Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners' appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception

References

• Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analyzing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnan, M. (2017). Perceptions of senior-year ELT students for flipped classroom: a materials development course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 204–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allami, H., & Naeimi, A. (2011). A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 385–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsowat, H. (2016). An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: Effects on English language higher-order thinking skills, student engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 108–121.
   Google Scholar
• Amiryousefi, M. (2017). The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners’ L2 speaking, L2 listening, and engagement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–15. doi:10.1080/17501229.2017.1394307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P. & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. New York: Longman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Artz, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basal, A. (2015).The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16 (4), 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. Developing communicative competence in a second language, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Arlington: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working papers in applied linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 43–69). London: Thames Valley University.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, M. (2006). Commentary: Crossing the digital divide: How race, class, and culture matter. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Guidry, K. R., Cubillos, J., & Pusecker, K. (2013). The connection between self-regulated learning and student success in a hybrid course. In Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA. Retrieved from: http://www.mistakengoal.com/docs/Self-regulated_learning_hybrid_course.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. M., Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, T. (2001). Indicators for pragmatic instruction: Some quantitative tools. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 283–300). New York: Camridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2017). Design‐based research: redesign of an English language course using a flipped classroom approach. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 180–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293).
   Google Scholar
• Kang, N. (2015). The comparison between regular and flipped classrooms for EFL Korean adult learners. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 41–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 502–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 52, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• King, W. R., and He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissau, S., McCullough, H., & Pyke, J. G. (2010). Leveling the playing field: The effects of online second language instruction on student willingness to communicate in French. Calico Journal, 27(2), 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 36–59). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. H., Hsiao, C., & Purnomo, S. H. (2014). An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 562–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2017). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 62–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P., & Mercer, J. D. (2015). Depth of processing in L2 learning: Theory, research, and pedagogy. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2013). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Routledge and pedagogy. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, R. B., & Folse, K. S. (2014). Flip It!: Strategies for the ESL classroom. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucke, T. (2014). Using learning analytics to evaluate the effectiveness of the flipped classroom approach. In 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: Engineering the Knowledge Economy: Collaboration, Engagement & Employability (p.1156). School of Engineering & Advanced Technology, Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. E., White, P. J., Khanova, J., & Yuriev, E. (2016). Flipped classroom implementation: a case report of two higher education institutions in the United States and Australia. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 24–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010).Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moranski, K., & Kim, F. (2016). ‘Flipping’ lessons in a multi‐section Spanish course: Implications for assigning explicit grammar instruction outside of the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 830–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, C. J., & Nicholson, A. (2014). Improved student achievement through gamification and the flipped classroom. In ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting, Kansas City, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly 30(1), 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 strategies to teach any subject. PO Box 11071, Des Moines, IA 50336-1071: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behavior in developing countries: A structural equation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, H. (2013). World languages. In J. Bretzman (Ed.), Flipping 2.0: Practical strategies for flipping your class (pp. 265–280). New Berlin, WI: The Bretzman Group
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. C. V., Marek, M., & Yen, L. L. (2012).Promotion of EFL student motivation, confidence, and satisfaction via a learning spiral, peer-scaffolding, and CMC. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 2(3), 54–75.
   Google Scholar