Mixed signals: employee reactions to talent status communication amidst strategic ambiguity

References

• Andersen, P. & Skaates, M. (2004). Ensuring validity in qualitative international business research. In Welch, C. & Piekkari, R. (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S., Meyerson, D. & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22, 887–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, C. A., & McLean, A. N. (2003). GE's talent machine: The making of a CEO. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A. & Sumelius, J. (2013). Talent or not? Employee reactions to talent identification. Human Resource Management, 52, 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 204–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2005). How, when, and why does outcome favourability interact with procedural fairness? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds), Handbook or Organizational justice. Yahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Church, A. H., Rotolo, C. T., Ginther, N. M., & Levine, R. (2015). How are top companies designing and managing their high potential programs? A follow-up talent management benchmark study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67, 17–47.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Vaiman, V. (2011). European perspectives on talent management. European Journal of International Management, 5, 453–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collings, D.G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 304–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of management, 37, 39–67.
   Google Scholar
• De Boeck, G., Meyers, M.C., & Dries, N. (2018). Employee reactions to talent management: assumptions vs. evidence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong, T. J., & Vijayaraghavan, V. (2003). Let's hear it for B players. Harvard Business Review, 81, 96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dries, N. & De Gieter, S. (2014). Information asymmetry in high potential programs: A potential risk for psychological contract breach, Personnel Review, 43, 136–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2008). ‘Real’ high potential careers: An empirical study into the perspectives of organizations and high potentials. Personnel Review, 37(1), 85–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication monographs, 51, 227–242.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnrooth, M., Björkman, I., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A, Sumelius, J. & Taimitarha, S. (2018) Talent responses to talent status awareness – Not a question of simple reciprocation. Human Resource Management Journal, 28, 443–461.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Aráoz, C., Groysberg, B., & Nohria, N. (2011). How to hang on to your high potentials. Harvard Business Review, 89, 76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festing, M., Kornau, A., & Schäfer, L. (2015). Think talent–think male? A comparative case study analysis of gender inclusion in talent management practices in the German media industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26, 707–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. F. (2013). What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work?. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 290–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo-Gallardo, E., & Thunnissen, M. (2016). Standing on the shoulders of giants? A critical review of empirical talent management research. Employee Relations, 38, 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gap, G. G. (2016). World economic forum. Cologny/Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Gelens, J., Dries, N., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelens, J., Hofmans, J., Dries, N. and Pepermans, R. (2014). TM and organizational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification. Human Resource Management Journal, 24, 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D.E. (2017). Human Resource Management and Employee Well-being: Towards a New Analytic Framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D. E., & Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 12: 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., & Noonan, K. A. (1994). Human resource practices as communications and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33, 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmans, J. (2012). Individual differences in equity models. Psycologica, 33, 473–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglund, M. (2012). Quid pro quo? Examining talent management through the lens of psychological contracts. Personnel Review, 41, 126–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khilji, S. E., Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. S. (2015). Incorporating the macro view in global talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 25, 236–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K. A. (2016). The talent deal and journey: Understanding how employees respond to talent identification over time. Employee Relations, 38, 94–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanvin, B., & Evans, P. (2018). Diversity for Competitiveness. The Global Talent Competitiveness Index, INSEAD, 1–357
   Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S. & Lawrence, T.B (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 57–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The academy of management annals, 8, 57–125.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, A.R. & Singh, P. (2014). ‘High potential’ programs: Let’s hear it for ‘B’ players.’ Human Resource Management Review, 24, 330–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, A., Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Schuler, R. (2017). Talent management: a systematic review and future prospects. European Journal of International Management, 11, 86–128.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, J. & Gilbert, P. (2005). A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nijs, S., Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & Sels, L. (2014). A multidisciplinary review into the definition, operationalization, and measurement of talent. Journal of World Business, 49, 180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petriglieri, J. & Petriglieri, G. (2017). The talent curse. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucik, V., Evans, P., Bjorkman, I., & Morris, S. (2016). The global challenge. International human resource management.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandemose, A. (1933). En flyktning krysser sitt spor: fortelling om en morders barndom (Vol. 28). Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Silzer, R., & Church, A. H. (2009). The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(4), 377–412.
   Google Scholar
• Silzer, R.F. & Church, A.H. (2010). Identifying and assessing high potential talent: current organizational practices. In Silzer, R.F. & Dowell, B.E. (Eds), Strategy Driven TM: A Leadership Imperative, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Slan-Jerusalim, R., & Hausdorf, P. A. (2007). Managers' justice perceptions of high potential identification practices. Journal of Management Development, 26(10), 933–950.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg, M., van Zijderveld, V., & Brinks, M. (2014). The role of talent-perception incongruence in effective talent management. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 272–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87,355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W.H. & Milliken, F.J. (1988). Executives’ Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense. In Hambrick, D. (Ed.) The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers. Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., Corbin, J., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and technique (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suazo, M. M., Martínez, P. G., & Sandoval, R. (2009). Creating psychological and legal contracts through human resource practices: A signaling theory perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 154–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swailes, S. (2013). The ethics of talent management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22, 32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swailes, S., & Blackburn, M. (2016). Employee reactions to talent pool membership. Employee Relations, 38, 112–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansley, C., & Tietze, S. (2013). Rites of passage through talent management progression stages: an identity work perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1799–1815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, J. & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). Talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 326–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. & Nishii, L. (2007). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis (CAHRS Working Paper #07-03). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/468.
   Google Scholar