1,569
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of an automatic speech recognition system with peer feedback on pronunciation instruction for adults

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Baker, A. A., & Burri, M. (2016). Feedback on second language pronunciation: A case study of EAP teachers' beliefs and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(6), 1–19. doi:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n6.1
  • Benzies, Y. J. C. (2013). Spanish EFL university students’ views on the teaching of pronunciation: A survey-based study. Language, 5, 41–49.
  • Blanchard, N., Brady, M., Olney, A. M., Glaus, M., Sun, X., Nystrand, M., … D’Mello, S. (2015). A study of automatic speech recognition in noisy classroom environments for automated dialog analysis. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 23–33). Cham: Springer.
  • Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. ELT Journal, 12(7), 1–45.
  • Breitkreutz, J., Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2001). Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 19(1), 51–61. doi:10.18806/tesl.v19i1.919
  • Brett, D. (2004). Computer generated feedback on vowel production by learners of English as a second language. ReCALL, 16(1), 103–113.
  • Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
  • Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618–1627.
  • Couper, G. (2017). Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching: Teachers' concerns and issues. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 820–843.
  • Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. doi:10.1111/modl.12185
  • Cucchiarini, C., Neri, A., & Strik, H. (2009). Oral proficiency training in Dutch L2: The contribution of ASR-based corrective feedback. Speech Communication, 51(10), 853–863. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2009.03.003
  • Daniels, P., & Iwago, K. (2017). The suitability of cloud-based speech recognition engines for language learning. JALT CALL Journal, 13(3), 229–239.
  • Edalatishams, I. (2017). Non-native speech and recognition accuracy of two ASR applications: Dragon and Dictation. Paper presented at the meeting of Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Elimat, A. K., & AbuSeileek, A. F. (2014). Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation. The JALT CALL Journal, 10(1), 21–47. doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v10n1.166
  • Elliott, A. R. (1995). Foreign language phonology: Field independence, attitude, and the success of formal instruction in Spanish pronunciation. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 530–542.
  • Garcia, C., Kolat, M., & Morgan, T. A. (2018). Self-correction of second-language pronunciation via online, real-time, visual feedback. Proceedings of Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 5, 54–56.
  • Gilakjani, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2011). Why is pronunciation so difficult to learn? English Language Teaching, 4(3), 74–83. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n3p74
  • Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hew, S. H., & Ohki, M. (2013). Effect of animated graphic annotations and immediate visual feedback in aiding Japanese pronunciation learning: A comparative study. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 397–419. doi:10.1558/cj.v21i2.397-419
  • Hincks, R. (2003). Speech technologies for pronunciation feedback and evaluation. ReCALL, 15(1), 3–20.
  • Hincks, R. (2015). Technology and leaning pronunciation. In M. Reed & J. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 505–519). Malden, MA: Wiley.
  • Hosoda, M., Nguyen, L. T., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (2012). The effect of Hispanic accents on employment decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(4), 347–364. doi:10.1108/02683941211220162
  • Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121–130.
  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817–832. doi:10.1121/1.4926561
  • Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366. doi:10.1093/applin/amu040
  • Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 184–202.
  • Levis, J., & Suvorov, R. (2014). Automated speech recognition. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0066/asset/wbeal0066.pdf?v=1&t=htq1z7hp&s=139a3d9f48261a7218270113d3833da39a187e74
  • Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2014). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French/y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25. doi:10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962
  • Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2017). Mobilizing instruction in a second-language context: Learners’ perceptions of two speech technologies. Languages, 2(3), 11–32.
  • Liu, M., Han, M., Chen, Z., Mo, Y., Chen, X., & Liu, X. (2017). Improving English pronunciation via automatic speech recognition technology. In 2017 international symposium on educational technology (pp. 224–228).
  • Liu, S.-C., & Hung, P.-Y. (2016). Teaching pronunciation with computer assisted pronunciation instruction in a technological university. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 1939–1943. doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.040902.
  • Loukina, A., Davis, L., & Xi, X. (2017). Automated assessment of pronunciation in spontaneous speech. In Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp. 153–171). Routledge.
  • Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Center for Instructional Innovation, University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
  • McCrocklin, S. M. (2016). Pronunciation learner autonomy: The potential of automatic speech recognition. System, 57, 25–42.
  • McCrocklin, S. (2019a). ASR-based dictation practice for second language pronunciation improvement. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(1), 98–118.
  • McCrocklin, S. (2019b). Learners' feedback regarding ASR-based dictation practice for pronunciation learning. CALICO Journal, 36(2), 119–137.
  • McCrocklin, S., Humaidan, A., & Edalatishams, E. (2019). ASR dictation program accuracy: Have current programs improved. In Proceedings of the 10th pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference (pp. 191–200).
  • Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 481–520.
  • Morley, J. (1998). Trippingly on the tongue. ESL Magazine, 1(1), 20–23.
  • Mroz, A. P. (2018). Noticing gaps in intelligibility through Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR): Impact on accuracy and proficiency. Paper presented at 2018 Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO) Conference, Urbana, IL, United States.
  • Nakazawa, K. (2012). The effectiveness of focused attention on pronunciation and intonation training in tertiary Japanese language education on learners' confidence: Preliminary report on training workshops and a supplementary computer program. The International Journal of Learning, 18(4), 181–192.
  • Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2006). ASR-based corrective feedback on pronunciation: Does it really work? In Proceedings of international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 1982–1985). Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2002). Feedback in computer assisted pronunciation training: Technology push or demand pull? In Proceedings of international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 103–115).
  • Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393–408. doi:10.1080/09588220802447651
  • Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173–192.
  • Offerman, H. M., & Olson, D. J. (2016). Visual feedback and second language segmental production: The generalizability of pronunciation gains. System, 59, 45–60.
  • Patten, I., & Edmonds, L. A. (2015). Effect of training Japanese L1 speakers in the production of American English/r/using spectrographic visual feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 241–259. doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.839570
  • Quintana-Lara, M. (2014). Effect of Acoustic Spectrographic Instruction on production of English/i/and/I/by Spanish pre-service English teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 207–227.
  • Saito, K. (2011). Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in native-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: An instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20(1), 45–59.
  • Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of/ɹ/by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633.
  • Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. doi:10.1093/applin/amu076
  • Wallace, L. (2016). Using Google web speech as a springboard for identifying personal pronunciation problems. In J. Levis, H. Le, I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference (pp. 180–186). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
  • Wang, Y. H., & Young, S. C. (2015). Effectiveness of feedback for enhancing English pronunciation in an ASR‐based CALL system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 493–504. doi:10.1111/jcal.12079
  • Young, V., & Mihailidis, A. (2010). Difficulties in automatic speech recognition of dysarthric speakers and implications for speech-based applications used by the elderly: A literature review. Assistive Technology, 22(2), 99–112. doi:10.1080/10400435.2010.483646
  • Zhang, F., & Yin, P. (2009). A study of pronunciation problems of English learners in China. Asian Social Science, 5(6), 141–146. doi:10.5539/ass.v5n6p141

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.