Bringing L2 learners’ learning preferences in the mediating process through computerized dynamic assessment

References

• Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in L2 French (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Fincham, J. M. (1994). Acquisition of procedural skills from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1322–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antón, M. (2003, March). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhoda, I., & Shabani, K. (2016). Response latency as a tool to study L2 Learners’ ZPD, ZAD and ongoing information processing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhoda, I., & Shabani, K. (2017). Enhancing L2 learners’ ZPD modification through computerized-group dynamic assessment of reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. W. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 53–81). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An international approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–115). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Physchology, 24(4), 420–444.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. (2008). What's the point of school?: Rediscovering the heart of education. Richmond: One World Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: LSRC reference, Learning & Skills Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, L. (1990). A critique of the research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 50–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. E. (1988). Don’t accept me as I am. Helping retarded performers excel. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990). Principles and problems in learning potential. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 296–347). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Guthke, J., & Beckmann, J. F. (2000). The learning test concept and its applications in practice. In C. S. Lidz, & J. G. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: prevailing models and applications (pp. 17–69). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (1998). Learning and studying: A research perspective, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, L. (2015). An empirical examination of EFL learners' perceptual learning styles and acceptance of ASR-based computer-assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 881–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H., & Ellis, R. (Eds.). (2005). Implicit and explicit second-language learning [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, E. L. (2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22(4), 217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, T., & Weninger, C. (2017). Cultural learning in the EFL classroom: the role of visuals. ELT Journal, 71(2), 186–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23, 112–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2016). Use of computer technology for English language learning: Do learning styles, gender, and age matter? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1035–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J. R., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In B. Britton, A. Woodward, & M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks (pp. 95–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (1997). Evaluating change and stability in learning styles: A methodological concern. Educational Psychology, 17(1–2), 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper tests. London: Longman
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language testing, 32(3), 337–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63(3), 595–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezler, A. G., & Rezmovic, V. (1981). The learning preference inventory. Journal of Allied Health, 11, 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America’s testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shabani, K. (2012). Dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ reading comprehension processes: A Vygotskian perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 321–328.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Zhang, L. F. (2008). Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 486–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2002). The effects of mediation in computer assisted dynamic assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar