592
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Virtual interaction and failure learning—The crucial role of team LMX composition

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2991-3022 | Received 29 May 2021, Accepted 21 Nov 2022, Published online: 20 Dec 2022

References

  • Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. Guilford.
  • Ahuja, J. (2010). A study of virtuality impact on team performance. IUP Journal of Management Research, 9(5), 27–56.
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
  • Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00524-1
  • Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2012). The ethical climate and context of organizations: A comprehensive model. Organization Science, 23(6), 1767–1780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0698
  • Badea, C., Jetten, J., Czukor, G., & Askevis‐Leherpeux, F. (2010). The bases of identification: When optimal distinctiveness needs face social identity threat. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(Pt 1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X397665
  • Baker, D. P., Day, R., & Salas, E. (2006). Teamwork as an essential component of high‐reliability organizations. Health Services Research, 41(4 Pt 2), 1576–1598.
  • Banks, G. C., Batchelor, J. H., Seers, A., O’Boyle, E. H., Pollack, J. M., & Gower, K. (2014). What does team-member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1885
  • Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams—Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001003
  • Bernerth, J. B., & Hirschfeld, R. R. (2016). The subjective well-being of group leaders as explained by the quality of leader–member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.04.003
  • Blanchard, A. L. (2021). The effects of Covid-19 on virtual working within online groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983446
  • Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.004
  • Bos-Nehles, A., & Audenaert, M. (2019). LMX and hrm: A multi-level review of how LMX is used to explain the employment relationship. In Keith Townsend, Kenneth Cafferkey, Aoife M. McDermott, & Tony Dundon (Eds.), Elgar introduction to theories of human resources and employment relations (pp. 336–351). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & van den Heuvel, M. (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2013-0088
  • Breugst, N., Patzelt, H., Shepherd, D. A., & Aguinis, H. (2012). Relationship conflict improves team performance assessment accuracy: Evidence from a multilevel study. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0032
  • Brewer, M. B., Manzi, J. M., & Shaw, J. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4(2), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00466.x
  • Brodsky, A. (2021). Virtual surface acting in workplace interactions: Choosing the best technology to fit the task. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(5), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000805
  • Caligiuri, P., De Cieri, H., Minbaeva, D., Verbeke, A., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). International hrm insights for navigating the Covid-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00335-9
  • Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2005). Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning, 38(3), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.04.005
  • Carmeli, A. (2007). Social capital, psychological safety and learning behaviours from failure in organisations. Long Range Planning, 40(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2006.12.002
  • Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.565
  • Carmeli, A., Tishler, A., & Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Ceo relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127011434797
  • Castellano, S., Chandavimol, K., Khelladi, I., & Orhan, M. A. (2021). Impact of self-leadership and shared leadership on the performance of virtual r&d teams. Journal of Business Research, 128, 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.030
  • Chan, L. L., Shaffer, M. A., & Snape, E. (2004). In search of sustained competitive advantage: The impact of organizational culture, competitive strategy and human resource management practices on firm performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519032000157320
  • Choi, D., Kraimer, M. L., & Seibert, S. E. (2020). Conflict, justice, and inequality: Why perceptions of leader–member exchange differentiation hurt performance in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(6), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2451
  • Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x
  • Cobb, A. T., & Lau, R. S. (2015). Trouble at the next level: Effects of differential leader–member exchange on group-level processes and justice climate. Human Relations, 68(9), 1437–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714557873
  • Cogliser, C. C., Schriesheim, C. A., Scandura, T. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader–member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.010
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
  • Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). (2020). FAQ Covid-19. Retrieved September 22, 2021, from https://www.cssf.lu/wp-content/uploads/FAQ_Covid_19_eng.pdf
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.
  • Dahle, D. Y., & Urstad, S. S. (2022). Mind anchors and heart grips: The role of hrm and LMX in internal branding. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(18), 3736–3764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1931407
  • Dahlin, K. B., Chuang, Y.-T., & Roulet, T. J. (2018). Opportunity, motivation, and ability to learn from failures and errors: Review, synthesis, and ways to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 252–277. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0049
  • Davis, D. D., & Bryant, J. L. (2003). Influence at a distance: Leadership in global virtual teams. Advances in Global Leadership, 3, 303–340.
  • Dawson, J. F. (2003). Do we have enough? The accuracy of incomplete data from small groups. In Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Seattle
  • De Croon, E., Sluiter, J., Kuijer, P. P., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2005). The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: A systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics, 48(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130512331319409
  • De Guinea, A. O., Webster, J., & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49(6), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.08.003
  • De Jong, A., De Ruyter, J. C., & Lemmink, J. G. A. M. (2005). Service climate in self-managing teams: Mapping the linkage of team member perceptions and service performance outcomes in a business-to-business setting. Journal of Management Studies, 42(8), 1593–1620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00558.x
  • Deichmann, D., & Ende, J. v d (2013). Rising from failure and learning from success: The role of past experience in radical initiative taking. Organization Science, 25(3), 670–690. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0870
  • Desai, V. M. (2014). Does disclosure matter? Integrating organizational learning and impression management theories to examine the impact of public disclosure following failures. Strategic Organization, 12(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013517603
  • DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1035
  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
  • Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  • Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886396321001
  • Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Edmondson, A. C., Dillon, J. R., & Roloff, K. S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 269–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/078559811
  • Ellis, S., Mendel, R., & Nir, M. (2006). Learning from successful and failed experience: The moderating role of kind of after-event review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.669
  • Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1104–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020578
  • Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2014). Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory: The relational approach to leadership. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. (pp. 407–433). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.001.0001
  • Etzion, D. (1984). Moderating effect of social support on the stress–burnout relationship. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.615
  • Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(4), 245–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-U
  • Ford, L. R., & Seers, A. (2006). Relational leadership and team climates: Pitting differentiation versus agreement. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.005
  • Forester, G. L., Thoms, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2007). Importance of goal setting in virtual project teams. Psychological Reports, 100(1), 270–274.
  • Furst, S. A., & Cable, D. M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.453
  • Gaba, V., & Joseph, J. (2013). Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in m-form firms. Organization Science, 24(4), 1102–1119. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0788
  • Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028958
  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
  • Gibbs, J. L., Sivunen, A., & Boyraz, M. (2017). Investigating the impacts of team type and design on virtual team processes. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.006
  • Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
  • Gibson, C. B., Gibbs, J. L., Stanko, T. L., Tesluk, P., & Cohen, S. G. (2011). Including the "i" in virtuality and modern job design: Extending the job characteristics model to include the moderating effect of individual experiences of electronic dependence and copresence. Organization Science, 22(6), 1481–1499. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0586
  • Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
  • Gittell, J. H. (2002). Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science, 48(11), 1408–1426.
  • Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(82)90236-7
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl‐Bien, M. (1995). Relationship‐based approach to leadership: Development of leader‐member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi‐level multi‐domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  • Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 58–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393591
  • Greve, H. R. (2003). Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge University Press.
  • Greve, H. R., & Gaba, V. (2020). Performance feedback in organizations and groups: Common themes. In L. Argote & J. M. Levine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group and organizational learning. (pp. 315–335). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263362.013.13
  • Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX’s influence on ocb and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.001
  • He, J., Morrison, A. M., & Zhang, H. (2021). How high-performance HR practices and LMX affect employee engagement and creativity in hospitality. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(8), 1360–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348021996800
  • Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
  • Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2008). Leader–member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1208–1219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012678
  • Hinds, P., Kiesler, S. B., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Distributed work. MIT Press.
  • Hirst, G., van Dick, R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity [Article]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 963–982. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=44172571&site=ehost-live https://doi.org/10.1002/job.600
  • Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared leadership. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030264
  • Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal leader–member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.002
  • Hornung, S., & Glaser, J. (2009). Home-based telecommuting and quality of life: Further evidence on an employee-oriented human resource practice. Psychological Reports, 104(2), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.104.2.395-402
  • Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.680
  • Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
  • Jimenez, A., Boehe, D. M., Taras, V., & Caprar, D. V. (2017). Working across boundaries: Current and future perspectives on global virtual teams. Journal of International Management, 23(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.05.001
  • Johnson, S. K., Bettenhausen, K., & Gibbons, E. (2009). Realities of working in virtual teams: Affective and attitudinal outcomes of using computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 40(6), 623–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409346448
  • Kc, D., Staats, B. R., & Gino, F. (2013). Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Science, 59(11), 2435–2449. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1720
  • Khanna, R., Guler, I., & Nerkar, A. (2016). Fail often, fail big, and fail fast? Learning from small failures and R&D performance in the pharmaceutical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 436–459. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1109
  • Kim, T. Y., Liden, R. C., Liu, Z., & Wu, B. (2022). The interplay of leader–member exchange and peer mentoring in teams on team performance via team potency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(5), 932–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2590
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279113
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/256874
  • Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from sabre, inc. The Academy of Management Executive, 16, 67–79.
  • Klitmøller, A., & Lauring, J. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.023
  • Krishnan, V. R. (2005). Leader-member exchange, transformational leadership, and value system. EJBO-Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 10(1), 14–21.
  • Lawton, R., Carruthers, S., Gardner, P., Wright, J., & McEachan, R. R. (2012). Identifying the latent failures underpinning medication administration errors: An exploratory study. Health Services Research, 47(4), 1437–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01390.x
  • Lee, J. (2008). Effects of leadership and leader‐member exchange on innovativeness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810894747
  • Leroy, H., Segers, J., Van Dierendonck, D., & Den Hartog, D. (2018). Managing people in organizations: Integrating the study of hrm and leadership. Human Resource Management Review, 28(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.002
  • Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
  • Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.409
  • Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407–416.
  • Lu, Mei., Wynn, Eleanor., Chudoba, Katherine and Watson-Manheim, Mary, “Understanding Virtuality in a Global Organization: Toward a Virtuality Index” (2003). ICIS 2003 Proceedings, 78. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2003/78
  • Major, D. A., Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., & Gardner, P. D. (1995). A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(3), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.418
  • Manata, B. (2020). The effects of LMX differentiation on team performance: Investigating the mediating properties of cohesion. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819842792
  • Martin, R., Thomas, G., Legood, A., & Dello Russo, S. (2018). Leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2202
  • Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002
  • Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task–technology fit perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975–990.
  • Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
  • McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. Rinehart and Winston.
  • McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/259034
  • Meschi, P.-X., & Métais, E. (2015). Too big to learn: The effects of major acquisition failures on subsequent acquisition divestment. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12101
  • Morgeson, F. P., Mumford, T. V., & Campion, M. A. (2005). Coming full circle: Using research and practice to address 27 questions about 360-degree feedback programs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.57.3.196
  • Muethel, M., Gehrlein, S., & Hoegl, M. (2012). Socio‐demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21488
  • Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
  • Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
  • Palumbo, R. (2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0150
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
  • Pohl, R. F., & Hell, W. (1996). No reduction in hindsight bias after complete information and repeated testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0064
  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
  • Purvanova, R. K., & Kenda, R. (2022). The impact of virtuality on team effectiveness in organizational and non‐organizational teams: A meta‐analysis. Applied Psychology, 71(3), 1082–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12348
  • Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282–1290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029359
  • Richter, A. W., West, M. A., van Dick, R., & Dawson, J. F. (2006). Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1252–1269. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478720
  • Rico, R., Bachrach, D. G., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., & Collins, B. J. (2011). The interactive effects of person-focused citizenship behaviour, task interdependence, and virtuality on team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(5), 700–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.495206
  • Saunders, C. S., & Ahuja, M. K. (2006). Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small Group Research, 37(6), 662–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294323
  • Schweitzer, L., & Duxbury, L. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x
  • Semrau, T., & Hopp, C. (2016). Complementary or compensatory? A contingency perspective on how entrepreneurs’ human and social capital interact in shaping start-up progress. Small Business Economics, 46(3), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9691-8
  • Semrau, T., Steigenberger, N., & Wilhelm, H. (2017). Team political skill and team performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2016-0074
  • Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. (2005). The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(6), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.331
  • Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.
  • Sivunen, A. (2006). Strengthening identification with the team in virtual teams: The leaders’ perspective. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(4), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9046-6
  • Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277792
  • Stewart, M. M., & Johnson, O. E. (2009). Leader—member exchange as a moderator of the relationship between work group diversity and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 34(5), 507–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331220
  • Stogdill, R. M. (1959). Individual behavior and group achievement: A theory; the experimental evidence. Oxford University.
  • Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass.
  • Tageblatt.lu. (2020). Coronakrise/premier bettel: Notstand wird in luxemburg sofort ausgerufen Tageblatt Letzebuerg. https://www.tageblatt.lu/headlines/premier-bettel-infomiert-luxemburg-ueber-die-corona-lage/
  • Thomas, G., Martin, R., & Riggio, R. (2013). Leading groups: Leadership as a group process. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212462497
  • Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M. L., & West, M. (2004a). Reflexivity for team innovation in china. The Contribution of Goal Interdependence. Group & Organization Management, 29(5), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103254911
  • Tjosvold, D., Yu, Z-y., & Hui, C. (2004b). Team learning from mistakes: The contribution of cooperative goals and problem-solving. Journal of Management Studies, 41(7), 1223–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00473.x
  • Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17–29.
  • Tse, H. H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.005
  • Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089–1121. https://doi.org/10.2307/256928
  • Tuggle, C. S., Sirmon, D. G., Reutzel, C. R., & Bierman, L. (2010). Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and ceo duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 946–968.
  • Venkataramani, V., Richter, A. W., & Clarke, R. (2014). Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: Leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical creativity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 966–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037088
  • Wang, K. L., & Groth, M. (2014). Buffering the negative effects of employee surface acting: The moderating role of employee–customer relationship strength and personalized services. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034428
  • Wang, L. C., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2019). LMX in team-based contexts: Tmx, authority differentiation, and skill differentiation as boundary conditions for leader reciprocation. Personnel Psychology, 72(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12306
  • Webster, J., & Wong, W. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: Identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763883
  • Wegge, J., Roth, C., Neubach, B., Schmidt, K.-H., & Kanfer, R. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1301–1313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012680
  • Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J., & Harvey, P. (2010). Moderating and mediating the hrm effectiveness — Intent to turnover relationship: The roles of supervisors and job embeddedness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(2), 182–196.
  • Wilhelm, H., Richter, A. W., & Semrau, T. (2019). Employee learning from failure: A team-as-resource perspective. Organization Science, 30(4), 694–714. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1255
  • Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001
  • Zaccaro, S. J., & Bader, P. (2003). E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams: Minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00129-8
  • Zhao, B. (2011). Learning from errors: The role of context, emotion, and personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 435–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.696
  • Zigurs, I. (2003). Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00132-8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.