Efficient strategies in course planning for low-resource minority language classes in higher education: observations from Uralic studies and the example of South Estonian

References

• Aasmäe, N. 2014. An Introductory Course of the Erzya Language. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Paul Ariste soome-ugri põlisrahvaste keskuse üllitised. http://www.murre.ut.ee/arhiiv/naita.php?t=kasikiri&id=5504.
   Google Scholar
• Abondolo, D. 2017. Uralic Languages. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935345-e-6.
   Google Scholar
• Allwright, D. 2005. Developing principles for practitioner research: the case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal 89, no. 3: 353–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. 2011. Reshaping pedagogies for a plurilingual agenda. The Language Learning Journal 39, no. 2: 135–47. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2011.573683.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, P.K. 2007. Training for language documentation: experiences at the school of oriental and African studies. In Documenting and Revitalizing Austronesian Languages, ed. D. Victoria Rau and Margaret Florey, Chap. 3, 25–41. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Berényi-Kiss, H., Laakso, J. and Parfuss, A. 2013. Hungarian in Austria. Vol. 22 of Studies in European Language Diversity. Mainz: ELDIA. https://hdl.handle.net/11353/10.308806.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, R. and Hasselblatt, C. 2003. The endangered Uralic languages. In Language Death and Language Maintenance. Theoretical, practical and descriptive approaches, ed. M. Janse and S. Tol, 107–141. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: 10.1075/cilt.240.08blo.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M. and Palincsar, A. 1991. Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 26, no. 3–4: 369–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayboy, B.M.J. and Bang, M. 2019. Societal issues facing indigenous education: introduction. In Handbook of Indigenous Education, ed. E.A. McKinley and L.T. Smith, 1–7. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1839-8_76-2.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A. and Wesche, M. 2003. Content-Based Second Language Instruction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K.D. 2005. Estonian schoolscapes and the marginalization of regional identity in education. European Education 37, no. 3: 78–89. doi: 10.1080/10564934.2005.11042390.
   Google Scholar
• Cajete, G.A. 2018. Envisioning indigenous education: applying insights from indigenous views of teaching and learning. In Handbook of Indigenous Education, ed. E.A. McKinley and L.T. Smith, 1–23. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1839-8_43-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V. 2002. Portraits of the L2 User. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V. 2013. Materials for adult beginners from an L2 user perspective. In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, ed. B. Tomlinson, 275–290. London and New Delhi and New York and Sydney: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V. 2016. Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• COPIUS. 2018–2021. Community of Practice in Uralic Studies. Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership coordinated at Uppsala University. https://www.univie.ac.at/copius/.
   Google Scholar
• Coronel-Molina, S.M. and McCarty, T.L. 2011. Language curriculum design and evaluation for endangered languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, ed. P.K. Austin and J. Sallabank, Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics, 354–370. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cote-Meek, S. 2017. The age of reconciliation: transforming postsecondary education. In Handbook of Indigenous Education, ed. E.A. McKinley and L.T. Smith, 1–19. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1839-8_37-1.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R.M. 1995. Learning second language grammar rules: an experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, no. 3: 379–410.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. and MacIntyre, P.D. 2014. The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 4, no. 2: 237–74. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/3941.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, J.B. and Hicks, J.H. 2000. Where we've been; What we've learned. In Teaching heritage language learners: Voices from the classroom, ed. J.B. Webb and B.L. Miller, 15–35. Yonkers: ACTFL.
   Google Scholar
• Ehala, M. and Niglas, K. 2007. Empirical evaluation of a mathematical model of ethnolinguistic vitality: the case of Võro. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28, no. 6: 427–44. doi: 10.2167/jmmd537.0.
   Google Scholar
• ELDIA. 2010–2013. European language diversity for all. https://hdl.handle.net/11353/10.80789.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. and Shintani, N. 2014. Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emakeele Selts. 2008. Ennemustitsel Mulgimaal. Tallinn. http://www.digar.ee/id/nlib-digar:193067.
   Google Scholar
• Feez, S. 1999. Text-based syllabus design. TESOL in Context 9, no. 1: 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, L. 2005. Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4, no. 2: 135–47. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158504000700.
   Google Scholar
• Galla, C.K. 2017. Materials development for indigenous language learning and teaching: pedagogy, praxis and possibilities. In Handbook of Indigenous Education, ed. E.A. McKinley and L.T. Smith, 1–19. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1839-8_12-1.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. 2017. From literary languages to dialectal varieties to microlanguages? : historical perspectives on language policy towards South Estonian and Latgalian.” In Language Policy Beyond the State, ed. M. Siiner, K. Koreinik and K. Brown, Vol. 14 of Language Policy, 163–182. Cham: Springer International. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/46749.
   Google Scholar
• Hodara, M. and Xu, D. 2018. Are two subjects better than one? The effects of developmental English courses on language minority and native English-speaking students' community college outcomes. Economics of Education Review 66: 1–13. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775718302620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenack, S.A. and Davidson, C.T. 1987. University marginal instructional costs: implications for charges to overseas students. Economics of Education Review 6, no. 4: 345–55. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0272775787900185.
   Google Scholar
• Hourigan, N. 2007. Minority language media studies: key themes for future scholarship. In Minority Language Media: Concepts, Critiques and Case Studies, ed. M. Cormack and N. Hourigan, 248–265. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• INFUSE. 2015–2018. Integrating Finno-Ugric Studies in Europe. Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership coordinated at LMU Munich. https://www.infuse.finnougristik.uni-muenchen.de.
   Google Scholar
• Kel'makov, V. and Hännikäinen, S. 2008. Udmurtin kielioppia ja harjoituksia [Udmurt grammar and exercises]. Vol. 14 of Apuneuvoja suomalais-ugrilaisten kielten opintoja varten. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Koreinik, K. 2013a. The Seto language in Estonia. Vol. 24 of Studies in European Language Diversity. Mainz: ELDIA. https://hdl.handle.net/11353/10.356607.
   Google Scholar
• Koreinik, K. 2013b. The Võro language in Estonia. Vol. 23 of Studies in European Language Diversity. Mainz: ELDIA. https://hdl.handle.net/11353/10.308888.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. 2006. From communicative competence to symbolic competence. The Modern Language Journal 90, no. 2: 249–52. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00395_3.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. 2009. Third culture and language education. In Contemporary Applied Linguistics, ed. L. Wei and V. Cook, 233–254. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, J. 2009. Networks of Finno-Ugric studies. In The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society, Vol. 258 of Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia, 79–93. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, J. 2015. The Finno-Ugric foundations of language teaching. Lähivõrdlusi. Lähivertailuja 25: 172–90. doi: 10.5128/lv25.07.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, W.E. 1975. Culture and language as factors in learning and education. In Education of Immigrant Students, ed. A. Wolfgang, 55–83. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D., Dam, L. and Legenhausen, L. 2017. Language Learner Autonomy. Theory, Practice and Research. Vol. 117 of Second Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. and Maclean, J. 2000. Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research 4, no. 3: 221–50. doi: 10.1177/136216880000400303.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. 2017. Language-focused instruction in content-based classrooms. In The Content-Based Classroom. New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, ed. M.A. Snow and D.M. Brinton, 109–123. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marjomaa, M. 2014. North Sámi in Norway. Vol. 31 of Studies in European Language Diversity. Mainz: ELDIA. https://hdl.handle.net/11353/10.361122.
   Google Scholar
• Muikku-Werner, P. 2013. Vironkielisen tekstin ymmärtäminen suomen kielen pohjalta. Lähivõrdlusi. Lähivertailuja 23: 210–37. doi: 10.5128/lv23.09.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 2017. The integrated syllabus: content, tasks, and projects. In The Content-Based Classroom. New Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, ed. M.A. Snow and D.M. Brinton, 124–136. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• OUDB. 2009–2017. Ob-Ugric database. http://www.babel.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/.
   Google Scholar
• Pajusalu, K. 2007. Estonian dialects. In Estonian language, ed. M. Erelt, Vol. 1 of Linguistica Uralica Supplementary Series, 231–272. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia. http://hdl.handle.net/10062/56290.
   Google Scholar
• Pajusalu, K. 2009. The reforming of the Southern Finnic language area. In The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society, Vol. 258 of Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia, 95–107. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, A. 2011. Future directions for the learning of languages in universities: challenges and opportunities. The Language Learning Journal 39, no. 2: 247–57. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2011.573692.
   Google Scholar
• Porsanger, J. 2017. Building Sámi language higher education: the case of Sámi university of applied sciences. In Handbook of Indigenous Education, ed. E.A. McKinley and L.T. Smith, 1–27. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1839-8_40-1.
   Google Scholar
• Reppen, R. 2011. Using corpora in the language classroom. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, ed. B. Tomlinson, 35–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riese, T., Bradley, J., Yakimova, E. and Krylova, G. 2017. Ongaj marij jylme: a comprehensive introduction to the Mari language. University of Vienna. http://www.mari-language.com.
   Google Scholar
• Schoon, I. and Heckhausen, J. 2019. Conceptualizing individual agency in the transition from school to work: a social-ecological developmental perspective. Adolescent Research Review 4, no. 2: 135–48. doi: 10.1007/s40894-019-00111-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, E.N. 1901. Über die transskription der finnisch-ugrischen sprachen. Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen 1: 15–52.
   Google Scholar
• Siiner, M. 2006. Planning language practice: a sociolinguistic analysis of language policy in post-communist estonia. Language Policy 5, no. 2: 161–86. doi: 10.1007/s10993-006-9004-9.
   Google Scholar
• Stipa, G.J. 1990. Finnisch-ugrische Sprachforschung. Vol. 206 of Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Suni, M. 2012. The impact of Finno-Ugric languages in second language research: looking back and setting goals. Lähivõrdlusi. Lähivertailuja 22: 407–38. doi: 10.5128/lv22.14.
   Google Scholar
• Tarsoly, E. and Valijärvi, R.-L. 2011. Linguistics in language teaching: the case of Finnish and Hungarian. The Language Learning Journal 39, no. 2: 219–35. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2011.573690.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. and Masuhara, H. 2018. The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Valijärvi, R.-L. and Tarsoly, E. 2015. Students' perceptions of deductive and inductive methods in teaching reading skills. Language Learning in Higher Education 5, no. 1: 181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Võro Instituut. n.d. Võro Instituut. https://wi.ee/.
   Google Scholar
• Viitso, T.-R. 2007. Rise and development of the Estonian language. In Estonian language, ed. M. Erelt, Vol. 1 of Linguistica Uralica Supplementary Series, 130–230. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia. http://hdl.handle.net/10062/56290.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, T. and Bradley, J. 2018. Exploring Finno-Ugric linguistics through solving IT problems. In Proceedings of the conference on Language Technologies & Digital Humanities, ed. D. Fišer and A. Pančur, University of Ljubljana, 248–253. http://nl.ijs.si/jtdh18/JTDH-2018-Proceedings.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, F.J. 1864. Versuch über den werroehstnischen Dialekt. Saint Petersburg: L'académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2007. From media to multimedia: workflows and language in the digital economy. In Minority Language Media: Concepts, Critiques and Case Studies, ed. M. Cormack and N. Hourigan, 88–106. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, D. 1990. The Lexical Syllabus. A New Approach To Language Learning. London: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Yalden, J. 1987. Principles of Course Design for Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar