’s Different for Daughters: A History of the Curriculum for Girls in NZ Schools 1900–1975. Wellington: NZ Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, R., and J. Chapman. 2006. “Teacher Numbers in New Zealand: Attrition and Replacement.” New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work 3: 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, B. L., and R. M. Sutton. 2013. “A Stereotype Threat Account of Boys’ Academic Underachievement.” Child Development 84: 1716–1733. doi:10.1111/cdev.12079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthsesis of Over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helbig, M. 2012. “Boys do not Benefit from Male Teachers in their Reading and Mathematics Skills: Empirical Evidence from 21 European Union and OECD Countries.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 33: 661–677. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2012.674782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund, H., and K. Sund. 2008. “Is the Gender Gap in School Performance Affected by the Sex of the Teacher?” Labour Economics 15: 37–53. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, D., and C. Hatzichristou. 1999. “Teacher Gender-related Influences in Greek Schools.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 69: 1–18. doi:10.1348/000709999157527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. 1996. “Meta-analysis and the Psychology of Gender Differences.” In Gender and Scientific Authority, edited by B. Laslett, S. G. Kohlstedt, H. Longino, and E. Hammonds, 302–320. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. 2013. SPSS for Windows v.22. New York, NY: IBM.
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., J. S. Eccles, and S. Madon. 1996. “Social Perception, Social Stereotypes, and Teacher Expectations: Accuracy and the Quest for the Powerful Self-fulfilling Prophecy.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by M. P. Zanna, Vol. 28, 281–388. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., and L. Fitzclarence. 1997. “Masculinity, Violence and Schooling: Challenging ‘Poisonous Pedagogies’.” Gender and Education 9: 117–134. doi:10.1080/09540259721493.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. 2004. “Who is Most Responsible for Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievements: Pupils or Teachers?” Educational Research 46: 183–193. doi:10.1080/0013188042000222458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg, J. M. 2005. “Student Gender and Teacher Gender: What is the Impact on High Stakes Test Scores?” Current Issues in Education 8 (9). http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number9.
   Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, M. R., and R. S. Weinstein. 2000. “Classroom and Grade Level Differences in the Stability of Teacher Expectations and Perceived Differential Treatment.” Learning Environments Research 3: 1–34. doi:10.1023/A:1009904718353.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, Y. H., S. K. Tse, J. W. I. Lam, and E. K. Y. Loh. 2010. “Does the Gender of the Teacher Matter in the Teaching of Reading Literacy? Teacher Gender and Pupil Attainment in Reading Literacy in Hong Kong.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 754–759. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. 1999. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Review.” Educational Research 41: 63–76. doi:10.1080/0013188990410106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., W. Martino, M. Mills, and M. Bahr. 2002. “Addressing the Educational Needs of Boys.” Research Report: Department of Education, Science, and Training, November, 2002. http://works.bepress.com/mark_bahr/1.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, S., and T. Pekkarinen. 2008. “ASSESSMENT: Global Sex Differences in Test Score Variability.” Science 322: 1331–1332. doi:10.1126/science.1162573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino, W. 2008. “Male Teachers as Role Models: Addressing Issues of Masculinity, Pedagogy, and the Re-masculinization of Schooling.” Curriculum Inquiry 38: 189–223. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00405.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino, W., and M. Pallotta-Chiarolli. 2003. So What’s a Boy? Addressing Issues of Masculinity and Schooling. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinot, D., C. Bagès, and M. Desért. 2012. “French Children’s Awareness of Gender Stereotypes about Mathematics and Reading: When Girls Improve their Reputation in Math.” Sex Roles 66: 210–219. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0032-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., B. Bower Glienke, and S. Burg. 2006. “Gender and Motivation.” Journal of School Psychology 44: 351–373. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullola, S., M. Jokela, N. Ravaja, J. Lipsanen, M. Hintsanen, S. Alatupa, and L. Keltikangas-Järvinen. 2011. “Associations of Student Temperament and Educational Competence with Academic Achievement: The Role of Teacher Age and Teacher and Student Gender.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27: 942–951. doi:10.1016 /j.tate.2011.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugebauer, M., M. Helbig, and A. Landmann. 2011. “Unmasking the Myth of the Same-sex Teacher Advantage.” European Sociological Review 27: 669–689. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Educational Institute. 1999. “Who’s to Blame for Boys’ Underachievement?” Rourou 6, May.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. The ABC of Gender Equality in Education: Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264229945-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Low-performing Students: Why They Fall Behind and How to Help Them Succeed. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264250246-en.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W. 2000. “Advantages of Hierarchical Linear Modeling.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7: 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S., and R. Rosenthal. 1990. “Sex and Expectations of Teachers and Sex and Race of Students as Determinants of Teaching Behavior and Student Performance.” Journal of School Psychology 28: 119–131. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(90)90003-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulsford, M. 2014. “Constructing Men Who Teach: Research into Care and Gender as Productive of the Male Primary Teacher.” Gender and Education 26: 215–231. doi:10.1080/09540253.2014.901719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., C. Charlton, W. J. Browne, M. Healy, and B. Cameron. 2015. MLwiN Version 2.32. Centre for Multilevel Modelling. Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W. 1984. “Magnitude of Teacher Expectancy Effects on Pupil IQ as a Function of the Credibility of Expectancy Induction: A Synthesis of Findings from 18 Experiments.” Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 85–97. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retelsdorf, J., K. Schwartz, and F. Asbrock. 2015. “‘Michael Can’t Read!’ Teachers’ Gender Stereotypes and Boys’ Reading Self-concept..” Journal of Educational Psychology 107: 186–194. doi:10.1037/a0037107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., and L. Jacobson. 1968. Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Rout, B. 1997. “Being ‘Staunch’: Boys Hassling Girls.” In Women and Education in Aotearoa 2, edited by S. Middleton and A. Jones, 169–180. Auckland: Auckland University Press with Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C. M. 2010. “Teacher Expectations and Perceptions of Student Attributes: Is There a Relationship?” British Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 121–135. doi:10.1348/000709909X466334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C. M. 2015. Becoming a High Expectation Teacher: Raising the Bar. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C. M., J. Hattie, and R. Hamilton. 2006. “Expecting the Best for Students: Teacher Expectations and Academic Outcomes.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 429–444. doi: 10.1348/000709905X53589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C. M., E. R. Peterson, C. G. Sibley, and R. Rosenthal. 2015. “A Teacher Expectation Intervention: Modelling the Practices of High Expectation Teachers.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 40: 72–85. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C. M., R. S. Weinstein, F. L. Huang, A. Gregory, P. A. Cowan, and C. P. Cowan. 2014. “Successive Teacher Expectation Effects Across the Early School Years.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 35: 181–191. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scantlebury, K. 2006. “Gender.” In Teaching and Learning Science: A Handbook, edited by K. Tobin, 201–206. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skelton, C. 2003. “Male Primary Teachers and Perceptions of Masculinity.” Educational Review 55: 195–209. doi:10.1080/0013191032000072227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton, C. 2009. “Failing to get Men into Primary Teaching: A Feminist Critique.” Journal of Education Policy 24: 39–54. doi:10.1080/02680930802412677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, L., H. Katz, A. Sych-Yereniuk, L. Chocinov-Harder, M. Adkins, T. Grills, … G. Priddle. 2005. Male Reading Teachers: Effects on Inner City Boys. Winnipeg: University of Winnipeg.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. 1997. “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance..” American Psychologist 52: 613–629. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tach, L. M., and G. Farkas. 2006. “Learning-related Behaviors, Cognitive Skills, and Ability Grouping When Schooling Begins.” Social Science Research 35: 1048–1079. doi:10:10.1080/0013188042000222458 doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. 2000. “Gender-related Beliefs of Teachers in Elementary School Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 41: 191–207. doi:10.1023/A:1003953801526.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, L., E. Denessen, L. Hornstra, M. J. Voeten, and R. W. Holland. 2010. “The Implicit Prejudiced Attitudes of Teachers: Relations to Teacher Expectations and the Ethnic Achievement Gap.” American Educational Research Journal 47: 497–527. doi:10.3102/0002831209353594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, P. W., C. M. Rubie-Davies, K. Meissel, E. R. Peterson, A. Flint, L. Garrett, and L. McDonald. 2016. “Gendered Teacher Expectations of Mathematics Achievement in New Zealand: Contributing to a Kink at the Base of the STEM Pipeline?” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 8 (1): 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., and J. Sheehan. 2001. “Gender Issues in Education.” In Theory in Practice for Educators, edited by V. Carpenter, 211–232. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter, I., E. Braun, and B. Hannover. 2015. “Reading is for Girls!? The Negative Impact of Preschool Teachers’ Traditional Gender Role Attitudes on Boys’ Reading Related Motivation and Skills.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 91. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younger, M., and M. Warrington. 2008. “The Gender Agenda in Primary Teacher Education in England: Fifteen Lost Years?” Journal of Education Policy 23: 429–445. doi:10.1080/02680930802054396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar