Evaluation of a blended learning language course: students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas

References

• Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533–550.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolomé, A. (2004). Blended learning: Conceptos básicos. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 23, 7--20.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvois, M. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Smith, T., & Henderson, T. (2007). Student perceptions of assessment efficacy in online and blended classes. In A. G. Picciano & C. D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (pp. 145–160). Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2009a). Using WebCT in a course of English for academic/specific purposes: The case of English for agriculture. In I. Gonzalez-Pueyo, C. Foz, M. Jaime, & M. J. Luzon (Eds.), Teaching academic and professional English online (pp. 127–152). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2009b). WebCT design and users’ perceptions in English for agriculture. In R. V. Marriott & P. L. Torres (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-learning methodologies for language acquisition (pp. 480–496). New York/London: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Burguess, L. A. (2003). WebCT as an e-learning tool: A study of technology students’ perceptions. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, T. (2007). Marrying two existing software packages into an efficient online tutoring tool. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 459–468.
   Google Scholar
• Carrió Pastor, M. L. (2009). Enhancing learner-teacher collaboration through the use of online activities. In I. Gonzalez-Pueyo, C. Foz, M. Jaime, & M. J. Luzon (Eds.), Teaching academic and professional English online (pp. 107–126). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, N. A., Ushida, E., & Murday, K. (2006). Student learning in hybrid French and Spanish courses: An overview of language online. CALICO Journal, 24, 115–145.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. A. (2005). CALL from the margins: Effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL, 17, 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Conacher, J. E., Taalas, P., & Vogel, T. (2004). New language learning and teaching environments: How does ICT fit in? In A. Chambers, J. E. Conacher, & J. Littlemore (Eds.), ICT and language learning: Integrating pedagogy and practice (pp. 9–32). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Curado Fuentes, A. (2004). The use of corpora and IT in evaluating oral task competence for tourism English. CALICO Journal, 22(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• DelliCarpini, M. (2012). Building computer technology skills in TESOL teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 16(2), 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, J., Huff, L., McNeil, L., Preuss, C., & Sellen, J. (2009). Pedagogy, process, and classroom context: Integrating teacher voice and experience into research on technology-enhanced language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 754–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., Steed, A., & Applebee, A. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312–335.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, A. (2006). How to construct surveys: A step-by-step guide (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gimeno Sanz, A. (2009). Online course design and delivery: The Ingenio authoring system. In I. Gonzalez-Pueyo, C. Foz, M. Jaime, & M. J. Luzon (Eds.), Teaching academic and professional English online (pp. 83–105). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the students experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 652–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A., & Earnest Youngs, B. (2001). Using the web in elementary French and German courses: Quantitative and qualitative study results. CALICO Journal, 19, 89–123.
   Google Scholar
• Grgurovic, M. (2011). Blended learning in an ESL class: A case study. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 100–117.
   Google Scholar
• Heins, B., Duensing, A., Stickler, U., & Batstone, C. (2007). Spoken interaction in online and face-to-face language tutorials. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 279–295.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P., & Siskin, C. B. (2004). Another look at tutorial CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 448–461.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M. (2010). Developing the language skills: Aligning the technological tool to the pedagogical purpose. In C. Ward (Ed.), New technologies & language learning ( Anthology Series 51) (pp. 16–27). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Perez, M. V, Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo-Rouet, M., Ney, M., Charles, S., & Lallich-Boidin, G. (2009). Students’ performance and satisfaction with Web vs. paper-based practice quizzes and lecture notes. Computers and Education, 53(2), 375–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Baztán, A. (2008). La evaluación oral: una equivalencia entre las guidelines de ACTFL y algunas escalas del MCER (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr/17457853.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded source book: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Murday, K., Ushida, E., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2008). Learners’ and teachers’ perspectives on language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. (1999). Developing the pedagogical ICT competence of modern foreign languages teacher trainees. Situation: All change and plus ça change. JITTE (Journal of IT for Teacher Education – Special Edition on Modern Foreign Languages), 8(2), 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning-parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers and Education, 48, 250–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osguthorpe, T. R., & Graham, R. C. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Paredes, P., & Martínez-Sánchez, F. (2000–2001). A Spanish version of the foreign language classroom anxiety scale: Revisiting Aida's factor analysis. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada RESLA, 14, 337–352.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M., Weinberg, A., & Sarma, N. (2009). To like or not to like! Student perceptions of technological activities for learning French as a second langue at five Canadian institutions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 8679–8896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polisca, E. (2006). Facilitating the learning process: An evaluation of the use and benefits of a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE)-enhanced Independent Language Learning Program (ILLP). CALICO Journal, 23(3), 499–516.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez Verdugo, M. D. & Alonso Belmonte, M. I. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87--101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, V., & Lemaster, L. (2006). Satisfaction with online learning: A comparative descriptive study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, M., Palmer, J., & Fortanet, I. (2005). Carencias comunicativas orales detectadas por el profesorado de lengua inglesa. In E. Hernández & L. Sierra (Eds.), Lenguas para Fines Específicos (VIII) Investigación y Enseñanza (pp. 63–74). Madrid: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.
   Google Scholar
• Sagarra, N., & Zapata, G. (2008). Blending classroom instruction with online homework: A study of student perceptions of computer assisted L2 learning. ReCALL, 20(2), 208–224.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. F. (2005). Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, costs reduction and effects on student learning. Foreign language Annals, 38(4), 523–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scida, E. E., & Saury, R. E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 517–531.
   Google Scholar
• Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millenium. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, G. (2007). A review of technology choice for teaching language skills in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2), 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended learning environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Strambi, A. (2004). Learners’ perceptions of a web-enhanced learning environment: Insights from a longitudinal study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, R. (2009). The potential of blended learning environments. In I. Gonzalez-Pueyo, C. Foz, M. Jaime, & M. J. Luzon (Eds.), Teaching academic and professional English online (pp. 35–56). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Volle, L. M. (2005). Analyzing oral skills in voice e-mail and online interviews. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 146–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, G., & Kabata, K. (2010). Students’ and instructors’ attitudes toward the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P., & Goertler, S. (2008). Did we forget someone? Students’ computer access and literacy for CALL. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 482–509.
   Google Scholar
• Winke, P., Goertler, S., & Amuzie, G. L. (2010). Commonly taught and less commonly taught language learners: Are they equally prepared for CALL and online language learning? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 199–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. C., & Chen, Y. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 860–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It's about time. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W., Sun, Y., & Chang, Y. (2010). When technology speaks language: An evaluation of course management systems used in a language learning context. ReCALL, 22(3), 332–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7–28.
   Google Scholar