1,357
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Designing an authoring system of robots and IoT-based toys for EFL teaching and learning

, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2017). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. VT″T Technical report, 2002.
  • Adamides, G., Christou, G., Katsanos, C., Xenos, M., & Hadzilacos, T. (2015). Usability guidelines for the design of robot teleoperation: A taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(2), 256–262. doi:10.1109/THMS.2014.2371048
  • Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2015). The impact of social robotics on L2 learners’ anxiety and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(4), 523–535. doi:10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y
  • Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813
  • Bakker, A., & Van Eerde, D. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: Methodology and methods in mathematics education (pp. 429–466). New York: Springer.
  • Belpaeme, T., Vogt, P., van den Berghe, R., Bergmann, K., Göksun, T., de Haas, M., … Pandey, A. K. (2018). Guidelines for designing social robots as second language tutors. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 325–341. doi:10.1007/s12369-018-0467-6
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer‐assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741–753. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x
  • Cheng, Y.-W., Sun, P.-C., & Chen, N.-S. (2018). The essential applications of educational robot: Requirement analysis from the perspectives of experts, researchers and instructors. Computers & Education, 126, 399–416. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.020
  • Collective, D.-B R. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
  • Crompton, H., Gregory, K., & Burke, D. (2018). Humanoid robots supporting children’s learning in an early childhood setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 911–927. doi:10.1111/bjet.12654
  • Dagnino, F. M., Dimitriadis, Y. A., Pozzi, F., Asensio‐Pérez, J. I., & Rubia‐Avi, B. (2018). Exploring teachers’ needs and the existing barriers to the adoption of Learning Design methods and tools: A literature survey. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 998–1013. doi:10.1111/bjet.12695
  • Getenet, S. (2019). Using design-based research to bring partnership between researchers and practitioners. Educational Research, 61(4), 482–494. doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1677168
  • Han, J. (2012). Emerging technologies: Robot assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 1–9.
  • Inkster, M., Wellsby, M., Lloyd, E., & Pexman, P. M. (2016). Development of embodied word meanings: Sensorimotor effects in children’s lexical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 317. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00317
  • Kanero, J., Geçkin, V., Oranç, C., Mamus, E., Küntay, A. C., & Göksun, T. (2018). Social robots for early language learning: Current evidence and future directions. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 146–151. doi:10.1111/cdep.12277
  • Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T. (2015). Comparing robot embodiments in a guided discovery learning interaction with children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(2), 293–308. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0277-4
  • Lee, S., Noh, H., Lee, J., Lee, K., Lee, G. G., Sagong, S., & Kim, M. (2011). On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning. ReCALL, 23(1), 25–58. doi:10.1017/S0958344010000273
  • McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97–100. doi:10.3102/0013189X12463781
  • Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 48(7), 788–804. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. Design Research, 153, 152–169.
  • Öttl, B., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2017). Forming associations between language and sensorimotor traces during novel word learning. Language and Cognition, 9(1), 156–171. doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.5
  • Standard, I. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (vdts)–part 11: Guidance on usability. ISO Standard 9241-11: 1998. International Organization for Standardization.
  • Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Vanderlinde, R., & Valcke, M. (2016). Developing educational materials about risks on social network sites: A design based research approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 459–480. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9415-4
  • Vogt, P., De Haas, M., De Jong, C., Baxter, P., & Krahmer, E. (2017). Child-robot interactions for second language tutoring to preschool children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 73. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00073
  • Vogt, P., van den Berghe, R., de Haas, M., Hoffman, L., Kanero, J., Mamus, E., … García, D. H. (2019). Second language tutoring using social robots: A large-scale study. Paper presented at the 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). doi:10.1109/HRI.2019.8673077
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. Revised and expanded by A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
  • Weiss, A., Bernhaupt, R., & Tscheligi, M. (2011). The USUS evaluation framework for user-centered HRI. New Frontiers in Human–Robot Interaction, 2, 89–110.
  • Xue, J., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Pei, X. (2015). The linguistic context effects on the processing of body–object interaction words: An ERP study on second language learners. Brain Research, 1613, 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.050

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.