Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand

References

• Australian Council of Educational Research. (2002). Report on the New Zealand National Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/curriculum/5823
   Google Scholar
• Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, L., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., … Wu, N. (2009). Physics: Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323, 586–587. doi:10.1126/science.1167740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane, J.A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of a democratic education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: the case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41, 287–302. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse: Class codes and control (Vol. 4). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G.J.J. (2011, February 21). Experience, meaning and knowledge: A pragmatist view on knowledge and the curriculum. A paper presented at the ESRC Seminar Series, Curriculum for the 21st Century: Theory, Policy and Practice (Seminar One: Knowledge and the Curriculum), Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G.J.J., & Priestley, M. (2013). A curriculum for the twenty-first century? In M. Priestley & G.J.J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 229–236). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. (1997). The statutory years of secondary education: Change and progress. In M.M. Clark & P. Munn (Eds.), Education in Scotland: Policy and practice from pre-school to secondary (pp. 52–66). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., & Zipin, L. (2013, September 13). National curriculum in a federation: Shelving questions about democracy and equity in Australian schooling? Paper presented at the European Conference for Educational Research, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Codd, J. (2005). Teachers as ‘managed professionals’ in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience. Educational Review, 57, 193–206. doi:10.1080/0013191042000308369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013). The national curriculum in England: Framework document. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/210969/NC_framework_document_-_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1907). Waste in education. In J. Dewey (Ed.), The school and society: Being three lectures by John Dewey supplemented by a statement of the University Elementary School. Retrieved from http://www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Dewey/Dewey_1907/Dewey_1907c.html
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. (2013). Confident individuals: The implications of an ‘emotional subject’ for curriculum priorities and practices. In M. Priestley & G.J.J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 75–98). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Education Scotland. (2013). The curriculum in Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/thecurriculum/
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and schools should teach. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S., & Thomson, G. (2012). Rethinking secondary education: A human-centred approach. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I.F., & Marsh, C.J. (1996). Studying school subjects: A guide. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, D.J., Marki, K.M., Oerke, B., & Holmeier, M. (2012). Statewide low-stakes tests and a teaching to the test effect? An analysis of teacher survey data from two German states. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19, 451–467. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.677803
   Google Scholar
• Jakobi, A.P. (2012). International organisations and policy diffusion: The global norm of lifelong learning. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15, 31–64. doi:10.1057/jird.2010.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A.V. (1999). The curriculum: Theory and practice (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Le Métais, J. (2002). New Zealand stocktake: An international critique. Wellington: The Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/9451/nz-stocktake-an-international-critique.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minty, S., & Priestley, M. (2012). Developing curriculum for excellence: Summary of research findings from a Scottish local authority. Stirling: University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R., & Young, M. (2001). Knowledge and the curriculum in the sociology of education: Towards a reconceptualization. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22, 445–461. doi:10.1080/01425690120094421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Herald. (2013, September 7). Knowledge lost from our kids’ learning: Expert. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11120936
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2009). Reading and writing standards for years 1–8. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/National-Standards/Reading-and-writing-standards
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2013). National standards questions and answers. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/National-Standards/Key-information/Questions-and-answers
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum and freedom in the Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 357–368. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39, 451–461. doi:10.1080/0305006032000162020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M.J. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T.F. Liao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 890–891). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (2011). Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19, 221–237. doi:10.1080/14681366.2011.582258
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G.J.J., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G.J.J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187–206). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Robinson, S., & Biesta, G.J.J. (2012). Teacher agency, performativity and curriculum change: Reinventing the teacher in the Scottish curriculum for excellence? In B. Jeffrey & G. Troman (Eds.), Performativity across UK education: Ethnographic cases of its effects, agency and reconstructions (pp. 87–108). Painswick: E&E Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T., & Jenkings, K.N. (2010). Document analysis. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 380–385). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rata, E. (2012a). The politics of knowledge in education. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 103–124. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.615388
   Google Scholar
• Rata, E. (2012b). The politics of knowledge in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2004a). A curriculum for excellence: The curriculum review group. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2004b). A curriculum for excellence: Ministerial response. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2006). A curriculum for excellence: Progress and proposals. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnema, C. (2011). Monitoring and evaluating curriculum implementation: Final evaluation report on the implementation of the New Zealand Curriculum, 2008-2010. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2013). Trends in international curriculum development. In M. Priestley & G.J.J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 141–164). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, M., McIntyre, D., Pell, T., Hargreaves, L., & Cunningham, M. (2010). Teachers’ conceptions of teacher professionalism in England in 2003 and 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 549–571. doi:10.1080/01411920903018083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. (2010). Educational policy in Scotland: Inclusion and the control society. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 93–104. doi:10.1080/01596300903465443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2011). Exploring well-being in schools: A guide to making children's lives more fulfilling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. (2010). Revisiting school knowledge: Some sociological perspectives on new school curricula. European Journal of Education, 45, 28–44. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L., & Collins, C. (2010). The absence of knowledge in Australian curriculum reforms. European Journal of Education, 45, 89–101. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (2010). Curriculum in Australia: The challenges, the past and the future. In L. Yates, C. Collins, & K. O’Connor (Eds.), Australia's curriculum dilemmas: State cultures and the big issues (pp. 309–326). Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L., & Young, M. (2010). Editorial: Globalization, knowledge and the curriculum. European Journal of Education, 45, 4–10. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2007). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2008). From constructivism to realism in the sociology of the curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 32, 1–28. doi:10.3102/0091732x07308969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2009). Alternative educational futures for a knowledge society. Socialism and education. Retrieved from http://socialismandeducation.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/alternative-educational-futures-for-a-knowledge-society
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar