Exploring the impact of using automated writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students' writing

References

• Beatty , K. 2003 . Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning , New York : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Chandler , J. 2003 . The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing . Journal of Second Language Writing , 12 : 267 – 296 . doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang , Y.C. , Chang , J.S. , Chen , H.J. and Liou , H.C. 2008 . An automatic collocation writing assistant for Taiwanese EFL learners: A case of corpus-based NLP technology . Computer Assisted Language Learning , 21 : 283 – 299 . doi: 10.1080/09588220802090337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , C.F. and Cheng , W.Y. 2006 . The use of a computer-based writing program: Facilitation or frustration? . Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in ROC , 1 : 112 – 129 .
   Google Scholar
• Chen , C.F. and Cheng , W.Y. 2008 . Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes . Language Learning & Technology , 12 : 94 – 112 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaveland , M.C. and Larkins , E.R. 2004 . Web-based practice and feedback improve tax students' written communication skills . Journal of Accounting Education , 22 : 211 – 228 . doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2004.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Darus , S. , Ismail , K. and Ismail , M.B.M. 2008 . Effects of word processing on Arab postgraduate students' essays in EFL . European Journal of Social Sciences , 7 : 63 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• Denton , P. 2001 . Generating coursework feedback for large groups of students using MS Excel & MS Word . University Chemistry Education , 5 : 1 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Denton , P. Evaluation of the ‘electronic feedback’ marking assistant & analysis of a novel collusion detection facility . Proceedings of the 7th international computer aided assessment conference . Edited by: Christie , J. pp. 157 – 173 . Loughborough : Learning and Teaching Development .
   Google Scholar
• Denton , P. , Madden , J. , Roberts , M. and Rowe , P. 2008 . Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study . British Journal of Education Technology , 39 : 486 – 500 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab , N.M. 2010 . Effects of peer-versus self-editing on students' revision of language errors in revised drafts . System , 38 : 85 – 95 . doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikli , S. 2006 . An overview of automated scoring of essays . The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment , 5 ( 1 ) : 1 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Ding , T. 2008 . A study of an E-Comment generating system: Development & application , Beijing , , China : National Tsinghua University of Education . (Unpublished master's thesis)
   Google Scholar
• Drechsel , J. 1999 . Writing into silence: Losing voice with writing assessment technology . Teaching English in the Two-Year College , 26 : 380 – 387 .
   Google Scholar
• Ferris , D. and Roberts , B. 2001 . Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? . Journal of Second Language Writing , 10 : 161 – 184 . doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
   Google Scholar
• Ferris , D.R. and Hedgcock , J.S. 2005 . Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice , (2nd ed. , Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Foote , C.J. 1999 . Attribution feedback in the elementary classroom . Journal of Research in Childhood Education , 13 : 155 – 166 . doi: 10.1080/02568549909594736
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths , L. and Nicolls , B. 2010 . E-Support4U: An evaluation of academic writing skills support in practice . Nurse Education in Practice , 10 : 341 – 348 . doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2010.02.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons , L. 2001 . “ Fourth generation writing assessment ” . In On second language writing , Edited by: Silva , T. and Matsuda , P.K. 117 – 125 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Herrington , A. and Moran , C. 2001 . What happens when machines read our students' writing? . College English , 63 : 480 – 499 . doi: 10.2307/378891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvela , A. 2005 . Computer-based reading and writing across the curriculum: Two case studies of L2 writers . Computers and Composition , 22 : 337 – 356 . doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2005.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Hoon , T.B. 2006 . “ Online automated essay assessment: Potentials for writing development ” . In Making a difference with Web technologies. Proceedings of Aus Web 2006 , Edited by: Treloar , A. and Ellis , A. 230 – 234 . Australia : Southern Cross University .
   Google Scholar
• Huang , Y.P. A review of composition teachers' written feedback from learners' perspectives . In Selected Papers from the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching .
   Google Scholar
• Huot , B. 1996 . Computers and assessment: Understanding two technologies . Computers and Composition , 13 : 231 – 243 . doi: 10.1016/S8755-4615(96)90012-2
   Google Scholar
• Kepner , C.G. 1991 . An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills . The Modern Language Journal , 75 : 305 – 313 . doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern , R. and Warschauer , M. 2000 . “ Introduction ” . In Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice , Edited by: Warschauer , M. and Kern , R. 1 – 19 . London : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lai , Y.H. 2009 . Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program? . British Journal of Educational Technology , 41 : 432 – 454 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee , H.K. 2004 . A comparative study of ESL writers' performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test . Assessing Writing , 9 : 4 – 26 . doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Leki , I. 1990 . “ Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response ” . In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom , Edited by: Kroll , B. 57 – 68 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Li , M. 2005 . A tentative study of e-grading mechanisms in the teaching of writing , Beijing : National Tsinghua University . (Unpublished master's thesis)
   Google Scholar
• Li , Y. 2007 . The application of computers in English writing teaching and learning . Journal of Hubei Normal University , 27 ( 5 ) : 139 – 141 .
   Google Scholar
• Liu , L.E. 2002 . A corpus-based lexical semantic investigation of verb-noun miscollocations in Taiwan learners' English , Taipei : Tamkang University . Master's thesis
   Google Scholar
• Milton , J. 2006 . “ Resource-rich Web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers ” . In Feedback in second language writing: Context and issues , Edited by: Hyland , K. and Hyland , F. 123 – 139 . New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Perin , D. , Keselman , A. and Monopoli , M. 2003 . The academic writing of community college remedial students: Text and learner variables . Higher Education , 45 ( 1 ) : 19 – 42 . doi: 10.1023/A:1021237532056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid , J.M. 1994 . Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation . TESOL Quarterly , 28 : 273 – 292 . doi: 10.2307/3587434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei , A.R. and Lovorn , M. 2010 . Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing . Assessing Writing , 15 : 18 – 39 . doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Shang , H.F. 2007 . An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance . Computer Assisted Language Learning , 20 ( 1 ) : 79 – 96 . doi: 10.1080/09588220601118479
   Google Scholar
• Slatin , J.M. 1990 . Reading hypertext: Order and coherence in a new medium . College English , 52 : 870 – 883 . doi: 10.2307/377389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuzi , F. 2004 . The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course . Computers and Composition , 21 : 217 – 235 . doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Wang , J. and Brown , M.S. 2008 . Automated essay scoring versus human scoring: A correlational study . Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education , 8 Retrieved September 26, 2010, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol8/iss4/languagearts/article1.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Warden , C.A. 2000 . EFL business writing behaviors in differing feedback environments . Language Learning , 50 : 573 – 616 . doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware , P.D. and Warschauer , M. 2006 . “ Electronic feedback and second language writing ” . In Feedback in second language writing: Context and issues , Edited by: Hyland , K. and Hyland , F. 104 – 122 . New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer , M. 1999 . Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education , Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer , M. and Ware , P. 2006 . Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda . Language Teaching Research , 10 : 1 – 24 . doi: 10.1191/1362168806lr190oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , Y.F. 2010 . Students' reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing . Computers & Education , 55 : 1202 – 1210 . doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh , Y. , Liou , H.C. and Yu , Y.T. 2007 . The influence of automated essay evaluation and bilingual concordancing on EFL students' writing . English Teaching & Learning , 31 ( 1 ) : 117 – 160 .
   Google Scholar
• Yu , Y.T. 2006 . Effects of automatic essay grading system and bilingual concordancer on EFL college students' writing , Hsinchu , , Taiwan : National Tsinghua University of Education . (Unpublished master's thesis)
   Google Scholar