Using learning analytics to understand collective attention in language MOOCs

References

• Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Self-directed learning readiness of Language MOOC learners. In Proceedings of EMOOCs 2019: Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks (pp. 1–7). Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2356/research_short1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chik, A. (2014). Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and community. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chik, A. (2018). Learning a language for free: Space and autonomy in adult foreign language learning. In G. Murray & T. Lamb (Eds.) Space, place, and autonomy in language learning (pp. 56–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colpaert, J. (2015). Reflections on present and future: Towards an ontological approach to LMOOCs. In E. Martín-Monje & E. Bárcena (Eds.) Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 161–172). Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
   Google Scholar
• Colpaert, J. (2016). Big content in an educational engineering approach. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 7(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, T. (2011). Learning analytics: Definitions, processes and potential. Learning, 1–22. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.456.7092.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209–224. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gelan, A., Fastré, G., Verjans, M., Martin, N., Janssenswillen, G., Creemers, M., … Thomas, M. (2018). Affordances and limitations of learning analytics for computer-assisted language learning: A case study of the VITAL project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 294–226. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1418382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCs. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Riding the digital wilds: Learner autonomy and informal language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 8–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori, E. B., Zhang, J., Galván-Fernández, C., & de Asís Fernández-Navarro, F. (2018). Learner support in MOOCs: Identifying variables linked to completion. Computers & Education, 122, 153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, C. (2008a). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (ed.) Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, C. (2008b). Age and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 35–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. (2013). Emerging student patterns in MOOCs: A (Revised) graphical view. Retrieved from http://mfeldstein.com/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocs-a-revised-graphical-view
   Google Scholar
• Izumi, S. (2002). Output, Input Enhancement, and the Noticing Hypothesis: An Experimental Study on ESL Relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541–577. doi:10.1017/S0272263102004023
   Google Scholar
• Jitpaisarnwattana, N., Reinders, H., & Darasawang, P. (2019). Language MOOCs: An Expanding Field. Technology in Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 21–32. doi:10.29140/tltl.v1n1.142
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (2011). Students, the net generation, and digital natives: Accounting for educational change. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16 (3), 341–358. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D. (2009). Modeling best practices in web-based academic development. In D. Roisin & M. Fiona (Eds.), Applied e-learning and e-teaching in higher education (pp. 35–55). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, D., Ng, A., Chuong, D., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses. Educause Review, 48(3), 62–63. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/retention-and-intention-massive-open-online-courses-depth-0
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of language, (pp. 45–77). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 557–584. doi:10.1017/S0272263100004046
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., Taylor, S. E., & Etherton, J. L. (1996). Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 620–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P.A., Watson, W.R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Adult MOOC learners as self-directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning, 21(2), 1–18. doi:10.24059/olj.vi2.889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Long, P., Siemens, G., Conole, G., & Gasevic, D. (2011). Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK11). Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK11), Banff. New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., Morales, N., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2018). Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 179–196. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Monje, E., Castrillo, M.D., & Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2018). Understanding online interaction in language MOOCs through learning analytics. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 251–272. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1378237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B. (1990). “Conscious" versus "unconscious" learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 617–631. doi:10.2307/3587111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocanu, D., Rossi, L., Zhang, Q., Karsai, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Computers in Human Behavior , 51, 1198–1204. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 75–91). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, K., & Bax, S. (Eds). (2017). Beyond the language classroom: Researching MOOCs and other innovations. Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219–235. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, H. (2018). Learning analytics for language learning and teaching. The JALT CALL Journal, 14(1), 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (2008). Reflections. In C. Griffiths (Ed.) Lessons from good language learners (pp. 10–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd, (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2010, December 2–4). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J.W. Sew, T. Suthiwan, & I. Walker, (Eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010 (pp. 721–737). Singapore: National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, K., Bach, M., Qin, N., Liu, A., Hussen, H., Lee, J.Y., & Kadel, R. (2017). Inferring student success predictors for CS1301x online course at Georgia Tech. Poster session presented at the American Society of Engineering Education STEM Education Expo, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, P., Huang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Deng, S., & Wu, Y. (2015). A geometric representation of collective attention flows. PLoS One, 10(9), e0136243. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. Computers, Communications and the Public Interest, 72, 37.
   Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14(2), 103–135. doi:10.1191/026765898674803209
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, S., Tsao, Y., Yu, L., Chan, C., & Lai, K. R. (2016). Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 8–11. doi:10.1186/s41039-016-0033-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, F., & Huberman, B. A. (2007). Novelty and collective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17599–17601. 10.2139/ssrn.989672.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., & Zhang, J. (2013). The decentralized flow structure of clickstreams on the web. The European Physical Journal B, 86(1), 1–11. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2013-40132-2
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L., Zhang, J., & Zhao, M. (2014). The metabolism and growth of web forums. PloS One., 9(8), e102646. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, S. (2018). English learning with Web 2.0 – An investigation into Chinese undergraduates’ technology (non)use and perspectives. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Guo, L. (2010). Scaling behaviors of food webs as energy transportation networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 264(3), 760–770. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Lou, X., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2019). Modeling collective attention in online and flexible learning environments. Distance Education, 40(2), 278–301. doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1600368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar