443
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effects of input-enhanced instruction on Iranian EFL learners' production of appropriate and accurate suggestions

, &

References

  • Alcon-Soler, E. 2008. Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
  • Bacelar Da Silva, A.J. 2003. The effects of instruction on pragmatic development: teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies 22, no. 1: 55–106.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2001. Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics?. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. G. Kasper and K. Rose, 13–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Z. Dornyei. 1998. Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations?. Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 32: 233–259. doi: 10.2307/3587583
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. and B.S. Hartford. 1996. Input in an institutional setting. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 171–178. doi: 10.1017/S027226310001487X
  • Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Canale, M. and M. Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47. doi: 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
  • DeKeyser, R. 2003. Implicit and explicit learning. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and M.H. Long, 318–348. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Ellis, R. 1997. SLA Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. 2005. Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fernandez Guerra, A. and A. Martinez-Flor. 2006. Is teaching how to suggest a good suggestion? An empirical study based on EFL learners’ accuracy and appropriateness when making suggestions. Porta Linguarum 5: 91–108.
  • Fowler, W.S. and N. Coe. 1976. Nelson English Language Tests. London: Butler & Tanner.
  • Fukuya, Y. 1998. Consciousness-raising of downgraders in requests. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum, University of Hawaii, Manoa, October.
  • Fukuya, Y. and M. Clark. 2001. A comparison of input enhancement and explicit instruction of mitigators. In Pragmatics and Language Learning, ed. L. Bouton, 111–130. Monograph Series, vol. 10. Division of English as an International Language. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
  • Fukuya, Y.J. and A. Martinez-Flor. 2008. The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatic instruction. Foreign Language Annals 41, no. 3: 478–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03308.x
  • Fukuya, Y. and Y. Zhang. 2002. The effects of recasts on EFL learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies 21, no. 1: 1–47.
  • Hernandez, T. 2011. Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research 15, no. 2: 159–182. doi: 10.1177/1362168810388694
  • Hinkel, E. 1994. Appropriateness of advice as L2 solidarity strategy. RELC Journal 25: 71–93. doi: 10.1177/003368829402500205
  • Hinkel, E. 1997. Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics 18, no. 1: 1–26. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.1.1
  • House, J. 1996. Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, no. 2: 225–252. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100014893
  • House, J. and G. Kasper. 1981. The role of cognition in communication courses. Die Neueren Sprachen 80: 42–55.
  • Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics, ed. J.B. Pride and J. Holmes, 269–293. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
  • Jeon, E.H. and T. Kaya. 2006. Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: a meta-analysis. In Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching, ed. J.M. Norris and L. Ortega, 165–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kasper, G. 2001. Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. K. Rose and G. Kasper, 33–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kasper, G. and K. Rose. 2002. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kasper, G. and R. Schmidt. 1996. Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 149–169. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100014868
  • Kondo, S. 2001. Instructional effects on pragmatic development: Interlanguage refusal. Paper presented at PacSLRF at University of Hawaii at Manoa.
  • Kubota, M. 1995. Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin 9: 35–67.
  • Liddicoat, A.J. and C. Crozet. 2001. Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, eds. K.R. Rose and G. Kasper, 125–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • LoCastro, V. 2000. Evidence of accommodation to L2 pragmatic norms in peer review tasks of Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal 22, no. 2: 245–270.
  • Martinez-Flor, A. 2004. The effect of instruction on the development of pragmatic competence in the English as a foreign language context: a study based on suggestions. PhD diss., Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
  • Martinez-Flor, A. and Y. Fukuya. 2005. The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System 33: 463–480. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007
  • Matsumura, S. 2001. Learning the rules for offering advice: a quantitative approach to second language socialization. Language Learning 51, no. 4: 635–679. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00170
  • Matsumura, S. 2003. Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics 24, no. 4: 465–491. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.4.465
  • Morrow, C. 1995. The pragmatic effects of instruction on ESL learners’ production of complaint and refusal speech acts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Buffalo, State University of New York.
  • Nguyen, T.T.M., T.H. Pham and M.T. Pham. 2012. The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics 44, no. 4: 416–434. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003
  • Norris, J.M. and L. Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50: 417–528. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00136
  • Olshtain, E. and A.D. Cohen. 1990. The learning of complex speech act behavior. TESL Canada Journal 7, no. 2: 45–65.
  • Pearson, L. 1998. Spanish L2 pragmatics: the effects of metapragmatic discussion. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum ‘98, University of Hawaii, Manoa.
  • Rose, K. and G. Kasper (eds.). 2001. Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rose, K. and C. NgKwai-fun. 2001. Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. K. Rose and G. Kasper, 145–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Salazar, P. C. 2003. Pragmatic instruction in the EFL context. In Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching, ed. A. Martínez-Flor, E. Usó and A. Fernández, 233–246. Castellón, Spain: Universitat Jaume I.
  • Schmidt, R. 1993. Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka, 21–42. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 3–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Searle, J. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5, no. 1: 1–23.
  • Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, S. 1993. Input enhancement in instructed SLA: theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 165–179. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011943
  • Takahashi, S. 2001. The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. K. Rose and G. Kasper, 171–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Takimoto, M. 2009. Exploring the effects of input-based treatment and test on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1029–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.001
  • Tateyama, Y. 2001. Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines: Japanese sumimasen. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. K. Rose and G. Kasper, 200–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tateyama, Y., G. Kasper, L. Mui, H. Tay and O. Thananart. 1997. Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In Pragmatics and Language Learning, ed. L. Bouton, 163–178. Monograph Series, vol. 8. Division of English as an International Language. University of Illinois: Urbana-Champaign, IL.
  • Taylor, G. 2002. Teaching gambits: the effect of instruction and task variation on the use of conversation strategies by intermediate Spanish students. Foreign Language Annals 35, no. 2: 171–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb03153.x
  • Van Patten, B. and T. Cadierno. 1993. Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 225–243. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011979
  • Watts, R. J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wong, W. 2005. Input Enhancement: From Theory and Research to the Classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.