References
- Agree, E. M., King, A. C., Castro, C. M., Wiley, A., & Borzekowski, D. L. (2015). “It’s got to be on this page”: Age and cognitive style in a study of online health information seeking. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(3), e79. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3352
- Alhathli, M. A. E., Masthoff, J. F. M., & Beacham, N. A. (2018). The effects of learners' verbal and visual cognitive styles on instruction selection. In Proceedings of Intelligent Mentoring Systems Workshop Associated with the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2018.
- Angelova, M., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness and language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 167–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.907320
- Azizah, U. A., & Budiman, A. (2018). Challenges in writing academic papers for international publication among Indonesian graduates students. Jeels (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 4(2), 175–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v4i2.405
- Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bannert, M., Sonnenberg, C., Mengelkamp, C., & Pieger, E. (2015). Short-and long-term effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 293–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.038
- Baró‐Solé, X., Guerrero‐Roldan, A. E., Prieto‐Blázquez, J., Rozeva, A., Marinov, O., Kiennert, C., … Garcia‐Alfaro, J. (2018). Integration of an adaptive trust‐based e‐assessment system into virtual learning environments—The TeSLA project experience. Internet Technology Letters, 1(4), e56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/itl2.56
- Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505–518). New York, NY: Springer.
- Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
- Bull, K. S., Shuler, P., Overton, R., Kimball, S., Boykin, C., & Griffin, J. (1999). Processes for developing scaffolding in a computer mediated learning environment. In Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES) (19th, Albuquerque, New Mexico, March 25–27, 1999).
- Chan, C. H., Hsieh, C. W., & Chen, Y. S. (2014). Cognitive styles and the use of electronic journals in a mobile context. Journal of Documentation, 70(6), 997–1014.
- Chen, S. Y., & Chang, L. P. (2016). The influences of cognitive styles on individual learning and collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 458–471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.931242
- Chen, S. Y., Chang, C. H., Yang, T. C., & Wang, J. H. (2018). An investigation of the development of an animated E-book: A gender difference approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 28–36.
- Chen, Y. (2018). Reducing language speaking anxiety among adult EFL learners with interactive holographic learning support system. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 101–110). Springer, Cham.
- Chen, Z. H., Chen, S. Y., & Chien, C. H. (2017). Students’ reactions to different levels of game scenarios: A cognitive style approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 69–77.
- Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2011). Mining learning preferences in web-based instruction: Holists vs. serialists. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 266–277.
- Cox, A. M., Vasconcelos, A. C., & Holdridge, P. (2010). Diversifying assessment through multimedia creation in a non‐technical module: Reflections on the MAIK project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 831–846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903125249
- Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self‐regulated learning in computer‐based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 557–573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00476.x
- Ebadi, S., Weisi, H., Monkaresi, H., & Bahramlou, K. (2018). Exploring lexical inferencing as a vocabulary acquisition strategy through computerized dynamic assessment and static assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 790–817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1451344
- Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
- Ford, N. (1985). Learning styles and strategies of postgraduate students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 65–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.1985.tb00483.x
- Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00173
- Forsyth, C. M., Graesser, A., Olney, A. M., Millis, K., Walker, B., & Cai, Z. (2015, June). Moody agents: Affect and discourse during learning in a serious game. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 135–144). Springer, Cham.
- Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
- Game, A., & Metcalfe, A. (2009). Dialogue and team teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 45–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444354
- Hong, Z.-R., Lin, H., Wang, H.-H., Chen, H.-T., & Yang, K.-K. (2013). Promoting and scaffolding elementary school students’ attitudes toward science and argumentation through a science and society intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1625–1648. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.734935
- Hsieh, C. W., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). A cognitive style perspective to handheld devices: Customization vs. personalization. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i1.2168
- Hsieh, C. W., Jhan, S. N., & Chen, S. Y. (2014). Individual differences and joyful assessment-based learning. In IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 330–335). IEEE.
- Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2005). A student’s introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hyland, K. (2013). Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 180–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.06.003
- Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2011). Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring? Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 467–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01143.x
- Jeske, D., Backhaus, J., & Roßnagel, C. S. (2014). Evaluation and revision of the Study Preference Questionnaire: Creating a user-friendly tool for nontraditional learners and learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 133–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.11.006
- Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of individual differences and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
- Jones, S., Myhill, D., & Bailey, T. (2012). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241–1263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9416-1
- Khaliliaqdam, S. (2014). ZPD, scaffolding and basic speech development in EFL context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 891–897. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.497
- Kılıçkaya, F. (2016). Computer-based grammar instruction in an EFL context: Improving the effectiveness of teaching adverbial clauses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 325–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818563
- Ku, O., Hou, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Incorporating customization and personalization into game-based learning: A cognitive style perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 359–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.040
- McCausland, W. D. (2003). Extended case study: Computer aided assessment and independent learning in macroeconomics. Bristol: University of Bristol.
- Mehl, S., Wallis, S., & Aarts, B. (2016). Language learning at your fingertips: Deploying corpora in mobile teaching apps. In K. P. Corrigan & A. Mearns (Eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora (pp. 211–239). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2013, October). Do points, levels and leaderboards harm intrinsic motivation?: An empirical analysis of common gamification elements. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (pp. 66–73). ACM
- Mora, M. C., Sancho-Bru, J. L., Iserte, J. L., & Sánchez, F. T. (2012). An e-assessment approach for evaluation in engineering overcrowded groups. Computers & Education, 59(2), 732–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.011
- Nicol, D. (2007). Laying a foundation for lifelong learning: Case studies of e‐assessment in large 1st‐year classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 668–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00657.x
- Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 128–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02305.x
- Peterson, E. R., Rayner, S. G., & Armstrong, S. J. (2009). Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning style: Is there really a future? Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 518–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.003
- Refnita, L. (2013). A model of integrated assessment for structure I subject at university level. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 1, 155–164.
- Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (2013). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. London: Routledge.
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Thompson, M. M., & Braude, E. J. (2016). Evaluation of Knowla: An online assessment and learning tool. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(4), 483–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115621923
- Trisna, B. N., Budayasa, I. K., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Students’ metacognitive activities in solving the combinatorics problem: The experience of students with holist-serialist cognitive style. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 947(1), pp. 012072). IOP Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012072
- Wang, J. H., Chang, L. P., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). Effects of cognitive styles on web-based learning: Desktop computers versus mobile devices. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5), 750–769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117727598
- Wang, T. H. (2007). What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e‐learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 171–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00211.x
- Wei, W., & Zheng, Y. (2017). An investigation of integrative and independent listening test tasks in a computerised academic English test. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 864–883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1373131
- Wiggins, G. (2004). Assessment as feedback. New Horizons for Learning, 10(2), 1–8.
- Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Milrad, M., Ke, H. R., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). An innovative concept map approach for improving students’ learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 217–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01167.x
- Wu, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2015). How cognitive styles affect the learning behaviors of online problem-solving based discussion activity: A lag sequential analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), 277–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115571307
- Yang, T. C., Chen, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). The influences of a two-tier test strategy on student learning: A lag sequential analysis approach. Computers & Education, 82, 366–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.021
- Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2019). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882