Exploring EFL learners` developmental errors in academic writing through face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated dynamic assessment

References

• Abbasi, M., & Karimnia, A. (2011). An analysis of grammatical errors among Iranian translation students: Insights from interlanguage theory. European Journal of Social Sciences, 25(4), 525–536.
   Google Scholar
• Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic Assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 659–663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_4.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (4), 465–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/328585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Nofaie, H. (2010). The attitudes of teachers and students towards using Arabic in EFL classrooms in Saudi public schools – A case study. Novitas Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 4(1), 64–95.
   Google Scholar
• Alsagoff, L. (2016). Interpreting error patterns in a longitudinal primary school corpus of writing. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3 (1), 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Tamimi, A. (2006). An investigation of interlingual and intralingual interference in the acquisition of English present tenses by Yemeni learners. (Unpublished MA Thesis) University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, K., Reis-Bergan, M., Adams, A. H., & Saunders, G. (2011). Online tools to promote student collaboration. In D. S. Dunn, J. H. Wilson, J. Freeman, & J. R. Stowell (Eds.), Getting connected: Best practices for technology enhanced teaching and learning in high education (pp. 239–252). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asoodar, M., Marandi, S. S., Vaezi, S., & Desmet, P. (2016). Podcasting in a virtual English for academic purposes course: Learner motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 875–896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.937344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston, G. (2001). Learning with corpora: An overview. In G. Aston (Ed.), Learning with Corpora (pp. 1–45). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
   Google Scholar
• Azabdaftari, B. (2013). An explication of concordance between man’s mental structure and the narrative structure in the light of Vygotsky’s SCT. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Babaii, E., & Ramazani, K. (2017). Reverse transfer: Exploring the effects of foreign language rhetorical patterns on L1 writing performance of Iranian EFL learners. RELC Journal, 5(4), 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216687456
   Google Scholar
• Bahrpeyma, M., & Ostad, O. (2018). Error analysis of composition writing: A case of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 7 (1), 101–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2017.1694
   Google Scholar
• Baten, L., Bouckaert, N., & Yingli, K. (2009). A pilot study on the use of communities in a virtual learning environment. In Thomas, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning (pp.137–157). Hershey, PA: Information Science Research. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch008
   Google Scholar
• Birjandi, P., & Ebadi, S. (2012). Microgenesis in dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ socio-cognitive development via web 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 34–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, J. (2007). Abdullah’s blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 128–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, D. (2007). Second language identities. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Boettcher, J. V. (2007). Ten core principles for designing effective learning environments: Insights from brain research and pedagogical theory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(2), 1–10. Retrieved from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol3/iss3/2.
   Google Scholar
• Brandl, K. (1995). Strong and weak students' preferences for error feedback options and responses. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (2), 194–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Buckwalter, P. (2001). Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study. The Modern Language Journal, 85(3), 380–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlucci, L., & Case, J. (2013). On the necessity of U-shaped learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5 (1), 56–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chanier, T., Pengelly, M., Twidale, M., & Self, J. (1992). BELLOC: "Conceptual modelling in error analysis in computer assisted language learning systems. In M. Swartz Met Yazdani (Eds.), The bridge to international communication: Intelligent tutoring systems for foreign language learning (pp. 125–150). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, NATO ASI Series.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2016). Evaluating language-learning mobile apps for second-language learners. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 9 (2), 39–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0902.03
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. F. E., & Cheng, W. Y. E. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning & Technology, 12 (2), 94–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creme, P., & Lea, M. R. (2003). Writing at university: A guide for students. UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deekens, V. M., Greene, J. F., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2018). Monitoring and depth of strategy use in computer‐based learning environments for science and history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 63–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. Vanpatten., & J. Williams. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of Web Quest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 617–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, K., & Reitzel, A. C. (1988). A relational model for managing second language anxiety. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 437–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3587288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (2009). Repetition, use of L1 and reading aloud as mediational mechanism during collaborative activity at the computer. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22 (4), 323–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903184757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, A., & Bota, J. (2011). Collaborative writing using Google Docs: Insights from writing projects in intermediate French classes. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (p. 6147–6154), Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Heift, T. (2001). Error-specific and individualized feedback in a Web-based language tutoring system: Do they read it? ReCALL, 13(1), 99–109. pp doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400100091X
   Google Scholar
• Heift, T. (2006). Context-sensitive help in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2-3), 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Heift, T., & Nicholson, D. (2000). Theoretical and Practical considerations for web-based intelligent language tutoring systems. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 5th International Conference, Its (pp. 62–354). Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbari, A. A., & Salimi, H. (2015). L3 acquisition of simple and present progressive tenses by Iranian EFL learners. SAGE Open, 5(4),1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015615163
   Google Scholar
• Jabbari, A. A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2012). The role of error types and feedback in Iranian EFL classrooms. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 135–148. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p135.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, M. (2007). Language ideologies and bilingual education: A Korean-American perspective. Language Awareness, 16(2), 114–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.2167/la369.0
   Google Scholar
• Jichun, P. (2015). A corpus-based study on errors in writing committed by Chinese students. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 3(5), 254–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2015.030509
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49 (1), 35–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz, M. H. (1994). Contrastive analysis and error analysis. Tehran: Rahnama Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kozar, O. (2016). Perceptions of webcam use by experienced online teachers and learners: A seeming disconnect between research and practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 779–789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1061021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahuerta, A. (2017). Analysis of accuracy in the writing of EFL students enrolled on CLIL and non-CLIL programs: The impact of grade and gender. The Language Learning Journal, 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1303745
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33(2), 79–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800015329
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ardeshiri, M., & Cummins, J. (2016). A computer-assisted multiliteracies programme as an alternative approach to EFL instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(5), 595–612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1118403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.)., Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp.39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, A. (2011). The role of interlingual and intralingual transfer in learner-centered EFL vocabulary instruction. Arab World English Journal, 2(3), 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Mazloomi, S., & Khabiri, M. (2018). The impact of self-assessment on language learners’ writing skill. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 91–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1214078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty, S. G. (1992). The use of private speech by adult ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 179–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb01098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, M. (1994). Repetition in situated discourse – Exploring its forms and functions. In B. Johnstone (Ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 140–142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J. (1994). A corpus-based online grammar and writing tool for EFL learners: A report on work in progress. In J. Thomas & A. Boulton (Eds.), Input, process and product: Developments in teaching and language corpora. Brno: Masaryk University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, N., & Nallaya, S. (2016). Embedding academic literacies in university program curricula: A case study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(7), 1296–1312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.981150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagata, N., & Swisher, M. V. (1995). A study of consciousness-raising by computer: The effect of metalinguistic feedback on second language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(3), 337. Retrieved September 14, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/80713/. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00803.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667135
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norrick, N. R. (1987). Functions of repetition in conversation. Text- Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 7(3), 245–264.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved April, 2010 from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
   Google Scholar
• Oskoz, A. (2013). Students' dynamic assessment via online chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 513–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i3.513-536
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry; a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 1(3), 261–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. U.S.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2014). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouladian, N., Bagheri, M. S., & Sadighi, F. (2017). An analysis of errors in writing skill of adult Iranian EFL learners preparing for the IELTS. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7 (3), 85–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n3p85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Noroozisiam, E. (2013). The effect of strategies-based instruction on the improvement of EFL learners’ writing quality: A sociocultural approach. Sage Open, 3(2), 215824401349422–215824401349428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013494222
   Google Scholar
• Rashidi, N., & Bahadori Nejad, Z. (2018). An investigation into the effect of dynamic assessment on the EFL learners’ process writing development. SAGE Open, 8(2),1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reishaan, A. K. (2013). The use of tenses in the Iraqi advanced EFL learners' writings: An error analysis. Philology and Cultural Studies, 6(55), 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language earning (pp. 79–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, K. (2009). Collocational differences between L1 and L2: Implications for EFL learners and teachers. TESL Canada Journal, 26(2), 100–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v26i2.417
   Google Scholar
• Salaberry, M. R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1), 5–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200002)13:1;1-K;FT005
   Google Scholar
• Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2018). Toward a taxonomy of errors in Iranian EFL learners’ basic-level Writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwind, C. B. (1995). Error analysis and explanation in knowledge based language tutoring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(4), 295–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822950080402
   Google Scholar
• Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M. H. (2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 557–573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00504.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, P., & Coffin, C. (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 55–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2004). Computer mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(03), 365–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310426301X
   Google Scholar
• Soleimani, M., Modirkhamene, S., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Peer-mediated vs. individual writing: Measuring fluency, complexity, and accuracy in writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 86–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1043915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development. A Vygotskian approach. Educational Psychologist, 31(3-4), 191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/136216800125087
   Google Scholar
• Taghavi, M. (2012). Error analysis in composition of Iranian lower intermediate students. ERIC, 14, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. (2008). Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thouësny, S., & Bradley, L. (2014). Applying dynamic assessment principles to online peer revisions in written English for specific purposes. In S. Jager, L. Bradley, E. J. Meima, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL Design: Principles and Practice. Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference (pp. 368–373), Groningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Authenticity in online dynamic assessment: Iranian EFL Learners Perspectives. CALL-EJ, 20(2), 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Van Noord, G. (1997). An efficient implementation of the head-corner parser. Computational Linguistics, 23(3), 425–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York; Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Wagoner, B. (2009). The experimental methodology of constructive microgenesis. In: J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, N. Chaudhary, & M. Lyra (Eds.), Handbook of dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 99–121). New York: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 321–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus: A new approach to language teaching. UK: Collins Cobuild.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (1998). Concordances in the classroom without a computer: Assembling and exploiting concordances of common words. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 44–66). Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, N. V., & Miller, J. S. (2014). Perspectives on Argument. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. Y., Wu, H. S., Chen, I. S., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Exploring the critical influential factors of creativity for college students: A multiple criteria decision-making approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, Y., & Yuksel, D. (2011). Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A First exposure study. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 457–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zobl, H. (1980). Developmental and transfer errors: Their common bases and (possibly) differential effects on subsequent learning. TESOL Quarterly, 14(4), 279–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3586235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar