Enhancing beginner learners’ oral proficiency in a flipped Chinese foreign language classroom

References

• Anderson, J. R. (1988). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Readings in Cognitive Science, 89(4), 362–380.
   Google Scholar
• Awwad, A., Tavakoli, P., & Wright, C. (2017). “I think that's what he's doing”: Effects of intentional reasoning on second language (l2) speech performance. System, 67, 158–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejarano, Y. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 483–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M.A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the ASEE national conference (Vol. 30, pp. 1–18). Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement i n the classroom (1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports). ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183..
   Google Scholar
• Boot, W. R., Simons, D. J., Stothart, C., & Stutts, C. (2013). The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: Why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 8(4), 445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bygate, M., Swain, M., & Skehan, P. (2013). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1961). Fundamental considerations in testing for English language proficiency of foreign students. In Testing the English proficiencies of foreign students. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Reprinted in Allen, H. B. & Campbell, R. N. (Eds.) 1972 Teaching English as a second language: a book of readings. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W.C.V., & Marek, M. W. (2016). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. L., & Clifford, R. T. (1988). The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education (7th ed.).London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Everson, M. E. (2011). Best practices in teaching logographic and non-Roman writing systems to L2 learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 249–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 356–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsey, M., Low, M., & Glance, D. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a practice of online pedagogy. The Australian Sociological Association, 49(4), 471–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furneaux, C., Wright, C., & Wilding, E. (2015). First experiences of MOOCS in the UK; The case of the University of Reading's “Beginners’ Guide to writing in English for university study.” In J. R. Corbeil, M. E. Corbeil, & B. H. Khan (Eds.), The MOOC case book: Case studies in MOOC Design, development and implementation (pp. 337–348). New York, NY: Linus Publications. ISBN 13: 978-1-60797-561-8.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, Z. (2004). Attitudes and strategies as predictors of self-directed language learning in an EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 389–411.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaith, G. M., & Yaghi, H. M. (1998). Effect of cooperative learning on the acquisition of second language rules and mechanics. System, 26(2), 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, B., & Johnson, D. (1980). Building positive attitudes by using cooperative learning groups. Foreign Language Annals, 13(1), 39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HSK official website. (2017). Introduction to HSKK. Retrieved from http://www.chinesetest.cn.
   Google Scholar
• Halleck, G. B. (1992). The oral proficiency interview: Discrete point test or a measure of communicative language ability ? Foreign Language Annals, 25(3), 227–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halleck, G. B. (1995). Assessing oral proficiency: A comparison of holistic and objective measures. The Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IELTS website. (2016). IELTS speaking band descriptor. Retrieved from http://www.ielts.org
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of educational research, 44(2), 213–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, C., Wen, X., & Kotenbuetel, C. (2001). Report on the 2000 CLTA articulation project. Journal-Chinese Language Teachers Association, 36(3), 25–60.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (2006). Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 149–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? where do we go from here? Language Teaching, 47(8), 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, H., Haywood, J., & Woodgate, A. (2015). Emerging patterns in MOOCs: Learners, course designs and directions. Tech Trends, 59(1), 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K., & Smith, C. M. (2013). The flipped classroom for professional development: Part I. Benefits and strategies. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(10), 437–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Mehring, J. (2016). Present research on the flipped classroom and potential tools for the EFL classroom. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning. Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, H. G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prefume, Y. E. (2015). Exploring a flipped classroom approach in a Japanese language classroom: A mixed methods study (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/baylor-ir/handle/2104/9569
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2007). Re-thinking-for-speaking and L2 task demands: The Cognition Hypothesis, task classification, and sequencing. In Proceedings of the plenary address at the second international conference on task-based language teaching. Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Shaaban, K., & Ghaith, G. (2005). The theoretical relevance and efficacy of using cooperative learning in the ESL/EFL classroom. TESL Reporter, 38(2), 14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H. H., & Xu, W. (2015). Active Learning: Qualitative inquiries into vocabulary instruction in Chinese L2 classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 48(1), 82–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokouhi, H., & Alishaei, Z. (2009). Proficiency and collaborative learning. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 129–141.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (2009). Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati ( Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 203–215). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, K., Brabander, C. J., & Martens, R. L. (2014). Student-centered and teacher centered learning environment in pre-vocational secondary education: Psychological needs, and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 695–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environment Research, 15, 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Szostek, C. (1994). Assessing the effects of cooperative learning in an honors foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 27(2), 252–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarone, E. (In Ellis, R.(Eds.) (1987). Methodologies for studying variability in second language acquisition, Second Language Acquisition in Context, (pp. 35–40), Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, P. (2016). Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency.. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 133–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. L., & Lantolf, J. P. (2007). A linguistics of communicative activity. Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages, 62, 170–195.
   Google Scholar
• Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tune, J., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 316–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hout-Wolters, B., Simons, R. J., & Volet, S. (2000). Active learning: Self-directed learning and independent work. In Simons, R., van der Linden, J. & Duffy T. (Ed.), New Learning (pp. 21–36). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 34–41). New York, NY: Scientific American Books.
   Google Scholar
• Whong, M. (2013). A linguistic perspective on communicative language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 14(3), 115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. G. (2013). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C., & Tavakoli, P. (2016). New directions and developments in defining, analyzing and measuring l2 speech fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C., & Zhang, C. (2014). Examining the effects of Study Abroad on L2 Chinese development among UK university learners. Newcastle & Northumbria Working Papers in Linguistics, 20: 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Yarbro, J., Arfstrom, K. M., McKnight, K., & McKnight, P. (2014). Extension of a review of flipped learning. Retrieved from http://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/41/Extension%20of%20Flipped%20Learning%20Lit%20Review%20June%202014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar