Oral corrective feedback: teachers’ concerns and researchers’ orientation

References

• Ammar, A. and N. Spada. 2006. One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 4: 543–74. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L. and F.M. Forzani. 2009. The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 60, no. 5: 497–511. doi: 10.1177/0022487109348479
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2003. Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching 36, no. 2: 81–109. doi: 10.1017/S0261444803001903
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2010. Another reply to Truscott on error correction: improved situated designs over statistics. System 38, no. 3: 491–8. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. and S. Etherington. 2002. Focus on grammatical form: explicit or implicit? System 30, no. 4: 433–58. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00048-9
   Google Scholar
• Busch, D. 2010. Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: the second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research 14, no. 3: 318–37. doi: 10.1177/1362168810365239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., S. Loewen and R. Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 2: 339–68. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. and Y. Sheen. 2006. Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 4: 575–600. doi: 10.1017/S027226310606027X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goo, J. and A. Mackey. 2013. The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, no. 1: 127–65. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Z.H. and J.H. Kim. 2008. Corrective recasts: what teachers might want to know. The Language Learning Journal 36, no. 1: 35–44. doi: 10.1080/09571730801988371
   Google Scholar
• Jean, G. and D. Simard. 2011. Grammar learning in English and French L2: students’ and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions. Foreign Language Annals 44, no. 4: 465–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kainvanpanah, S., S.M. Alavi and S. Sepehrinia. 2015. Preferences for interactional feedback: differences between learners and teachers. The Language Learning Journal 43, no. 1: 1–20. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2014.997459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartchava, E. and A. Ammar. 2014. The noticeability and effectiveness of corrective feedback in relation to target type. Language Teaching Research 18, no. 4: 428–52. doi: 10.1177/1362168813519373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2009. Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal 63, no. 1: 13–22. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccn010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E.J. 2013. Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System 41, no. 2: 217–30. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. 2014. The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target. Language Teaching Research 18, no. 3: 373–96. doi: 10.1177/1362168813510384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. and J. Hedgcok. 1996. Negative feedback incorporation among high-proficiency and low-proficiency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning 46, no. 4: 567–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinaresa, A. and R. Lyster. 2014. The influence of context on patterns of corrective feedback and learner uptake: a comparison of CLIL and immersion classrooms. The Language Learning Journal 42, no. 2: 181–94. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2014.889509
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. and J. Philp. 2006. Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal 90, no. 4: 536–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M.H. 2007. Recasts: the story so far. In Problems in SLA, ed. M.H. Long, 75–116. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 1998. Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning 48, no. 2: 183–218. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, no. 3: 399–432. doi: 10.1017/S0272263104263021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. and J. Izquierdo. 2009. Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 59, no. 2: 453–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., P.M. Lightbown and N. Spada. 1999. A response to Truscott’s ‘What’s wrong with oral grammar correction’. Canadian Modern Language Review 55, no. 4: 546–67. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.55.4.457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. and H. Mori. 2006. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 2: 269–300. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. and L. Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language acquisition 26, no. 3: 399–432.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. and L. Ranta. 2013. Counterpoint piece: the case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, no. 1: 167–84. doi: 10.1017/S027226311200071X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., K. Saito and M. Sato. 2013. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46, no. 1: 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. and J. Goo. 2007. Interaction research in SLA: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies, ed. A. Mackey, 407–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. and R. Oliver. 2002. Interactional feedback and children’s L2 development. System 30, no. 4: 459–77. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00049-0
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. and J. Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82, no. 3: 338–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., C. Polio and K. McDonough. 2004. The relationship between experience, education and teachers’ use of incidental focus-on-form techniques. Language Teaching Research 8, no. 3: 301–27. doi: 10.1191/362168804lr147oa
   Google Scholar
• Mak, B. 2011. An exploration of speaking-in-class anxiety with Chinese ESL learners. System 39, no. 2: 202–14. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, G. and J.J. Irvine. 2002. The role of empathy in teaching culturally diverse students: a qualitative study of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education 53, no. 5: 433–43. doi: 10.1177/002248702237397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, K. 2007. Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies, ed. A. Mackey, 323–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, K. and A. Mackey. 2006. Responses to recasts: repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning 56, no. 4: 693–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, R. 2011. Teacher cognition in corrective feedback in Japan. System 39, no. 4: 451–67. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, F.A. and E.E. Tarone. 2003. Impact of classroom dynamics on the effectiveness of recasts in second language acquisition. Language Learning 53, no. 2: 325–68. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. 2007. Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 57, no. 4: 511–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. 2009. Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning 59, no. 2: 411–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. 2011. Immediate learner repair and its relationship with learning targeted forms in dyadic interaction. System 39, no. 1: 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. 2000. Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning 50, no. 1: 119–51.
   Google Scholar
• Panova, I. and R. Lyster. 2002. Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 36, no. 4: 573–95. doi: 10.2307/3588241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, M. 2014. Investigating learner engagement with oral corrective feedback: aims, methodology, outcomes. In Awareness in Action: The Role of Consciousness in Language Acquisition, eds. A. Lyda and K. Szcześniak, 69–84. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, J. 2003. Constraints on ‘noticing the gap’: nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, no. 1: 99–126. doi: 10.1017/S0272263103000044
   Google Scholar
• Polio, C., S. Gass and L. Chapin. 2006. Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, no. 2: 237–67. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassaei, E. 2013. The effects of foreign language anxiety on EFL learners’ perceptions of oral corrective feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 9, no. 2: 87–101. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2013.837912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J.C. and W.A. Renandya. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. and N. Spada. 2006. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching, eds. J.D. Norris and L. Ortega, 133–64. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, R.A. 1996. Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals 29, no. 3: 343–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, R.A. 2001. Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback. The Modern Language Journal 85, no. 2: 244–58. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8, no. 3: 263–300. doi: 10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2006. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research 10, no. 4: 361–92. doi: 10.1191/1362168806lr203oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2008. Recasts, Language Anxiety, Modified Output, and L2 Learning. Language Learning 58, no. 4: 835–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. and R. Ellis. 2011. Corrective feedback in L2 teaching. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, ed. E. Hinkel, 593–610. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2013. The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching 46, no. 2: 195–207. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trofimovich, P., A. Ammar and E. Gatbonton. 2007. How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition, ed. A. Mackey, 144–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, no. 2: 327–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. 1999. What’s wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review 55, no. 4: 437–56. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. and A. Hsu. 2008. Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17, no. 4: 292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez, V. and J. Harvey. 2010. Raising teachers’ awareness about corrective feedback through research replication. Language Teaching Research 14, no. 4: 421–43. doi: 10.1177/1362168810375365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. and R. Lyster. 2010. Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, no. 2: 235–63. doi: 10.1017/S0272263109990519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. 2010. How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? The Modern Language Journal 94, no. 2: 293–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H. 2013. The dynamic interactive relationship between Chinese secondary school EFL teachers’ beliefs and practice. The Language Learning Journal 41, no. 2: 192–204. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2013.790133
   Google Scholar
• Zyzik, E. and C. Polio. 2008. Incidental focus on form in university Spanish literature courses. The Modern Language Journal 92, no. 1: 53–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar