Keeping sight of the big picture: a critical response to Ofsted’s 2021 Curriculum Research Review for languages

References

• Bauckham, I. 2016. Modern foreign languages pedagogy review: a review of modern foreign languages teaching practice in Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4. Teaching Schools Council. https://tscouncil.org.uk/mfl-report-2016/.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J.L., and M.A. Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Paper # 6219, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, K. 2019. ‘Speaking French alive’: learner perspectives on their motivation in content and language integrated learning in England. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 13, no. 1: 45–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1314483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, K., T. Mutton, and I. Thompson. 2022. Practical Theorising in Initial Teacher Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2011. Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. 2007. Skill acquisition theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, eds. B. VanPatten, and J. Williams, 97–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2013. Languages programmes of study: Key Stage 3 National Curriculum in England. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-languages-progammes-of-study.
   Google Scholar
• Dombey, H., and E. Bearne. 2010. Teaching Reading: What the Evidence Says. Leicester: United Kingdom Literacy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, P., J. Jones, C. Martin, L. Graham-Matheson, H. Dismore, and R. Sykes. 2004. A Systematic Review of the Characteristics of Effective Foreign Language Teaching to Pupils Between the Ages of 7 and 11. London: EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University of London. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/MFL_2004review.pdf?ver=2006-03-02-125233-317.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. 2009. Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist 44, no. 2: 78–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2005. Principles of instructed language learning. System 33, no. 2: 209-224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., S. Loewen, and R. Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 339–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T., S. Morris, T. Clark, R. Mitchell, J. Needs, E. Tanguay, and B. Tovey. 2018. Rapid evidence assessment: effective second language teaching approaches and methods. Report commissioned by the Welsh Government. https://gov.wales/effective-second-language-teaching-approaches-and-methods-rapid-evidence-assessment (accessed 26 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas. 2017. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., and P. Ó Duibhir. 2011. Effective Language Teaching: A Synthesis of Research. Report 13. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. https://www.ncca.ie/en/resources/effective_language_teaching_a_synthesis_of_research (accessed 28 September 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, E.Y., S. Sok, and Z. Han. 2019. Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: a meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 23, no. 4: 428–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and G. Ravenhorst-Kalovski. 2010. Lexical threshold revisited: lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 22, no. 1: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P. M. 2003. SLA research in the classroom/SLA research for the classroom. The Language Learning Journal 28: 4–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730385200151
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., and M. Sato. 2018. Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching 51, no. 3: 285–239. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., S. Graham, and R. Woore. 2015. Improving foreign language teaching: Towards a research-based curriculum and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., and L. Trman. 2006. Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference?. Language Teaching Research 10, no. 3: 297-327. https://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk:2102/https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr197oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, V.A., H. Arndt, J. Briggs Baffoe-Djan, H. Chalmers, E. Macaro, H. Rose, R. Vanderplank, and R. Woore. 2020. Foreign language learning and its impact on wider academic outcomes: a rapid evidence assessment. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I., and J. Macalister. 2010. Language Curriculum Design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J., and L. Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50, no. 3: 417–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. PISA 2018 results: are students ready to thrive in an interconnected world? https://www.oecd.org/pisa/innovation/global-competence/.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2021. Curriculum research review series: languages. 7 June 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/curriculum-research-review-series-languages/curriculum-research-review-series-languages.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, D., and V. Hobson. 2019. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) resources overview. file:///C:/Users/robertw/Downloads/CALL_Resources_Overview_2-page.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., and G. Conti. 2016. The Language Teacher Toolkit. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Sockett, G. 2014. The Online Informal Learning of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, N., and Y. Tomita. 2010. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: a meta-analysis. Language Learning 60, no. 2: 263–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, eds. S. Gass, and C. Madden, 235–253. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• The British Academy with the Academy of Medical Sciences, Royal Academy of Engineering and The Royal Society. 2019. Languages in the UK: a call for action. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publications/languages-uk-academies-statement/.
   Google Scholar
• Tinsley, T. 2019. Language trends 2019: language teaching in primary and secondary schools in England. www.britishcouncil.org.
   Google Scholar
• Woore, R. 2014. Developing reading and decoding in the modern foreign languages classroom. In Debates in Modern Languages Education, eds. P. Driscoll, E. Macaro, and A. Swarbrick, 101–115. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, C., A. Oancea and J. Orchard. 2015. The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning: philosophical understandings. Oxford Review of Education 41 (2): 202-216. https://ezproxy-prd.bodleian.ox.ac.uk:2102/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1017406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woore, R., S. Graham, L. Courtney, A. Porter, and C. Savory. 2018. Foreign language education: unlocking reading (FLEUR). https://pdcinmfl.com/fleur-foreign-language-educationunlocking-reading/.
   Google Scholar
• Woore, R., S. Graham, K. Kohl, L. Courtney, and C. Savory. 2020. Consolidating the evidence base for MFL curriculum, pedagogy and assessment reform at GCSE: an investigation of teachers’ views. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:1f797d25-98b4-4b89-863a-779b2348ae20.
   Google Scholar
• Woore, R., T. Mutton, and L. Molway. 2020. ‘It's definitely part of who I am in the role’: developing teachers’ research engagement through a subject-specific Master's programme. Teacher Development 24, no. 1: 88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worth, J., and J. Van den Brande. 2020. Teacher Autonomy: How Does It Relate to Job Satisfaction and Retention? Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar