782
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of explicit instruction and task repetition on Colombian EFL students’ use of politeness strategies during disagreements

&

References

  • Ahmadian, M.J. and Tavakoli, M. 2011. The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research 15, no. 1: 35–59. doi: 10.1177/1362168810383329
  • Alcón-Soler, E. 2005. Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System 33, no. 3: 417–35. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., S. Mossman and H.E. Vellenga. 2015. The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research 19, no. 3: 324–50. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541739
  • Beebe, L.M. and T. Takahashi. 1989. Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts: Chastisement and disagreement. In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical Studies in Second Language Variation, ed. M.R. Eisenstein, 199–218. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Beebe, L., T. Takahashi and R. Uliss-Weltz. 1990. Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language, ed. R.C. Scarcella, E. Andersen and S.D. Krashen, 55–94. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
  • Blum-Kulka, S. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of pragmatics 11, no. 2: 131–46. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5
  • Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bygate, M. 1999. Task as the context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System 27, no. 1: 33–48. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-7
  • Bygate, M. 2001. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In Task-Based Learning: Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, ed. M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain, 23–48. London: Longman.
  • Cohen, A.D. 2005. Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics 2, no. 3: 275–301. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.275
  • Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2010. Data collection methods in speech act performance. In Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. A. Martinez-Flor and E. Usó-Juan, 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Fukuta, J. 2015. Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research. doi: 1362168815570142.
  • García, C. 1989. Disagreeing and requesting by Americans and Venezuelans. Linguistics and Education 1, no. 3: 299–322. doi: 10.1016/S0898-5898(89)80004-X
  • Gass, S., A. Mackey and L. Feldman. 2005. Task-based interactions in classrooms and laboratory settings. Language Learning 55, no. 4: 575–611. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x
  • Gass, S., A. Mackey, M. Fernandez and M. Alvarez-Torres. 1999. The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning 49, no. 4: 549–80. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00102
  • Gilabert, R. and J. Barón 2013. The impact of increasing task complexity on L2 pragmatic moves. In Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Settings, ed. A. Mackey and K. McDonough, 45–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Gu, X. 2011. The effect of explicit and implicit instructions of request strategies. Intercultural Communication Studies 20, no. 1: 104–23.
  • Halenko, N. and C. Jones. 2011. Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: is explicit instruction effective? System 39, no. 2: 240–50. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.05.003
  • Holtgraves, T. 1997. Yes, but … positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16, no. 2: 222–39. doi: 10.1177/0261927X970162006
  • Kim, Y. 2013. Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts, ed. K. McDonough and A. Mackey, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kim, Y. and N. Tracy-Ventura. 2013. The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: what needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System 41, no. 3: 829–40. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
  • Koike, D.A. and L. Pearson. 2005. The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System 33, no. 3: 481–501. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.008
  • Kreutel, K. 2007. ‘I’m not agree with you.’ ESL learners’ expressions of disagreement. TESL-EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 11, no. 3: 1–35.
  • Locher, M.A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication (Vol. 12). Berlin: M. de Gruyter.
  • Malamed, L. 2010. Disagreement: how to disagree agreeably. In Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. A. Martinez-Flor and E. Usó-Juan, 199–215. John Benjamins.
  • Martinez-Flor, A. and Y.J. Fukuya. 2005. The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System 33, no. 3: 463–80. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007
  • McCarthy, M., J. McCarten, and H. Sandiford. 2009. Touchstone 4. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McDonough, K. and J. De Vleeschauwer. 2012. Prompt type frequency, auditory pattern discrimination, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, no. 3: 355–77. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000113
  • McDonough, K. and Y. Kim. 2009. Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Modern Language Journal 93, no. 3: 386–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00897.x
  • Murray, N. 2010. Pragmatics, awareness raising, and the cooperative principle. ELT Journal 64, no. 3: 293–301. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp056
  • Olshtain, E. and A. Cohen. 1983. Apology: a speech act set. In Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, ed. N. Wolfson and E. Judd, 18–35. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Patanasorn, C. 2010. Effects of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
  • Plough, I. and S. Gass. 1993. Interlocutor and task familiarity: effects on interactional structure. In Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice, ed. Graham Crookes and Susan Gass, 35–55. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred and dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action, ed. J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rees-Miller, J. 2000. Power, severity and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 32, no. 8: 1087–111. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00088-0
  • Rose, K.R. 2005. On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System 33, no. 3: 385–99. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003
  • Scott, S. 2002. Linguistic feature variation within disagreements: an empirical investigation. Text and Talk 22, no. 2: 301–28.
  • Sifianou, M. 2012. Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 44, no. 12: 1554–64. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009
  • Sornig, K. 1977. Disagreement and contradiction as communicative acts. Journal of Pragmatics 1, no. 4: 347–73. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(77)90028-5
  • Takimoto, M. 2012. Assessing the effects of identical task repetition and task-type repetition on learners’ recognition and production of second language request downgraders. Intercultural Pragmatics 9, no. 1: 1–136. doi: 10.1515/ip-2012-0004
  • Tannen, D. and C. Kakava. 1992. Power and solidarity in modern Greek conversation: disagreeing to agree. Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 10, no. 1: 11–34. doi: 10.1353/mgs.2010.0203
  • Trofimovich, P. and E. Gatbonton. 2006. Repetition and focus on form in L2 Spanish word processing: implications for pronunciation instruction. The Modern Language Journal 90, no. 4: 519–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00464.x
  • Walkinshaw, I. 2007. Power and disagreement insights into Japanese learners of English. RELC Journal 38, no. 3: 278–301. doi: 10.1177/0033688207085848

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.