Vocabulary explanations in CLIL classrooms: a conversation analysis perspective

References

• Baecher, L., T. Farnsworth and A. Ediger. 2014. The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research 18, no. 3: 118–36. doi: 10.1177/1362168813505381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarata, L. and D.J. Tedick. 2012. Balancing content and language in instruction: the experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal 96, no. 2: 251–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudron, C. 1982. Vocabulary elaboration in teachers’ speech to L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 4, no. 2: 170–80. doi: 10.1017/S027226310000440X
   Google Scholar
• Costa, F. 2012. Focus on form in ICLHE lectures in Italy: evidence from English-medium science lectures by native speakers of Italian. AILA Review 25: 30–47. doi: 10.1075/aila.25.03cos
   Google Scholar
• Dale, L. and R. Tanner. 2012. CLIL Activities; A Resource for Subject and Language Teachers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2013. The National Curriculum in England: Framework Document. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A., M.D. Pérez Murillo and R.M. Johnstone. 2010. Bilingual Education Project Spain: Evaluation Report. Madrid: Gobierno de España Ministerio de Educación & British Council (Spain).
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. 1992. Definitions in science lectures. Applied Linguistics 13, no. 2: 202–21. doi: 10.1093/applin/13.2.202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2007. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society 18, no. 1: 53–73. doi: 10.1177/0957926507069457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2010. Displays of epistemic access: student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43, no. 2: 183–209. doi: 10.1080/08351811003737846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. and N. Girsai. 2008. Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: a case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, no. 4: 694–716. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaraton, A. 2004. Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: a microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning 54, no. 1: 79–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A. and T. Morton. 2010. Historical explanations as situated practice in content and language integrated learning. Classroom Discourse 1, no. 1: 46–65. doi: 10.1080/19463011003750681
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. 2011. Focus on form. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Volume II, ed. E. Hinkel, 576–92. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M.H. 1991. Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. K. de Bot, R.B. Ginsberg and C. Kramsch, 39–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. 1995. Teachers’ answers to students’ questions: problematizing the issue of making meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics 6, no. 2: 63–92.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What the Hands Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. 2011. Doing word explanation in interaction. In L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-analytic Perspectives, ed. G. Pallotti and J. Wagner, 135–63. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C. 2007. The need for focus on form in content and language integrated approaches: an exploratory study. In Models and Practices in CLIL. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) Volumen monográfico, ed. F. Lorenzo, S. Casal, V. de Alba and P. Moore, 39–53. Logroño: Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P.J. 2005. Teaching key vocabulary in geography and science classrooms: an analysis of teachers’ practice with particular reference to EAL pupils’ learning. Language and Education 19, no. 5: 428–45. doi: 10.1080/09500780508668695
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2011. Which language competencies benefit from CLIL? An insight into applied linguistics research. In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning: Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, ed. Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 129–54. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E.A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M. 2011. Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research 15, no. 3: 325–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L. and E. Macaro. 2012. Comparing the effect of teacher codeswitching with English-only explanations on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university students: a lexical focus-on-form study. Language Teaching Research 16, no. 3: 367–91. doi: 10.1177/1362168812436909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2012. Conceptualising classroom interactional competence. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 6, no. 1: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H.Z., C.C. Creider and C.D. Box. 2013. Explaining vocabulary in the second language classroom: a conversation analytic account. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction 2, no. 4: 249–64. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, V. and M. Wagner. 1984. Teacher Talk: The Structure of Vocabulary and Grammar Explanations. Department of ESL scholarly paper. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
   Google Scholar