The effects of rehearsal and strategic task planning on L2 Willingness to Communicate

References

• Baker, S.C. and P.D. MacIntyre. 2000. The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning 50: 311–41. DOI:10.1111/0023-8333.00119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y.K. 2011. Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System 39: 468–79. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y.K. 2013. Exploring dynamism in willingness to communicate: a longitudinal case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 36: 160–76. doi: 10.1075/aral.36.2.03cao
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. K. 2014. A socio-cognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly 48: 789–814. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002 doi: 10.1002/tesq.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y.K. and J. Philp. 2006. Interactional context and willingness to communicate: a comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System 34: 480–93. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, R., S.C. Baker and P.D. MacIntyre. 2003. Willingness to communicate in a second language: the effects of context, norms and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22: 190–209. DOI:10.1177/0261927X03022002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clément, R. 1980. Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language. In Language: Social Psychological Perspectives, ed. H. Giles, W.P. Robinson and P.M. Smity, 147–154. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2005. Planning and task-based performance: theory and research. In Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language, ed. R. Ellis, 3–34. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics 30, no. 4: 474–509. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah, N. 2014. Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: a structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences 30: 140–7. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.J. 2005. Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System 33: 277–92. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. and C.F. Hsu. 2008. Willingness to communicate in intercultural interactions between Chinese and Americans. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 37, no. 2: 75–88. doi: 10.1080/17475750802533356
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D. 1994. Variables underlying willingness to communicate: a causal analysis. Communication Research Reports 11: 135–42. DOI:10.1080/08824099409359951.
   Google Scholar
• MacLntyre, P., S. Baker, R. Clement and S. Concord. 2001. Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientation. Journal of Language and Social Pscychology 15: 3–26. doi: 10.1177/0261927X960151001
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D., S.C. Baker, R. Clement and L. Donovan. 2002. Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning 52, no. 3: 537–64. DOI:10.1111/1467-9922.00194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D., S.C. Baker, R. Clement and L. Donovan. 2003. Talking in order to learn: willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review 59, no. 4: 589–608. DOI:10.3138/cmlr.59.4.589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D. and R.A. Blackie. 2012. Action control, motivated strategies, and integrative motivation as predictors of language learning affect and the intention to continue learning French. System 40: 533–43. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2012.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D., C. Burns and A. Jessome. 2011. Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: a qualitative study of French immersion students’ willingness to communicate. The Modern Language Journal 95, no. 1: 81–96. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01141.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D., R. Clement, Z. Dornyei and K. Noels. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal 82: 545–62. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D. and J. Doucette. 2010. Willingness to communicate and action control. System 38: 161–71. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J.C. 1992. Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly 40, no. 1: 16–25. doi: 10.1080/01463379209369817
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J.C. and J.E. Baer. 1985. Willingness to communicate: the construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J.C. and V.P. Richmond. 1990. Willingness to communicate: differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal 56: 72–7. DOI:10.1080/10417949009372817.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J.C. and V.P. Richmond. 1991. Willingness to communicate: a cognitive view. In Communication, Cognition, and Anxiety, ed. M. Booth-Butterfield, 19–37. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B. and M.A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Source Book. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Noels, K.A. and R. Clément. 1996. Communicating across cultures: social determinants and acculturative consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement 28, no. 3: 214–228. DOI:10.1037/0008-400x.28.3.214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öz, H., M. Demirezen and L. Pourfeiz. 2015. Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences 37: 269–75. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J.E. 2007a. Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL 2: 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J.E. 2007b. Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL classroom: a cultural perspective. In English Language Teaching in China: New Approaches, Perspectives and Standards, ed. J. Liu, 250–69. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. and L. Woodrow, 2010. Willingness to communicate in english: a model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning 60, no. 4: 834–876. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J.E. 2012. Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System 40: 203–13. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2012.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J.-E. and L. Woodrow. 2010. Willingness to communicate in English: a model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning 60: 834–76. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1989. Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2000. French immersion research in Canada: recent contributions to SLA and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20: 199–211. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500200123
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A. and C. Teddlie. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, M. and N. Zarrinabadi. 2016. Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1–13. DOI:10.1080/17501229.2016.1195391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, W.P. and R. Clement. 2003. A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture, and Curriculum 16, no. 1: 18–38. DOI:10.1080/07908310308666654.
   Google Scholar
• Yashima, T. 2002. Willingness to communicate in a second language: the Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal 86: 54–66. DOI:10.1111/1540-4781.00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashima, T., L. Zenuk-Nishide and K. Shimizu. 2004. The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning 54, no. 1: 119–52. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrinabadi, N. 2013. Investigating the relationship between willingness to communicate and communication apprehension and linguistic and pragmatic competence of Iranian EFL learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, Allameh Tabataba’I University, Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrinabadi, N. 2014. Communicating in a second language: investigating the effect of teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System 42: 288–95. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2013.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrinabadi, N. and R. Abdi. 2011. Willingness to communicate and language learning orientations in Iranian EFL context. International Education Studies 4, no. 4: 206–214. DOI:10.5539/ies.v4n4p206.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrinabadi, N, S. Ketabi and R. Abdi. 2014. Facilitating willingness to communicate in the second language classroom and beyond. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 87, no. 5: 213–217. DOI:10.1080/00098655.2014.924895.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrinabadi, N. and N. Tanbakooei. 2016. Willingness to communicate: rise, development, and some future directions. Language and Linguistics Compass 10, no. 1: 30–45. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar