Metapragmatic instruction (6Rs) versus input-based practice: a comparison of their effects on pragmatic accuracy and speed in the recognition and oral production of English refusals

References

• Alcón-Soler, E. 2005. Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System 33, no. 3: 417–435. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Alcón-Soler, E. 2007. Fostering EFL learners’ awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks. In Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning, ed. G. Mayo, 221–241. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Alcón-Soler, E. and J. Guzman-Pitarch. 2013. The effect of instruction on learners’ use and negotiation of refusals. In Refusals in Instructional Contexts and Beyond, ed. O. Martí-Arnándiz and P. Salazar-Campillo, 41–46. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Issa, A. 2003. Sociocultural transfer in L2 speech behaviors: evidence and motivating factors. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 27, no. 5: 581–601. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00055-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2001. Evaluating the empirical evidence: grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. G. Kasper and K.R. Rose, 13–32. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., S. Mossman and H.E. Vellenga. 2014. The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research 19: 324–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, L., T. Takahashi and R. Uliss-Weltz. 1990. Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In Developing Communication Competence in A Second Language, ed. R. Scarcella, E. Anderson and S. Krashen, 55–73. New York, NY: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. 2000. “You-ser” friendly metalanguage: what effect does it have on learners of English? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 38: 195–211. doi: 10.1515/iral.2000.38.3-4.195
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. 1993. Symbolic representation and attentional control. In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka, 43–59. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.J. 1996. Cross-Cultural Comparison of English and Chinese Metapragmatics in Refusal. Department of Language Education, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 1996. Exploring automatization processes. TESOL Quarterly 30, no. 2: 349–357. doi: 10.2307/3588151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 1997. Beyond explicit rule learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, no. 2: 195–221. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197002040
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 1998. Beyond focus on form: cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 42–63. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 2001. Automaticity and automatization. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 125–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 2007a. The future of practice. In Practice in A Second Language: Perspectives From Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology, ed. R. DeKeyser, 287–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 2007b. Introduction: situating the concept of practice. In Practice in A Second Language: Perspectives From Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology, ed. R. DeKeyser, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 2007c. Skill acquisition theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, ed. B. VanPatten and J. Williams, 97–113. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 2009. Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In The Handbook of Language Teaching, ed. M.H. Long and C.J. Doughty, 119–137. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ebsworth, M.E. and N. Kodama. 2011. The pragmatics of refusals in English and Japanese: alternative approaches to negotiation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 208: 95–117.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N.C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, no. 2: 143–188.
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, Z. 2010. How to develop appropriate refusal strategies. In Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. A. Martínez-Flor and E. Usó-Juan, 217–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, Z. and A. Eslami-Rasekh. 2008. Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, ed. E. Alcón-Soler and A. Martínez-Flor, 178–197. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, Z. and C. Liu. 2013. Learning pragmatics through computer-mediated communication in Taiwan. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language 1, no. 1: 52–73.
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, Z., A. Eslami-Rasekh and A. Fatahi. 2004. The effect of explicit metapragmatic instruction on the speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL-EJ 8, no. 2: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2008. Pedagogical intervention and the development of pragmatic competence in learning Spanish as a foreign language. Issues in Applied Linguistics 16, no. 1: 49–84.
   Google Scholar
• Fordyce, K. 2014. The differential effects of explicit and implicit instruction on EFL learners’ Use of Epistemic Stance. Applied Linguistics 35, no. 1: 6–28. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuya, Y.J. and M.K. Clark. 2001. A comparison of input enhancement and explicit instruction of mitigators. In Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series, ed. B. Lawrence, 111–130. Urbana Champaign, IL: Division of English as an International Language: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuya, Y.J. and Y. Zhang. 2002. Effects of recasts on EFL learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies 21, no. 1: 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, L. and D. Starks. 2001. Screening appropriate teaching materials: closing from textbooks and television soap operas. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 39: 39–50. doi: 10.1515/iral.39.1.39
   Google Scholar
• Halenko, N. and C. Jones. 2011. Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: is explicit instruction effective? System 39, no. 2: 240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemian, M. 2012. Cross-cultural differences and pragmatic transfer in English and Persian refusals. Journal of Teaching Language Skills 4, no. 3: 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, T.A. 2011. Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research 15, no. 2: 159–182. doi: 10.1177/1362168810388694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. 1996. Language Teaching and Skill Learning, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. 1997. Can pragmatic competence be taught? Network 6. University of Hawai’i. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, Honolulu. Available online at http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. 2001. Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. K.R. Rose and G. Kasper, 33–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. and C. Rover. 2005. Pragmatics in second language learning. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, ed. E. Hinkel, 317–334. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. and R. Schmidt. 1996. Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, no. 2: 149–169. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100014868
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, S. 2008. Effects on pragmatic development through awareness-raising instruction: refusals by Japanese EFL learners. In Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, ed. E. Alcón-Soler and A. Martínez-Flor, 153–176. Great Britain: Cromwell Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, G.N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Sh. 2012. The effects of input-based practice on pragmatic development of requests in L2 Chinese. Language Learning 62, no. 2: 403–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Sh. and N. Taguchi. 2014. The effects of practice modality on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese. The Modern Language Journal 98, no. 3: 794–812. doi: 10.1111/modl.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingli, D. 2008. The Effects of Explicit and Implicit Instruction on Appropriacy of English Refusals by Chinese EFL Students. Suranaree University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A. 2006. The effectiveness of explicit and implicit treatments on EFL learners’ confidence in recognizing appropriate suggestions. In Pragmatics and Language Learning, ed. K. Bardovi-Harlig, C.F. Brasfeder and A.S. Omar, 199–225. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A. 2008. The effect of an inductive-deductive teaching approach to develop learners’ use of request modifiers in the EFL classroom. In Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context, ed. E. Alcón, 191–226. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A. and Y.J. Fukuya. 2005. The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System 33, no. 3: 463–480. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A. and E. Usó-Juan. 2006. A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: The 6Rs approach. Applied Language Learning 16, no. 2: 39–63.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Flor, A. and E. Usó Juan. 2011. Research methodologies in pragmatics: eliciting refusals to requests. Elia: Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada 11: 47–88.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.P. 2006. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Refusals of Requests by Australian Native Speakers of English and Vietnamese Learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.T.M., T.H. Pham and M.T. Pham. 2012. The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics 44, no. 4: 416–434. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranta, L. and R. Lyster. 2007. A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In Practice in A Second Language: Perspectives From Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology, ed. R. DeKeyser, 141–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K.R. and C. Ng. 2001. Inductive and deductive approaches to teaching compliments and compliment responses. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. K.R. Rose and G. Kasper, 145–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar Campillo, P., M.S. Jordà and V.C. Espurz. 2009. Refusal strategies: a proposal from a sociopragmatic approach. RæL: Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 8: 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1993. Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka, 21–42. NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N. 2000. Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In Perspectives on Fluency, ed. H. Riggenbach, 200–219. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N. 2003. Automaticity and second language acquisition. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and M. Long, 382–408. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, A.J.B.D. 2003. The effect of instruction on pragmatic development: teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies 22, no. 1: 55–106.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. 2007. Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly 41, no. 2: 313–338. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00061.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. 2008. Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study-abroad context. Language Learning 58, no. 1: 33–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. 2013. Refusals in L2 English: proficiency effects on appropriateness and fluency. In Refusals in Instructional Contexts and Beyond, ed. O. Martí-Arnándiz and P. Salazar-Campillo, 101–119. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. 2001. The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. K. R. Rose and G. Kasper, 171–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. 2006. The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research 10, no. 4: 393–417. doi: 10.1191/1362168806lr198oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. 2008. The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the development of language learners’ pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal 92, no. 3: 369–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. 2009. The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics 30, no. 1: 1–25. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateyama, Y. 2001. Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines: Japanese sumimasen. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. R. Kenneth and G. Kasper, 200–222. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tateyama, Y. 2009. Requesting in Japanese: The effect of instruction on JFL learners’ pragmatic competence. In Pragmatic Competence, ed. N. Taguchi, 129–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4: 91–111. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umale, J. 2011. Pragmatic failure in refusal strategies: British versus Omani interlocutors. Arab World English Journal 2, no. 1: 18–46.
   Google Scholar
• Usó-Juan, E. 2010. Requests: a sociopragmatic approach. In Speech act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues, ed. A. Martínez-Flor and E. Usó-Juan, 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Usó-Juan, E. 2013. Effects of metapragmatic instruction on EFL learners’ production of refusals. In Refusals in Instructional Contexts and Beyond, ed. O. Martí-Arnándiz and P. Salazar-Campillo, 65–99. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Usó-Juan, E. and A. Martínez-Flor. 2008. Teaching learners to appropriately mitigate requests. ELT Journal 62, no. 4: 349–357. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm092
   Google Scholar
• Vellenga, H. 2004. Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: how likely. Tesl-Ej 8, no. 2: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. 2004. The nature of processing instruction. In Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary, ed. B. VanPatten, 33–63. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimi, D.R. 2001. Explicit instruction and JFL learner’s use of interactional discourse markers. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. R. Kenneth and G. Kasper, 223–244. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar