Getting used to content and language integrated learning: what can classroom interaction reveal?

References

• Birdsong, D. 2006. Age and second language acquisition and processing: a selective overview. Language Learning 56, no. 1: 9–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee and D. Gorter. 2014. Critical analysis of CLIL: taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics 35, no. 3: 243–62. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, V.P. 1989. How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly 23, no. 3: 509–31. doi: 10.2307/3586923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 1979. Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research 49, no. 2: 222–51. doi: 10.3102/00346543049002222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content-and-Language-Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. New York: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Di Camilla, F.J. and M. Antón. 2012. Functions of L1 in the collaborative interaction of beginning and advanced language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22, no. 2: 160–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00302.x
   Google Scholar
• Education Department. 1997. Medium of Instruction: Guidance for Secondary School. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. and X. He. 1999. The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, no. 2: 285–301. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199002077
   Google Scholar
• de Graaff, R., G.J. Koopman, Y. Anikina and G. Westhoff. 2007. An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10, no. 5: 603–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerly, H. 1987. The immersion approach: litmus test of second language acquisition through classroom communication. Modern Language Journal 71, no. 4: 395–401.
   Google Scholar
• HKEAA. 2011. HKCEE Exam Report. http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/hkcee/Exam_Report/Examination_Statistics/ (accessed 25 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ho, B. and K.K. Ho. 2004. The developmental trend of the medium of instruction in secondary schools of Hong Kong: Prospect and retrospect. Language and Education 18, no. 5: 400–13. doi: 10.1080/09500780408666891
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Education Bureau. 2006. Further Evaluation on the Implementation of the MOI Guidance for Schools, 2002 Secondary–2004. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J. and U. Smit. 2014. CLIL (content and language integrated learning): the bigger picture. A response to: A. Bruton. 2013. CLIL: some of the reasons why … and why not. System 44: 160–67. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0346251X/44 (accessed 20 April 2015). doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.K. and M. Swain. 1994. From core to content: bridging the L2 proficiency gap in late immersion. Language and Education 8, no. 4: 211–29. doi: 10.1080/09500789409541392
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. and J.M. Sierra. 2010. Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities. ELT Journal 64, no. 4: 367–75. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaruk, W. 2007. Linguistic, academic, and cognitive benefits of French immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 63, no. 5: 605–27. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.63.5.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenneberg, E. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A.M.Y. and E.Y.F. Man. 2009. Bilingual Education: Southeast Asian Perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares Garcia, A. and T. Morton. 2010. Historical explanations as situated practice in content and language integrated learning. Classroom Discourse 1, no. 1: 46–65. doi: 10.1080/19463011003750681
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.Y. 2010. What happens to classroom interaction patterns and teachers’ code-switching behaviour when the medium of instruction changes? An exploratory study in Hong Kong secondary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.Y. and E.S.C. Lo. 2014. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong. Review of Educational Research 84, no. 1: 47–73. doi: 10.3102/0034654313499615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.Y. and E. Macaro. 2012. The medium of instruction and classroom interaction: evidence from Hong Kong secondary schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15, no. 1: 29–52. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2011.588307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M.H. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics 4, no. 2: 126–41. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. and S. Ballinger. 2011. Content-based language teaching: convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language Teaching Research 15, no. 2: 279–88.
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. and T. Mutton. 2002. Developing language teachers through a co-researcher model. The Language Learning Journal 25, no. 1: 27–39. doi: 10.1080/09571730285200071
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. and R. Oliver. 2002. Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System 30, no. 4: 459–77. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00049-0
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, R. Wegerif and C. Sams. 2004. Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal 30, no. 3: 359–77. doi: 10.1080/01411920410001689689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E.F. and P.H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D. and D. Reynolds. 2001. Effective Teaching: Evidence and Practice. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, C. 2014. Complexities and interactions of age effects in L2 learning: Broadening the research agenda. Applied Linguistics 35, no. 4: 369–73. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikula, T. 2007. The IRF pattern and space for interaction: comparing CLIL and EFL classrooms. In Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse, eds. C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit, 179–204. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T. 2010. Effects of CLIL on a teacher's classroom language use. In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, eds. C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula and U. Smit, 105–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., C. Dalton-Puffer and A. Llinares Garcia. 2013. European research on CLIL classroom discourse. International Journal of Immersion and Content Based Education 1, no. 1: 70–100. doi: 10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M.L. 2012. CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15, no. 3: 315–41. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, A.Y.K. 2010. Language use, and language policy and planning in Hong Kong. Current Issues in Language Planning 11, no. 1: 1–66. doi: 10.1080/14664201003682327
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S. and N. Mercer. 2003. Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research 39, no. 1–2: 99–111. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson, eds. G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer, 125–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A.B.M. 1985. Analysing input and interaction in second language classrooms. RELC Journal 16, no. 1: 8–32. doi: 10.1177/003368828501600102
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A.B.M. 1995. Introducing Classroom Interaction. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A.B.M. 2004. Medium of instruction in Hong Kong: one country, two systems, whose language? In Medium of Instruction Policies: Which Agenda? Whose Agenda? eds. J. Tollefson and A.B.M. Tsui, 97–106. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, K.Y. 1993. Classroom interaction and teacher questions revisited. RELC Journal 24, no. 2: 49–68. doi: 10.1177/003368829302400203
   Google Scholar
• Yip, D.Y., D. Coyle and W.K. Tsang. 2007. Evaluation of the effects of medium of instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: instructional activities in science lessons. Educational Journal 35, no. 1: 77–107.
   Google Scholar