Effect of student team achievement division through WebQuest on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills and their instructors’ perceptions

References

• ACTFL.ORG. (2015). Assigning CEFR ratings to ACTFL assessments. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL. https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/reports/Assigning_CEFR_Ratings_To_ACTFL_Assessments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aditomo, A., Goodyear, A., Bliuc, M., & Ellis, R. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.616584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai, H. (2017). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment. ReCALL, 29(3), 313–334. doi:10.1017/S095834401700012X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsanjani, M., & Faghih, E. (2015). The impact of the WebQuest instruction system on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ writing performance and perception. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(2), 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Awada, G., & Ghaith, G. (2015). Impact of WebQuest and gender on writing achievement in professional business English. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 6(2), 1–27. doi:10.6706/TIESPJ.2014.6.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Awada, G., & Diab, H. (2018, July). Effect of WebQuest media on learners’ intercultural communication debate and motivation. Paper presented at the XIXth International CALL Conference: CALL your Data, Bruges, Belgium. Retrieved from www.call2018.org
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S. (2016). WebQuests as language-learning tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 765–778. doi:10.1080/09588221.2015.1061019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Book excerpt. San Rafael, CA: George Lucas Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/bikowskivithanage.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). Inquiry-based learning for the arts, humanities and social sciences: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Borthwick, K., & Gallagher-Brett, A. (2014). Inspiration, ideas, encouragement: Teacher development and improved use of technology in language teaching through open educational practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 163–183. doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.818560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: Reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296–306. doi:10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97
   Google Scholar
• Dizon, G. (2016). A comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1249–1258. doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1266369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(8), 6–9. http://www.academia.edu/download/50405963/Five_20Rules_20for_20Writing_20a_20Great_20WebQuest.doc
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 617–651. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, C. (2001). Vygotsky’s constructionism, 48–49. In M.Orey (Ed., 2010). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. North Charleston: CreateSpace. http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php/title=Vygotsky%27s_constructivism.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, E., & Knight, A. (2012). Inclusive music teaching strategies for elementary-age children with developmental dyslexia. Music Educators Journal, 99(1), 54–59. doi:10.1177/0027432112452597
   Google Scholar
• Iskeceli-Tunc, S., & Oner, D. (2016). Use of WebQuest design for in-service instructor professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 21(2), 319–347. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-014-9323-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. (2013). The student-centered classroom: Vol 1: Social studies and history. London: Routledge. ISBN 1317919491, 9781317919490
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Putting it into practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., & Akhtar, M. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of cooperative learning method on teaching of English grammar. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 1–16. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1944195134?accountid=27870
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882–904. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgregor, G., & McGill, L. (2005). Digital libraries and information literacy issues within virtual learning environments: An e-learning impasse? Paper presented at the Librarians’ Annual Information Literacy Conference (LILAC), April 4–6, Imperial College, London, UK, available at: http://eprints.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/2334/01/MacgregorMcGill_LILAC2005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mudofir, I. (2017). STAD vs conventional and learning modality towards English fluency learning outcome. International Journal of Learning and Change, 7(4), 228. doi:10.1504/IJLC.2018.10016001
   Google Scholar
• National Council of State Supervisors for Languages & American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2017). NCSSFL-ACTFL can-do statements: Performance indicators for language learners. Retrieved from https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/CanDos/Superior%20Distinguished%20Can-Do_Statements.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, S., Tannenbaum, R., Bridgeman, B., & Cho, Y. (2015). The association between TOEFL iBT® test scores and the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) levels. (Research Memorandum ETS RM–15-06). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-15-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rattanatumma, T., & Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of STAD model and problem-based learning in mathematics learning achievement and problem solving ability. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 194–199.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. (1996). Cooperative learning in middle and secondary schools. The Clearing House, 69(4), 200–204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30189163
   Google Scholar
• Sox, A., & Rubinstein-Ávila, E. (2009). WebQuests for English-language learners: Essential elements for design. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(1), 38–48. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sysoyeva, P. V., & Evstigneevb, M. N. (2014). Foreign language competency and competence in using information and communication technologies. Culture, 20, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Tarim, K., & Akdeniz, F. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on Turkish elementary students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics using TAI and STAD methods. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 77–91. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-007-9088-y
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., & Evans, M. (2014). Guest editorial. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 107–108. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.874101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirado-Morueta, R., Maraver-López, P., & Hernando-Gómez, Á. (2018). Using communities of inquiry online to perform tasks of higher order learning. In Encyclopedia of information science and technology (4th ed.), (pp. 3976–3987). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, I. P. (2007). WebQuest: A collaborative strategy to teach content and language (Vol. 1, pp. 1–15). Granada: University of Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. (2006). Students' perceptions of English learning through EFL WebQuest. In EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 1531–1536). Waynesville, MO: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146–165. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2017/yimwarschauer.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zunal.Com. (2001) WebQuest: Teaching is my Passion. Retrieved from zunal.com/WebQuest.php/w=196118
   Google Scholar