Digital flashcards vs. wordlists for learning technical vocabulary

References

• Altıner, C. (2011). Integrating a Computer-Based Flashcard Program into Academic Vocabulary Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Iowa State University. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=etd.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft, R. J., Cvitkovic, R., & Praver, M. (2018). Digital flashcard L2 vocabulary learning out-performs traditional flashcards at lower proficiency levels: A mixed-methods study of 139 Japanese university students. The EuroCALL Review, 26(1), 14–28. doi:10.4995/eurocall.2018.7881
   Google Scholar
• Azabdaftari, B., & Mozaheb, M. A. (2012). Comparing vocabulary learning of EFL learners by using two different strategies: Mobile learning vs. flashcards. The EuroCALL Review, 20(2), 47–59. doi:10.4995/eurocall.2012.11377
   Google Scholar
• Başoğlu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students' English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(3), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, C. W. (2015). Analysis the effectiveness of three online vocabulary flashcard websites on L2 learners' level of lexical knowledge. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 111–121. doi:10.5539/elt.v8n5p111
   Google Scholar
• Chung, T.M., & Nation, P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialised texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(2), 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, T.M., & Nation, P. (2004). Identifying technical vocabulary. System, 32(2), 251–263. doi:10.1016/j.system.2003.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A., & Demecheleer, M. (2018). Investigating the technical vocabulary of Plumbing. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 84–97. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A., Demecheleer, M., & McLaughlin, E. (2016). The technical vocabulary of carpentry: Loads, lists and bearings. TESOLANZ Journal, 24, 38–71. doi:10.1007/s40841-015-0002-3.
   Google Scholar
• Dizon, G. (2016). Quizlet in the EFL classroom: Enhancing academic vocabulary acquisition of Japanese university students. Teaching English with Technology, 16(2), 40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Dizon, G., & Tang, D. (2017). Comparing the efficacy of digital flashcards versus paper flashcards to improve receptive and productive L2 vocabulary. The EuroCALL Review, 25(1), 3–15. doi:10.4995/eurocall.2017.6964
   Google Scholar
• Dodigovic, M. (2013). Vocabulary learning with electronic flashcards: Teacher design vs. student design. Voices in Asia Journal, 1(1), 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Elgort, I., & Nation, P. (2010). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Familiar answers to new questions. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising 'learning' in applied linguistics (pp. 89–104). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3–17. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 198–208. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL, 20(2), 141–161. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000323
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T., Al-Qarni, I., & Meara, P. (2008). Intensive vocabulary learning: A case study. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 239–248. doi:10.1080/09571730802390759
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, L. (2015). Corpus-based research and pedagogy in EAP: From lexis to genre. Language Teaching, 48(1), 99–116. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Contextualized vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin-Jones, R., & Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). From memory palaces to spacing algorithms: Approaches to second-language vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Fletcher, B. (2012). The use of flashcards in an introduction to psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 39(3), 199–202. doi:10.1177/0098628312450436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T., & Bailey, B. (2010). Digital flashcard tools. TechTrends, 54(4), 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Groot, P. J. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 56–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschel, R., & Fritz, E. (2013). Learning vocabulary: CALL program versus vocabulary notebook. System, 41(3), 639–653. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.016
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23, 403–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıçkaya, F., & Krajka, J. (2010). Comparative usefulness of online and traditional vocabulary learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(2), 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning & Technology, 3(2), 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., Meara, P., & Nation, P. (2005). Ten best ideas for teaching vocabulary. The Language Teacher, 29(7), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2019). Informal digital learning of English and second language vocabulary outcomes: Can quantity conquer quality? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 767–778. doi:10.1111/bjet.12599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878–919. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, S., Hogg, N., & Rush, T. W. (2013). Vocabulary learning through an online computerized flashcard site. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(1), 79–98. doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v9n1.149
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. S., & Nemati, A. (2017). The comparative study of the Iranian EFL learners vocabulary learning through two different formats: Paper & pencil vs. software. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 6(1), 113–131.
   Google Scholar
• Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL, 20(1), 3–20. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000219
   Google Scholar
• Nakata, T. (2011). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 17–38. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nikoopour, J., & Kazemi, A. (2014). Vocabulary learning through digitized & non-digitized flashcards delivery. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(1), 1366–1373.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg, A. (2011). Comparison of the effectiveness of a CALL-based approach and a card-based approach to vocabulary acquisition and retention. Calico Journal, 29(1), 118–144. doi:10.11139/cj.29.1.118-144
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. E. (2001). Korean EFL learners’ vocabulary learning strategies. English Teaching, 56(4), 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, P. (2018). How advanced students approach intentional vocabulary study. The Language Learning Journal, 46(3), 293–310. doi:10.1080/09571736.2015.1078398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, K., Krebs, B., & Grove, R. (2019). Flip, slide, or swipe? Learning outcomes from paper, computer, and tablet flashcards. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(3), 461–482. doi:10.1007/s10758-017-9345-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanosi, A. B. (2018). The effect of Quizlet on vocabulary acquisition. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 6(4), 71–77. doi:10.24203/ajeel.v6i4.5446
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and Language Teaching (pp. 198–218). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. doi:10.1177/1362168808089921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert Hanson, A. E., & Brown, C. M. (2020). Enhancing L2 learning through a mobile assisted spaced-repetition tool: An effective but bitter pill? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 133–155. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1552975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siangwan, N., & Abhakorn, J. (2016). The Effects of Contextualized and De-contextualized Vocabulary Teaching on Learners’ Memorization and Recognition of Word Meanings. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 21(28), 82–94.
   Google Scholar
• Spiri, J. (2008). Online study of frequency list vocabulary with the WordChamp website. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 7(1), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. International edition. US: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Takač, V. P. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ünaldı, I., Bardakçı, M., Akpınar, K. D., & Dolaş, F. (2013). A comparison of contextualized, decontextualized and corpus-informed vocabulary instruction: A quasi-experimental study. Dil ve Edebiyat Egitimi Dergisi. Journal of Language and Literature Education], 2(8), 78–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D. (2017). EFL vocabulary acquisition through word cards: Student perceptions and strategies. TESL-EJ, 21(3):3.
   Google Scholar
• Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory (Hove, England), 20(6), 568–579. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.687052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigglesworth, J., & Harvor, F. (2018). Making their own landscape: Smartphones and student designed language learning environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 437–458. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1412986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar