4,695
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An aims-based curriculum illustrated by the teaching of science in schools

&

References

  • Alma, P. (1993). Environmental concerns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Calabrese Barton, A. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899–917.
  • Cornwell, A., & Cornwell, V. (1993). Drugs, alcohol and human health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • diSessa, A.A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.
  • European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology. Brussels: Author.
  • Gräber, W., & Bolte, C. (Eds.). (1997). Scientific literacy: An international symposium IPN 154. Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitatät Kiel.
  • Halstead, J.M., & Reiss, M.J. (2003). Values in sex education: From principles to practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Harlen, W. (Ed.). (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Hatfield: Association for Science Education. Retrieved from http://www.ase.org.uk/documents/principles-and-big-ideas-of-science-education/.
  • Harris, K. (1999). Aims! Whose aims? In R. Marples, (Ed.), The aims of education (pp. 1–13). London: Routledge.
  • Jenkins, E.W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703–710.
  • Kelly, A.V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Kind, V., & Kind, P.M. (2008). Teaching secondary how science works. London: John Murray.
  • Longbottom, J.E., & Butler, P.H. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education. Science Education, 83, 473–492.
  • Miller, J. (1983). Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29–48.
  • Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Nuffield Foundation.
  • National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Peters, R.S. (1959). Must an educator have an aim? In R.S. Peters (Ed.), Authority, responsibility and education (pp. 83–95). London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Pring, R., Hayward, G., Hodgson, A., Johnson, J., Keep, E., Oancea, A., … Wilde, S. (2009). Education for all: The future of education and training for 14–19 year olds. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Reiss, M.J. (1998). The representation of human sexuality in some science textbooks for 14–16 year-olds. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16, 137–149.
  • Reiss, M.J. (2000). Understanding science lessons: Five years of science teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Reiss, M.J. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school science education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 13–28). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Reiss, M.J., & Sants, H.K.A. (1987). Behaviour and social organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reiss, M.J., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. London: IOE Press.
  • Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-Garden: Norwegian youth's orientations towards science – seen as signs of late modern identities. Oslo: Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.
  • Shamos, M.H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Standish, P. (1999). Education without aims? In R. Marples (Ed.), The aims of education (pp. 35–49). London: Routledge.
  • Tomkins, S. (1998). The origins of humankind (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, J. (2011). Exploring well-being in schools: A guide to making children's lives more fulfilling. London: Routledge.
  • White, J. (2012). Powerful knowledge: Too weak a prop for the traditional curriculum? New Visions for Education Group. Retrieved from http://www.newvisionsforeducation.org.uk/2012/05/14/powerful-knowledge-too-weak-a-prop-for-the-traditional-curriculum/
  • Williams, J.D. (2011). How science works: Teaching and learning in the science classroom. London: Continuum.
  • Young, M.F.D. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
  • Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118.
  • Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.