Investigating collective-efficacy in the foreign language classroom

References

• Alavi, S.B., and J. McCormick. 2008. The roles of perceived task interdependence and group members’ interdependence in the development of collective efficacy in university student group contexts. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 78, no. 3: 375–393. doi: 10.1348/000709907X240471
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 28, no. 2: 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2000. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9, no. 3: 75–78. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2006. Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, ed. F. Pajares and T. Urdan, 307–337 , Vol. 5. Charlotte: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T.G., and C.M. Fox. 2007. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H.D., and H. Lee. 2015. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 4th ed. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, L.Y.H. 2010. Group processes and EFL learners’ motivation: a study of group dynamics in EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 44, no. 1: 129–154. doi: 10.5054/tq.2010.213780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, K.J. 2006. Can’t we pick our own groups? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes. Journal of Management Education 30, no. 4: 557–569. doi: 10.1177/1052562905284872
   Google Scholar
• Clément, R., Z. Dörnyei, and K.A. Noels. 1994. Motivation, self-confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning 44, no. 3: 417–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Doi, T. 1973. The Anatomy of Dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and A. Malderez. 1997. Group dynamics and foreign language teaching. System 25, no. 1: 65–81. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00061-9
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and T. Murphey. 2003. Group Dynamics in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., P.D. MacIntyre, and A. Henry. 2014. Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, C.C., E.A. Locke, J.M.L. Poon, and P.L. McLeod. 2000. Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information-seeking strategy, and performance. Human Performance 13, no. 2: 115–138. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D.R. 2010. Group Dynamics. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2007. Learner strategies and self-efficacy: making the connection. Language Learning 35, no. 1: 81–93. doi: 10.1080/09571730701315832
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. 2001. Collective efficacy: a neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 93, no. 3: 467–476. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S.M., K.A. Incalcaterra, A. Joshi, and J.M. Beaubien. 2002. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, no. 5: 819–832. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneda, M. 2006. Classrooms as communities of practice: a reevaluation. TESOL Quarterly 40, no. 4: 807–817. doi: 10.2307/40264309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmer, J. 2010. The Practice of English Language Teaching, 4th ed. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J.A. 2002. Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: Interactional Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, P.P.H., and H.S. Kang. 2010. Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning 60, no. 3: 606–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, C., J. Kormos, and D. Minn. 2017. Task repetition and second langauge speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39, no. 1: 167–196. doi: 10.1017/S0272263116000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., and L. Cameron. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeming, P. 2011. Japanese high school students' use of L1 during pair-work tasks. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 21: 360–82.
   Google Scholar
• Leeming, P. 2014. Group formation and longevity in the foreign language classroom: Students' views. The Journal of Asia TEFL 11, no. 3: 103–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J.M., and R.L. Moreland. 2006. Small Groups: Key Readings. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J.M. 2007. A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch-Model Computer Program. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J.M., and B.D. Wright. 2007. WINSTEPS: Multiple-choice, Rating Scale, and Partial Credit Rasch Analysis [Computer Software]. Chicago, IL: MESA.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M.H., and P.A. Porter. 1985. Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 19, no. 2: 207–228. doi: 10.2307/3586827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty, S.G., G.M. Jacobs, and A.C. DaSilva Iddings. 2006. Cooperative Learning and Second Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, J., and S.H. McDonough. 1997. Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T.F. 1996. Measuring Second Language Performance. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., and B. Glassner. 2004. The “inside” and the “outside”: finding realities in interviews. In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. D. Silverman, 125–139. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, N. 2009. A guide du Routard simulation: increasing self-efficacy in the standards through project-based learning. Foreign Language Annals 42, no. 4: 607–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, N. 2014. Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. In Multiple Perspectives on the Self in SLA, ed. S. Mercer and M. Williams, 6–19. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, N., F. Pajares, and C. Herron. 2007. Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning 57, no. 3: 417–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N.D., D.L. Feltz, and S.E. Short. 2004. Collective efficacy and team performance: a longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 8, no. 2: 126–138. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, M. 1998. A useful and popular lesson? Comparing students working in pairs and threes in the ESL classroom. RELC Journal 29, no. 2: 27–49. doi: 10.1177/003368829802900202
   Google Scholar
• Pescosolido, A.T. 2001. Informal leaders and the development of group efficacy. Small Group Research 32, no. 1: 74–93. doi: 10.1177/104649640103200104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W., and A.S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A.D., D. Lee, and A.J. Nyberg. 2009. Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. The Journal of Applied Psychology 94, no. 3: 814–828. doi: 10.1037/a0015659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., and L.S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tasa, K., S. Taggar, and G.H. Seijts. 2007. The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology 92, no. 1: 17–27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.L., and G.J. Hwang. 2012. The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers and Education 58, no. 2: 679–687. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., and S. Lin. 2007. The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 23, no. 5: 2256–2268. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, D., and J. Willis. 2007. Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B.D. 2003. Rack and stack: time 1 vs. time 2 or pre-test vs. post-test. Rasch Measurement Transactions 17, no. 1: 905–906.
   Google Scholar