The pedagogical use of mobile speech synthesis (TTS): focus on French liaison

References

• Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M.S. (2005). Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 387–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Burston, J. (2014). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27, 4–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, W., Collins, L., & White, J. (2012). Phonological input enhancement via text-to-speech synthesizers: The L2 acquisition of English simple past allomorphy. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Boston, MA: Research-publishing.net.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, W., Smith, G., & Garcia Fuentes, C. (2015). Evaluating text-to-speech synthesizers. In F. Helm L. Bradley M. Guarda S. Thouësny ( Eds.), Critical CALL – Proceedings of EUROCALL (pp. 108–113). Padova: Cambridge University Press..
   Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., Goodwin, J., & Griner, B. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. (2012). Using mixed-methods research in technology-based innovation for language learning. Paper presented at the Innovative Practices in Computer Assisted Language Learning Conference, University of Ottawa, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. White Plains, NY: Person Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Christison, M.A. (1999). A guidebook for applying multiple intelligences theory in the ESL/EFL classroom. Burlingame, CA: Alta Book Center.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clakr, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal (Special Centenary Volume), 100, 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2009). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 336–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, M., Berglund, P., Kirgis, N., & Buageila, S. (2016). Using Text-to-speech (TTS) for Audio Computer-assisted Self-interviewing (ACASI). Field Methods, 28(2), 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabaghi, A. (2010). Corrective feedback in second language acquisition: Theory, research and practice. Saarbrucken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, D. (1990). The syntax-phonology interface and French liaison. Linguistics, 28, 57–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moras, N. (2011). Acquisition de la liaison et de l'enchaînement en français L2: Le rôle de la fréquence (Doctoral dissertation). London: Western University.
   Google Scholar
• Dejean de La Bâtie, B. (1993). Word boundary ambiguity in spoken French ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Monash University, Victoria: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dekeyser, R.M. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 77(4), 501–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27, 197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Guclu, B., & Yigit, S. (2015). Using text to speech software in teaching Turkish for foreigners: The effects of text to speech software on reading and comprehension abilities of African students. Journal in Humanities, 4(2), 31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hannahs, S. (2007). French phonology and L2 acquisition. In D. Ayoun ( Ed.), French applied linguistics (pp. 50–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, L. (2012). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: A cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, S., & Uther, M. (2009). Mobile devices for language learning: Multimedia approaches. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Karsenti, T., & Fievez, A. (2013). L'iPad à l’école: Usages, avantages et défis: Résultats d'une enquête auprès de 6057 élèves et 302 enseignants du Québec (Canada). Montréal, QC: CRIFPE.
   Google Scholar
• Kataoka, H., Ito, M., & Yamane, S. (2016). Retention of English sentences learned by reading aloud using Text-To-Speech (TTS) speech sounds: A longitudinal study in a Japanese high school. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 5(1), 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C., & Levy, M. (2008). L'italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support beginners’ language learning. ReCALL, 20, 315–330.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, P., & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell phones in task based learning. Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16, 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kinash, S., Brand, J., & Mathew, T. (2012). Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: Student perceptions of Blackboard Mobile Learn and iPads. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 639–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirstein, M. (2006). Universalizing universal design: Applying text-to-speech technology to English language learners’ process writing (Doctoral dissertation), University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Langmia, K., & Glass, A. (2014). Coping with smart phone ‘Distractions’ in a college classroom. Teaching Journalism and Mass Communication, 4(1), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2015). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French /y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B., & Chu, S. (2008). Impact of learning style on achievement when using course content delivered via a game-based learning object. In E. Ferdig ( Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 478–488). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Mastromonaco, S. (1999). Liaison in French as a second language (unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, J., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Park, E. (2002). On three potential sources of comprehensible input for second language acquisition. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C.P., Dalton, B., & Grisham, D.L. (2007). Scaffolding English language learners and struggling readers in a universal literacy environment with embedded strategy instruction and vocabulary support. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rast, R. (2008). Foreign language input: Initial processing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Roedige, P., & Newton, J. (2009). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Appplied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242–248.
   Google Scholar
• Rughooputh, S., & Santally, M. (2009). Instructional integration of text-to-speech software in pedagogically sound teaching and learning scenarios. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 131–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N. (2011). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371–405.
   Google Scholar
• Sevillano-García, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2015). The impact of digital mobile devices in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler-Urzua, F. (2011). The acquisition of English /ɪ/ by Spanish speakers via text-to-speech synthesizers: A quasi-experimental study (Master's thesis). Montreal: Concordia University.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Fox, R. (2008). Using PDA for undergraduate student incidental vocabulary testing. ReCALL, 20(3), 290–314.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 365–383.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockwell, G. (2013). Investigating an intelligent system for vocabulary learning through reading. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(3), 259–274.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. (2004). Phonetic norm versus usage in advanced French as a second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 365–382.
   Google Scholar
• Tranel, B. (1981). Concreteness in generative phonology: Evidence from French. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Praag, B., & Sanchez, H. S. (2015). Mobile technology in second language classrooms: Insights into its uses, pedagogical implications, and teacher beliefs. ReCALL, 27, 288–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauquier, S., & Shoemaker, E. (2013). Convergence and divergence in the acquisition of French liaison by native and non-native speakers: A review of existing data and avenues for future research. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4(2), 160–188.
   Google Scholar