Developing and validating a questionnaire for evaluating the EFL ‘Total PACKage’: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for English as a Foreign Language (EFL)

References

• ACTFL. (2002). Program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). Retrieved fromhttp://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/CAEP/ACTFLNCATEStandardsRevised713.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (2001). The language awareness of the L2 teacher: Its impact upon pedagogical practice. Language Awareness, 10(2–3), 74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-PCK: Advances in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, L.M. (2008). Using TPACK as framework for understanding effective online teaching. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education international conference 2008 (pp. 5190–5195). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, L.M., & Barnett, J.H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55, 1656–1662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baser, D., Kopcha, T.J., & Ozden, M.Y. (2016). Developing a Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 749–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beavers, A.S., Lounsbury, J.W., Richards, J.K., Huck, S.W., Skolits, G.J., & Esquivel, S.L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 18(6), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S., Yamak, H., Kavak, N., & Guzey, S.S. (2013). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self-efficacy Scale (TPACK-SeS) for pre-service science teachers: Construction, validation, and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, C.N., & Widdowson, H.G. (1987). Language teaching: A scheme for teacher education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1997). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching? TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, C.-S., Chin, C.K., Koh, J.H.-L., & Tan, C.L. (2013). Exploring Singaporean Chinese language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and its relationship to the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 657–666. doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0071-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, C.-S., Koh, J.H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, C.-S., Koh, J.H.-L., Tsai, C.-C., & Tan, L.L.W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57, 1184–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 477–497.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge (Doctoral dissertation). Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Dunteman, G.H. (1989). Principal component analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. A perspective from north American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language Teaching, 35, 1–13. doi:10.1017/S0261444801001720
   Google Scholar
• Golonka, E.M., Bowles, A.R., Frank, V.M., Richardson, D.L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Essex: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, Z. (2009). Is text-to-speech synthesis ready for use in computer-assisted language learning? Speech Communication, 51(10), 906–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, D., Hegelheimer, V., Hubbard, P., Ioannou-Georgiou, S., Kessler, G., & Ware, P. (2008). Technology standards framework document. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, V. (2013). ‘A basic starter pack’: The TESOL Certificate as a course in survival. ELT Journal, 67(2), 163–174. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISTE (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Retrieved fromhttp://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S.-J., & Tsai, M.-F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59, 327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimoyannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55, 1259–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H.G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J.H.-L., & Chai, C.-S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers & Education, 70, 222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J.H.-L., Chai, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Examining technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 563–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaradivelu, B. (2001). Toward a post-method pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W.H., & Hsieh, F.-J. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J.W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology in teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). Surveying Chinese in-service K12 teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35–54. doi: 10.1017/S0958344008000414
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., Handley, Z., & Walter, C. (2012). A systematic review of CALL in English as a second language: Focus on primary and secondary education. Language Teaching, 45(1), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, H., & Bull, B. (1991). The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei, M.S., Meshgi, K., Akita, Y., & Kawahara, T. (2017). Partial and synchronized captioning: A new tool to assist learners in developing second language listening skill. ReCALL, 29(2), 178–199. doi:10.1017/S0958344017000039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montero-Perez, M., Paulussen, H., Macken, L., & Desmet, P. (2014). From input to output: The potential of parallel corpora for CALL. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48(1), 165–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning withword lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL, 20(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Netemeyer, R., Bearden, W., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A., Jones, B., Komorowska, H., & Soghikyan, K. (2007). European portfolio for student teachers of languages: A reflection tool for language teacher education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Satar, H.M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
   Google Scholar
• Seferoglu, G. (2004). A study of alternative teacher certification practices in Turkey. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(2), 152–159.
   Google Scholar
• Seferoglu, G. (2006). Teacher candidates’ reflections on some components of a pre-service English teacher preparation programme in Turkey. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(4), 369–378.
   Google Scholar
• Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: The pedagogy of content/the content of pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 489–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81–96. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinas, V.H., Yilmaz-Ozden, S., Mouza, M., Karchmer-Klein, M., & Glutting, J.J. (2013). Examining domains of technological pedagogical content knowledge using factor analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(4), 339–360.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simina, V., & Hamel, M.J. (2005). CASLA through a social constructivist perspective: WebQuest in project-driven language learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 217–228. doi:10.1017/S0958344005000522
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R.I. (1992). Teaching against the grain: Texts for a pedagogy of possibility. New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 365–398. doi:10.1017/S027226310426301X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, X., Huang, X., Zhou, C., & Chang, M. (2017). A technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) scale for geography teachers in senior high school. Science and Education, 42, 325–341. doi:10.15390/EB.2017.6849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TMoNE. (n.d.). Curriculum for English language teaching. Retrieved fromhttps://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx?islem=1&kno=214
   Google Scholar
• Teo, Y.H., & Ting, B.H. (2010). Singapore education ICT master plans (1997–2014). In C.-S. Chai & Q. Wang (Eds.), ICT for self-directed and collaborative learning (pp. 1–14). Singapore: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A.D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38–64.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59, 134–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCLES (2010). DELTA syllabus specifications. Retrieved fromhttps://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/digitalAssets/116853_delta_syllabus_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N.P., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/ psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Chen, H., Li, S., & Meng, H.M. (2012). Phoneme level articulatory animation in pronunciation training. Speech Communication, 54(7), 845–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, F.R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D.A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 45(3), 197–210. doi:10.1177/0748175612440286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Olphen, M. (2008). TPCK: An integrated framework for educating world language teachers. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 107–128). New York, NY: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education and Routledge.
   Google Scholar