The effect of Google Expeditions virtual reality on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and oral proficiency

References

• Alizadeh, M. (2019). Virtual reality in the language classroom: Theory and practice. CALL-EJ, 20(3), 21–30. http://callej.org/journal/20-3/Alizadeh2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Awada, G., & Diab, H. B. (2018). The effect of Google Earth and Wiki models on oral presentation skills of university EFL learners. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(1), 36–46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1169829.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 447–465. doi:10.1017/S0272263197004026
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, E., & Reinders, H. (2018). Augmented and virtual reality in the language classroom: Practical ideas. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 33–53. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1186392.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25–37. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. K., & Wei, W. (2019). Willingness to communicate from an English as an international language (EIL) perspective: The case Macau. System, 87, 102149. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.102149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 459–480. doi:10.2307/3586980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. C. (2020). The effects of pre-task planning on EFL learners' oral performance in a 3D multi-user virtual environment. ReCALL, 32(3), 1–18. doi:10.1017/S0958344020000026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (2016). The effects of virtual reality learning environment on student cognitive and linguistic development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 637–646. doi:10.1007/s40299-016-0293-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Smith, T. J., York, C. S., & Mayall, H. J. (2020). Google Earth Virtual Reality and expository writing for young English learners from a funds of knowledge perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 1–25. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1544151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). A case study of immersive virtual field trips in an elementary classroom: Students’ learning experience and teacher-student interaction behaviors. Computers & Education, 140. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. (2019). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dakowska, M. (2007). Teaching English as a foreign language: A guide for professionals. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubovi, I., Levy, S. T., & Dagan, E. (2017). Now I know how! The learning process of medication administration among nursing students with non-immersive desktop virtual reality simulation. Computers & Education, 113, 16–27. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, O., & Balter, O. (2007). Pronunciation feedback from real and virtual language teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 235–262. doi:10.1080/09588220701489507
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Garcia, A., & Fonseca-Mora, M. C. (2019). EFL learners' speaking proficiency andits connection to emotional understanding, willingness to communicate and musicalexperience. Language Teaching Research. doi:10.1177/1362168819891868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschi, K., Lee, R. M., Zanakis, S. H., & Hinds, D. (2009). Engaging group e-learning in virtual worlds. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 73–100. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadelha, R. (2018). Revolutionizing education: The promise of virtual reality. Childhood Education, 94(1), 40–43. doi:10.1080/00094056.2018.1420362
   Google Scholar
• Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non-English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 197–212. doi:10.1177/0261927X12438538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen, T., & Horwitz, E. K. (2002). Language learning and perfectionism: Anxious and non-anxious language learners' reactions to their own oral performance. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 562–570. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamouda, A. (2013). An exploration of causes of Saudi students' reluctance to participate in the English language classroom. International Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 17–34. http://free-journal.umm.ac.id/files/file/2652-10348-2-PB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. C., & Gutworth, M. B. (2020). A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs for social skill development. Computers & Education, 144. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. E., & Halpern, D. (2015). Can virtual museums motivate students? Toward a constructivist learning approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 776–788. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9563-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428478.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. doi:10.1111/flan.12318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. doi:10.1080/09588220903467335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180. doi:10.1002/tesq.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 605–624. doi:10.1017/S0272263117000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207–218. doi:10.1111/bjet.12580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurk, M. (2019). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in second life: The case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1677722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. (2017). Autonomous language learning with technology: Beyond the classroom. London: Bloomsbury. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509.
   Google Scholar
• Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., & Park, C. S. (2015). A social virtual reality based construction safety education system for experiential learning. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79, 487–506. doi:10.1007/s10846-014-0112-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. A., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2019). EFL students' views of willingness to communicate in the extramular digital context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 692–712. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2020). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners' willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Willingness to communicate in digital and non-digital EFL contexts: Scale development and psychometric testing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 692–712. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1588330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2019). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 813–833. doi:10.1177/1362168819831408
   Google Scholar
• Leese, M. (2009). Out of class-out of mind? The use of a virtual learning environment to encourage student engagement in out of class activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 70–77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. (2013). A history of psycholinguistics: The pre-Chomskyan era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, G. S. (2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes about target language use, first language use, and anxiety: Report of a questionnaire study. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 343–364. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2002). Impact of 3D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 43–57. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology the better? A comparison of teacher-student interaction in high and low technology use elementary EFL classrooms in China. System, 84, 24–40. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T. J., & Lan, Y. J. (2015). Language learning in virtual reality environments: Past, present, and future. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 486–497. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A., Rogerson, S., & Stead, G. (2017). Imagining the potential for using virtual reality technologies in language learning. In M. Carrier, R. M. Damerow, & K. M. Bailey (Eds.), Digital language learning and teaching: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 222–234). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311. doi:10.1017/S0958344019000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135–142. doi:10.1080/08824099409359951
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388. doi:10.1017/S0272263101003035
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association Convention, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Nobrega, F. A., & Rozenfeld, C. C. (2019). Virtual reality in the teaching FLE in a Brazilian public school. Languages, 4(2), 36. doi:10.3390/languages4020036
   Google Scholar
• Omaggio, A. (1986). Teaching language in context: Proficiency oriented instruction. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. M. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. E. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System, 82, 161–173. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2010). Massively multiplayer online role-playing games as arenas for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(5), 429–439. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2016). The use of massively multiplayer online role-playing games in CALL: An analysis of research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(7), 1181–1194. doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1197949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piniel, K., & Albert, A. (2018). Advanced learners' foreign language-related emotions across the four skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 127–147. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.27163.05921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, P. L., Zheng, J., Guo, Z., & Li, J. (2018). Speed reading on virtual reality and augmented reality. Computers & Education, 125, 240–245. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeffler, M., Gernert, J. L., Neumayer, M., Westphal, S., & Herre, J. (2015). On the validity of virtual reality based auditory experiments: A case study about ratings of the overall listening experience. Virtual Reality, 19(3-4), 181–200. doi:10.1007/s10055-015-0270-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, X., & Byfield, L. (2018). Promoting English learners' willingness to communicate in content-area classrooms. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91(6), 250–257. doi:10.1080/00098655.2018.1541856
   Google Scholar
• Sydorenko, T., Smits, T. F. H., Evanini, K., & Ramanarayanan, V. (2019). Simulated speaking environments for language learning: Insights from three cases. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1-2), 17–48. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1466811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, H., & Kuzborska, I. (2018). Dynamics of factors underlying willingness to communicate in a second language. The Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 481–500. doi:10.1080/09571736.2018.1435709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar, S. (2005). Why keep Silent? The classroom participation experiences of non-native-English-speaking students. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(3-4), 284–293. doi:10.1080/14708470508668902
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. P., Lan, Y. J., Tseng, W. T., Lin, Y. T., & Gupta, K. C. (2019). On the effects of 3D virtual worlds in language learning – A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning.doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1598444
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., An, N., & Wright, C. (2018). Enhancing beginner learners' oral proficiency in a flipped Chinese foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 490–521. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1417872
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Chen, Y., & Ryder, L. H. (2019). Effects of using mobile-based virtual reality on Chinese L2 students’ oral proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1604551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, H. C., & Lai, W. Y. (2019). Speaking progress and negotiation processes in synchronous online tutoring. System, 81, 179–191. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y. L., & Lan, Y. J. (2018). Fostering student autonomy in English learning through creations in a 3D virtual world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 693–708. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9566-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaremba, A. J. (2006). Speaking professionally. Canada: Thompson South-Western.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrinabadi, N., & Abdi, R. (2011). Willingness to communicate and language learning orientations in Iranian EFL context. International Education Studies, 4(4), 206–214. doi:10.5539/ies.v4n4p206.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J. F. (2019). One situation doesn't fit all: Variability and stability of state willingness to communicate in a Chinese college English classroom. Language Teaching Research. doi:10.1177/1362168819891330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar