References
- AbuSeillek, A. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners' achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231–239.
- Aloraini, N. (2018). Investigating Instagram as an EFL learning tool. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (4), 174–184. doi:10.24093/awej/call4.13
- An, Y. J., & Williams, K. (2010). Teaching with Web 2.0 technologies: Benefits, barriers and lessons learned. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(3), 41–48.
- Bani-Hani, N., Al-Sobh, M., & Abu-Melhim, A. (2014). Utilizing Facebook groups in teaching writing: Jordanian EFL students' perceptions and attitudes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 27–34. doi:10.5539/ijel.v4n5p27
- Bione, T., & Cardoso, W. (2020). Synthetic voices in the foreign language context. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 169–186.
- Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J., & Shen, R. (2009). Microblogging for language learning: Using Twitter to train communicative and cultural competence. In M. Spaniol, Q. Li, R. Klamma, & R. Lau (Eds.), Advances in web based learning-ICWL 2009 (pp. 78–87). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Castrillo, D. (2013). Learners' attitudes toward collaborative writing in e-learning classes: A Twitter project for German as a foreign language. Revista Española De Linguistica Aplicada, 26, 127–138.
- Cerdà, F. L., & Planas, N. C. (2011). Facebook's potential for collaborative e-learning. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 8(2), 197–210.
- Chapelle, C. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741–753. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x
- Cheng, H. (2012). Applying twitter to EFL reading and writing in a Taiwanese college setting (Doctoral dissertation) (Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global).
- Ekoc, A. (2014). Facebook groups as a supporting tool for language classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 18–26.
- Gamble, C., & Wilkins, M. (2014). Student attitudes and perceptions of using Facebook for language learning. Dimension, 3, 49–72.
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2015). The evolving roles of language teachers: Trained coders, local researchers, global citizens. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 10–22.
- Hattem, D. (2013). The practice of microblogging. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 38–70.
- Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist-learning environments. Instructional Design Theories and Models, 2, 215–239.
- Jones, A. (2015). Social media for informal minority language learning: Exploring Welsh learners' practices. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015(1), 7, 1–9. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/jime.ak/. doi:10.5334/jime.ak
- Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
- Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners' perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3), 281–297. doi:10.1017/S0958344014000111
- Li, J., Snow, C., Jiang, J., & Edward, N. (2015). Technology use and self-perceptions of English language skills among urban adolescents. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 450–478. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.881387
- Mitchell, K. (2012). A social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (Calico), 29(3), 471–493. doi:10.11139/cj.29.3.471-493
- Newgarden, K. (2009). Annotated bibliography-Twitter, social networking, and communities of practice. TESL-EJ, 13(2), 2–13. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume13/ej50/ej50int/.
- Parmaxi, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2017). Web 2.0 in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: A research synthesis and implications for instructional design and educational practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 704–716. doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1172243
- Parmaxi, A., Zaphiris, P., & Ioannou, A. (2016). Enacting artifact-based activities for social technologies in language learning using a design-based research approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 556–567. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.072
- Reese, H. W. (2011). The learning-by-doing principle. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 17(1), 1–19. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bdb/17/1/1.pdf. doi:10.1037/h0100597
- Roblyer, M. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Twitter as a formal and informal language learning tool: From potential to evidence. In F. Rosell-Aguilar, T. Beaven, & M. Fuertes Gutierrez (Eds.), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: Integrating informal learning into formal language education (pp. 99–106). Voillans: Research-publishing.net.
- Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.
- Venkatesh, V., Rabah, J., Fusaro, M., Couture, A., Varela, W., & Alexander, K. (2016). Factors impacting university instructors’ and students’ perceptions of course effectiveness and technology integration in the age of Web 2.0. McGill Journal of Education, 51(1), 533–561. doi:10.7202/1037358ar
- Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us?. Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO), 29, 412–430.
- Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2014). The effect of target language use in social media on intermediate-level Chinese language learners' writing performance. Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO), 31, 78–102.
- Zheng, B., Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Social media in the writing classroom and beyond. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–5). doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0555