Pedagogical coaches in childcare: opening the black box between input and output

References

• Adams, G., and M. Rohacek. 2002. “More Than a Work Support? Issues Around Integrating Child Development Goals into the Child Care Subsidy System.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 17 (4): 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-20060200184-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., and K. Smith. 2010. “Identity Work and Critical Social Service Management: Balancing on a Tightrope?” British Journal of Social Work 41 (3): 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. 2005. “Making Sense of Focus Groups.” Medical Education 39 (7): 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02200.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., J. Gordon, and J. Edelmann. 2012. ECEC in Promoting Educational Attainment Including Social Development of Children from Disadvantaged Backgrounds and in Fostering Social Inclusion. Brussels, Belgium: DG EAC.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, C., and S. Biklen. 1998. Qualitative Research in Education. An Introduction to Theory and Methods. 3rd ed. Needham Heights, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Burchinal, M. R., D. Cryer, R. M. Clifford, and C. Howes. 2002. “Caregiver Training and Classroom Quality in Childcare Centers.” Applied Developmental Science 6 (1): 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_01.
   Google Scholar
• Burchinal, M., N. Vandergrift, R. Pianta, and A. Mashburn. 2010. “Threshold Analysis of Association Between Child Care Quality and Child Outcomes for Low-Income Children in Pre-Kindergarten Programs.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25 (2): 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, K. 2010. “How Does Early Childhood Care and Education Affect Cognitive Development? An International Review of the Effects of Early Interventions for Children from Different Social Backgrounds.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25 (2): 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagliari, P. forthcoming. “Reciprocal Formazione in Reggio Emilia.” In The Role of the Pedagogista in Reggio Emilia. Voices and Ideas for a Dialectic Educational Experience, edited by S. Giamminuti, P. Cagliari, C. Giudici, and P. Strozzi. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cagliari, P., M. Castagnetti, C. Giudici, C. Rinaldi, V. Vecchi, and P. Moss, Eds. 2016. Loris Malaguzzi and the Schools of Reggio Emimia: A Selection of His Writings and Speeches, 1945-1993. Routlegde https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315778631.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., and P. Moss. 2007. Care Work in Europe. Current Understandings and Future Directions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke-Stewart, K. A. D., M. Lowe Vandell, M. O. Burchinal, K. McCartney, and K. McCartney. 2002. “Do Regulable Features of Child-Care Homes Affect Children’s Development?” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 17 (1): 52–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00133-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucu-Oancea, O. 2013. “Using Diaries - a Real Challenge for the Social Scientist.” Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences 92:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.665.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., P. Moss, and A. Pence. 2013. Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Languages of Evaluation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J. 2017. The Logic of the Database: In Search of Responsive Social Work. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• DiCicco-Bloom, B., and B. F. Crabtree. 2006. “The Qualitative Research Interview.” Medical Education 40 (4): 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elek, C., and J. Page. 2018. “Critical Features of Effective Coaching for Early Childhood Educators: A Review of Empirical Research Literature.” Professional Development in Education 45 (4): 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Proposal for Key Principles of a Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). Report of the Working Group on Early Childhood Education and Care Under the Auspices of the European Commission. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018a. Council Recommendation on High Quality Early Childhood Education and Care Systems (2018). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018b. Monitoring the Quality of Early Childhood Education and Care – Complementing the 2014 ECEC Quality Framework Proposal with Indicators. Recommendations from ECEC Experts. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2022. Childcare Arrangements in the EU. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220504-2.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2011. “Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy.” British Journal of Social Work 41 (2): 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., and M. Hardy. 2010. Evidence and Knowledge for Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floersch, J., J. L. Longhofer, D. Kranke, and L. Townsend. 2010. “Integrating Thematic, Grounded Theory and Narrative Analysis: A Case Study of Adolescent Psychotropic Treatment.” Qualitative Social Work 9 (3): 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010362330.
   Google Scholar
• Fukkink, R., and A. Lont. 2007. “Does Training Matter? A Meta-Analysis and Review of Caregiver Training Studies.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 22 (3): 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giamminuti, S. forthcoming. “Reciprocal Formazione and Collective Care.” In The Role of the Pedagogista in Reggio Emilia. Voices and Ideas for a Dialectic Educational Experience, edited by S. Giamminuti, P. Cagliari, C. Giudici, and P. Strozzi. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., K. Stewart, E. Treasure, and B. Chadwick. 2008. “Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews and Focus Groups.” British Dental Journal 204 (6): 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. “How Many Interviews are Enough?” Field Methods 18 (1): 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, A. S., and A. Hirallal. 1998. “Which Counts More for Excellence in Childcare Staff—Years in Service, Educational Level or ECE Coursework?” Early Child Development and Care 145 (1): 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443981450103.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, P. E. 2007. “Thinking Critically and Creatively About Focus Groups.” Area 39 (4): 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00766.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasekara, R. S. 2012. “Focus Groups in Nursing Research: Methodological Perspectives.” Nursing Outlook 60 (6): 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, P. S., and M. B. Parshall. 2000. “Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research.” Qualitative Health Research 10 (3): 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russel Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mortelmans, D. 2007. Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2006. Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2012. Starting Strong III: A Quality Toolbox for Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2021. Starting Strong VI: Supporting Meaningful Interactions in Early Childhood Education and Care, Starting Strong. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Page, J., and P. Eadie. 2019. “Coaching for Continuous Improvement in Collaborative, Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Teams.” Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 44 (3): 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119855542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, J. 2012. “Childcare Professionalism in Flanders: An Inside-Outside Perspective.” In Early Childhood Grows Up: Towards a Critical Ecology of the Profession, edited by L. Miller, C. Dalli, and M. Urban, 131–144. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2718-2_9.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, J., and M. Vandenbroeck. 2011. “Childcare Practitioners and the Process of Professionalization.” In Professionalization, Leadership and Management in the Early Years, edited by L. Miller and C. Cable, 62–76. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288795.n5.
   Google Scholar
• Peleman, B., A. Lazzari, I. Budginaitė, H. Siarova, H. Hauari, J. Peeters, and C. Cameron. 2018. “Continuous Professional Development and ECEC Quality: Findings from a European Systematic Literature Review.” European Journal of Education 53 (1): 9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., and C. T. Beck. 2004. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Rutar, S., B. Jensen, A. Marques, M. J. Cardona, S. Van der Mespel, and K. Van Laere. 2019. “Supporting the Collaboration Between ECEC Core and Assisting Practitioners.” In VALUE Literature Review in 4 Countries (BE, DK, PT, SL). Ljubljana, Brussels: ERI.
   Google Scholar
• Slot, P., M.-K. Lerkkanen, and P. Leseman. 2016. The Relations Between Structural Quality and Process Quality in European Early Childhood Education and Care Provisions: Secondary Analyses of Large-Scale Studies in Five Countries. Utrecht: ECEC-CARE, Utrecht University - CARE Project. September 27, 2016. http://ececcare.org/fileadmin/careproject/Publications/reports/CARE_WP2_D2__2_Secondary_data_analyses.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroeck, M. 2009. verzekerde bewaring: honderdvijftig jaar kinderen, ouders en kinderopvang. 2nd ed. Ghent: SWP.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hove, G., and L. Claes. 2011. Qualitative Research and Educational Sciences: A Reader About Useful Strategies and Tools. Ghent: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laere, K., J. Peeters, and M. Vandenbroeck. 2012. “The Education and Care Divide: The Role of the Early Childhood Workforce in 15 European Countries.” European Journal of Education 47 (4): 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar